Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 1 short title and commencement Page 9 of about 24,922 results (0.386 seconds)

Aug 01 1989 (HC)

Karnataka State Cine Junior Artists Association Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR2195

..... certificate by the director of information and publicity.54. the learned counsel has also pointed out that before section 3c was amended by karnataka act 22/85, all the kannada, kodava, konkani and tulu films, irrespective of the place of production, were entitled for 50% concession in payment of tax. it ..... government order dated 13th june 1989 granting 50% entertainment-tax under sections 3c(i)(a) and 4a(i) of the karnataka entertainment tax act, 1958 (the act) to the kannada feature film - 'sharavegada saradara'.3. the state of karnataka, the commissioner of commercial taxes and the director of information and publicity ..... authority empowered to grant such certificate is the director of information and publicity, is what can be inferred from the subsidy rules framed by the government and contained in the order dated 8th july 1988. subsidy is granted by the government to encourage production of films in kannada and other regional language feature films in the state and for the development .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2005 (HC)

Sharadamma and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3710; 2005(4)KarLJ481

..... inserted, namely.--'81-b. consequences to ensue upon the constitution of the bangalore development authority.--notwithstanding anything contained in this act, with effect from the date on which the bangalore development authority is constituted under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, the following consequences shall ensue.--(i) the bangalore development authority shall be the local planning authority for the local planning area comprising the city of bangalore with jurisdiction over the ..... ' for short), issued preliminary notification no. bda/commr/ alao/la9/104/2002-2003, dated 3-2-2003 under section 17 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 ('bda act' for short), originally proposing for acquisition of 3339 acres of land. the total extent was later shown as 3839 acres 12 guntas by issuing an erratum in august 2004, gazetted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2009 (HC)

indore Development Authority Vs. Shri Ram Builders and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009MP169

..... comes into play.32. in this context, we may refer with profit to section 54 of the act:54. lapse of scheme.-- if the town and country development authority fails to commence implementation of the town development scheme within a period of two years or complete its implementation within a period of five years from ..... 8. to appreciate the rivalised submissions, it is apropos to reproduce section 50 of the act:50. preparation of town development schemes.-- (1) the town and country development authority may, at any time, declare its intention to prepare a town development scheme.(2) not later than thirty days from the date of such declaration of intention ..... without considering the same. it was, however, argued for the appellant that the development authority need not have invited fresh objections and subjections for consideration since that procedure has already been followed by the improvement trust under the trust act. the provisions of section 87(1)(c)(ii) of the adhiniyam were also relied .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2004 (HC)

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)139PLR238

..... v. state of u.p., 1989 supp.(1) 504 and recently in the order dated 29.11.1996 (supreme court monitoring committee v. mussoorie dehradun development authority, writ petition (civil) no. 749 of 1995, decided on 29.11.1996). the earlier decision of this court in state of bihar v. banshi ..... 65 of 2001 against (i) the state of punjab through its secretary, housing, (ii) punjab housing urban development board through its vice chairman, (iii) punjab urban development authority through its chief administrator, (iv) punjab urban development authority through its general manager (regulatory) and (v) collector, ropar (hereinafter referred to as the appellants), for a ..... flower, fruit and honey', were prohibited. according to the plaintiff- respondent no. 1, it had sought permission from the 'competent authority' under the 1952 act to raise construction and develop the forest hill golf resort. obviously, this permission was sought for 'erecting the buildings' which is otherwise prohibited under section 5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2006 (HC)

Kanigalla Venkata Subba Rao and ors. Vs. Vice-chairman, Vgtm Urban Dev ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD442; 2006(5)ALT361

..... their shops in i town. this naturally resulted various problems for the residents with regard to basic infrastructure facilities.3. vijayawada urban development authority was constituted under a.p. urban areas (development) act, 1975 (urban development act, for brevity). in 1980, the said authority adopted zoning regulations earmarking i town area consisting of ward numbers 1 to 7 of the then vijayawada municipality as residential area/zone ..... taken overriding effect.32. the power to prepare master plan, define various zones for the purpose of development and preparing zonal development plan containing the said land and land use plan is conferred on the urban development authority (see sections 6 and 7 of urban development act). sub-section (2) of section 7 contemplates the land for public use and private use and specification of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2006 (HC)

All India Trade Union Congress, Visakha District Council, Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD565; 2007(2)ALT679

..... in an undeveloped area. these provisions do not contain any prohibition against entering into a development agreement between the development authority and a private entrepreneur. therefore, the development agreement entered into between vuda and respondent nos. 3 to 5 cannot be termed as violative of the provisions of the act and nullified on that ground.10. the next question which merits consideration is whetherthe decision ..... a manner that they are well integrated with the overall master plans of the developed area under the jurisdiction of the respectively urban development authorities. plans of the satellite townships shall be in the shape of zonal development plans to be prepared under section 7 of the andhra pradesh urban areas (development) act, 1975 and they shall be got sanctioned by the government.(3) the area .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1993 (HC)

Ramanand Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993(26)DRJ594

..... article 226 of the constitution of india, in the context of large scale acquisition, development and disposal of land for purposes of planned development of delhi, two questions of law have arisen for determination under the delhi development act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and the delhi development authority (disposal of developed nazul land) rules, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the nazul rules). the questions are ..... :- 1. whether a person whose land has been acquired for planned development of delhi has got a vested right to the allotment of alternative .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2011 (SC)

Girnar Traders and Digambar Motiram Jhadhav. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... land acquisition act is to acquire land for public purpose and for ..... clear that the primary object of this act is acquisition of land for a public purpose which may be `planned development' or even otherwise. in fact the provisions of the land acquisition act do not deal with the concept of development as is intended under the specific statutes like mrtp act, delhi development act, 1957, bangalore development authority act, 1976 (for short, `the bangalore act') etc. the primary purpose of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1993 (HC)

Smt. Satyavani and Another Vs. A.P. Pollution Control Board and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1993AP257

..... in favour of the 5th respondent m/s. al-kabeer. since it is the central government which is the competent authority about the location of industrial undertaking under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, the state government cannot decide about the location of an industrial undertaking in respect of which letter of intent ..... approached the a. p. pollution control board which has granted noc on 15-4-89 subject to certain conditions and the agricultural and processing food export development authority in its letter dated 28-8-91 observed that according to 1982 livestock sensus of the ministry of agriculture, buffalo population in andhra pradesh was estimated ..... wealth, the 5th respondent is relying on the report of the central institute for research on buffaloes and the report of agricultural processed food products export development authority, which are in their favour to the effect that the project will not have any effect on the cattle wealth of the state.39. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2003 (HC)

J.K. Impex and anr. and Mangali Impex Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 105(2003)DLT605; 2003(71)DRJ709; 2003(89)ECC412; 2004(167)ELT270(Del)

..... relevant provisions of export and import policy as well as foreign trade (development & reglation) act, 1992 and imports and exports (control) act, 1947. the parliament has enacted a foreign trade (development & regulation) act, 1992 (for short' the act') for the development and regulation of foreign trade by facilitating imports into, and augmenting exports ..... details of such investigation. within two weeks thereafter, the petitioners would submit their representation and may also ask for personal hearing. the competent authority shall consider the representation and give the petitioners personal hearing, if desired, and decide the representation of the petitioners within four weeks thereafter. ..... no obligation to formulate reasons and nothing more. formal reasons may lead to complication when the matter is still under investigation. so the authority may not give formal reasons, but the skeletal allegations must be mentioned in order to provide an opportunity to the person affected to make .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //