Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 15 of about 394 results (0.083 seconds)

M. Ranka Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Secretary to the G ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ281

..... to the earlier decisions of the court, it is held that the word 'control' includes disciplinary control and it is vested in the high court to effectuate the purpose of securing independence of the subordinate judiciary. it is stated that the high court is ..... accepted, article 345 will become a dead-letter in so far as subordinate courts are concerned, we cannot accept such an interpretation. the meaning of the word 'control' used in article 235 of the constitution and the nature and scope thereof have been explained in baradakanta mishra v. high court of orissa : air1976sc1899 . referring ..... central act 41 of 1976.2. the provisions in articles 345 to 347 of the constitution do not permit the use of any regional language in courts. the expression 'official purpose of the state' found in the article would not include judicial proceedings or purpose of courts.3. the subordinate courts are under the control of .....

Mohamed Gani Vs. Habibullah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1999)2MLJ609

..... building. it is not possible to presume that the legislature intended any such drastic or restrictive meaning to the expression 'natural advantage'. in fact in the judgment of karnataka high court itself, there is a reference to a judgment of a learned single judge of this court reported in moidin kunhi and anr. v. k. gopalakrishna ..... would be very much affected, strictly speaking, there should be proper pleadings and proof of customary rights as would be available under section 18 of the easements act. except for stating that as pardanashin ladies, they were entitled to privacy, no further pleadings are put forth and as pointed out by several rulings under section ..... of a person having a right to light and air coming to his property laterally appears to be based on illustration (d) to section 7 of the easements act. to appreciate the scope of the said provisions, section 7 is extracted below with illustration (d):section 7: easements restrictive of certain rights: easements are restrictions .....

K. Arunachalam and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)1MLJ63

..... entry of goods into local areas, use or sale therein (repeal) act of 1981, and karnataka act 10 of 1981, repealing the 1980 act. this act, however did not repeal ordinance no. 11 of 1980. in the meantime, karnataka ordinance no. 3 of 1981 came into force, which was followed by karnataka act no. 12 of 1981, which repealed ordinance no. 11 of 1980 ..... as a respondent. the supreme court by its judgment dated 25.9.1980 allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the karnataka high court and upheld the validity of the act. this decision is reported in state of karnataka v. hansa corporation : [1981]1scr823 .13. while civil appeal no. 3049 of 1979 was pending before the supreme court ..... in the writ petition before the high court was to strike down section 7 of the karnataka act 13 of 1982, sections 2 and 3 of the karnataka act 10 of 1984 and for a writ of mandamus to restrain the state of karnataka from enforcing the said provisions against the petitioners in the writ petitions. a batch of 1590 .....

The Electrical Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Crompton Engine ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1973)2MLJ424

..... their liability to return to the plaintiffs 3407 metric tons of steel. the plaintiffs, therefore, have filed the present application under section 20 of the arbitration act, 1940, for the reliefs mentioned therein contending that the agreement dated nth july, 1962 and the supplemental agreement dated 8th october, 1965 were both executed at ..... re 37 clomp. cases 184. that case related to jurisdiction of the court, in entertaining an application for winding up under the provisions of the companies act. there an agreement was entered into between monghyr electric supply company limited and the bihar state electricity board, whereby the undertaking of the company was taken over ..... which was rejected by the board in june, 1962. a question of limitation arose as to when an application under section 20 of the arbitration act started and the learned judge discussed the question of limitation. the present controversy did not arise for consideration before the learned judge and therefore the above .....

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... court held that from the language of section 30 [which is similar to section 32(4) of the act] and section 30-a of the karnataka cooperative societies act, 1959, it would be clear that the administrator, subject to control of registrar exercise all or any of the functions of the society, and the special officer, subject ..... to control of the state government and the registrar exercise and perform all the powers and functions of the committee ..... also does not help the petitioner where the issue was as regards the repugnancy between the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947 and public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971. a similar contention as is now raised was raised in the context of the amendment brought to the tamil nadu tax on .....

The Royal Sundaram Alliance Vs. D.Gunasekaran

Court : Chennai

..... mahazar. adverting to the above rival contentions and while concurring with the decision of the claims tribunal, and on the facts and circumstances of the reported case, the karnataka high court held as follows: 5. as regards the tribunal's conclusion that the respondent claimant was travelling in the said lorry transporting 5 coconut bags therein paying ..... of ladies, with their mango basket stopped the vehicle and boarded the lorry, with mangoes, in baskets to go to thiruvallur and near vengathur, the driver lost his control and dashed against a tree and thus, caused the accident.3. royal sundaram alliance insurance company, appellant herein, has objected to the claim petitions, on the grounds ..... in the case of a non-fare paying passenger, who is not the owner of goods. in view of the amendment to section 147 of the motor vehicles act, the act policy, covers the owners of the goods or their representatives.48. as per section 2(12), ".fares". includes sums payable for a season ticket or in .....

Empee Distilleries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... said authority has to exercise it only in the manner provided in the statute itself. (see also in this connection dhanajaya reddy v. state of karnataka.) the statute in question requires the authority to act in accordance with the rules for variation of the conditions attached to the permit. in our view, it is not permissible to the state government to ..... its own hands the power to approve or disapprove the decision after it has been taken, the decision will be held to have been validly made if the degree of control maintained by the authority is close enough for the decision to be regarded as the authority's own.". (iii) craies on statute law, 6th edn., p. 263, it ..... a statute relate to the performance of a public duty and the case is such that to hold null and void acts done in neglect of this duty would work serious general inconvenience or injustice to persons who have no control over those entrusted with the duty and at the same time would not promote the main object of legislature, it .....

N.P.Thangaraj Vs. Church of South India

Court : Chennai

..... churches in south india such as anglican, methodist, presbyterian and the south india united church in the four southern states of tamil nadu, kerala, karnataka and andhra pradesh. the church of south india is a protestant religious denomination. the headquarters of church of south india is situated in chennai. there ..... )non-payment of epf contribution by the 3rd respondent (7)the 3rd respondent has taken over correspondentship unconstitutionally (8)the 3rd respondent is having direct control over finance. (9)false statement by 3rd respondent to get solvency certificate in his personal name. (10)third respondent prevented diocesan vice-president from ..... act, 1956), as a religious and charitable company, which has no business character and with no profit motive. the properties of the churches in union have been transferred to csita. the jurisdiction of the csita covers the 22 dioceses and other units under their control spread over the four southern states ie., andhra pradesh, karnataka .....

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

..... chennai, palayamkottai central jail, vellore central jail, coimbatore central jail all in the state of tamil nadu and mysore central jail in the state of karnataka have video- conferencing facilities. therefore the respondent can be transferred to any one of those jails.44. while it is true that it is ..... government pertaining to prison administration, the care and welfare of the prisoners and their proper training for rehabilitation in society. he shall plan, organize and control all the institutional programmes, activities and operation. he shall endeavour to develop an institutional atmosphere for correctional work. he shall also exercise general supervision ..... authority. at this juncture, this court deems it fit to extract the relevant provisions, from the prisons act, 1894 prisoners act 1900, and the rules framed thereunder, enabling the prison authorities to have an effective control over the prisoners, in the prisons. they are responsible for the internal management of the prison.47. .....

Leaap International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax

Court : Chennai

..... chapter, the decision or order appealed agianst relates to any duty demanded in respect of goods which are not under the control of central excise authorities or any penalty levied under this act, the person desirous of appealing against such decision or order shall, pending the appeal, deposit with the adjudicating authority the ..... . special director, enforcement directorate and another 200 air scw 6004].12. the hon'ble supreme court in the case of s.vasudeva v. state of karnataka [air 199.sc 923.observed that under indian conditions the expression undue hardship is normally related to economic hardship. undue means something which is not merited ..... the said decision, the service provider had taken out the registration under custom house agent under section 65(35) read with section 65(105)(h) of finance act and rendered services such as fumigation, loading and unloading, stuffing goods in containers, labour charges for stuffing, facilitating charges and also collected ocean freight. the .....