Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 1 short title and commencement Page 12 of about 24,922 results (0.367 seconds)

Gas Authority Of India Limited Vs. M/s Manyata Residents Association

Court : Karnataka

..... the contentions of learned counsel appearing for the parties, it would be useful to consider the following legal framework: a. bangalore development authority act, 1976: (bda act) the preamble of the act reads as under: an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority for the development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and for matters connected therewith. x x x 2. definitions. in ..... and such other particulars as the commissioner may consider necessary, by affixing a notice on the notice board of the office of the authority and also by publishing in not less than two daily news papers in english and kannada having vide circulation in the city of bangalore.4. disposal of sites reserved. notwithstanding any thing in these rules, the sites reserved .....

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Manyatha Residents Association

Court : Karnataka

..... the contentions of learned counsel appearing for the parties, it would be useful to consider the following legal framework: a. bangalore development authority act, 1976: (bda act) the preamble of the act reads as under: an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority for the development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and for matters connected therewith. x x x 2. definitions. in ..... and such other particulars as the commissioner may consider necessary, by affixing a notice on the notice board of the office of the authority and also by publishing in not less than two daily news papers in english and kannada having vide circulation in the city of bangalore.4. disposal of sites reserved. notwithstanding any thing in these rules, the sites reserved .....

Syndicate Bank Vs. M/s Manyatha Residents Association

Court : Karnataka

..... the contentions of learned counsel appearing for the parties, it would be useful to consider the following legal framework: a. bangalore development authority act, 1976: (bda act) the preamble of the act reads as under: an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority for the development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and for matters connected therewith. x x x 2. definitions. in ..... and such other particulars as the commissioner may consider necessary, by affixing a notice on the notice board of the office of the authority and also by publishing in not less than two daily news papers in english and kannada having vide circulation in the city of bangalore.4. disposal of sites reserved. notwithstanding any thing in these rules, the sites reserved .....

J. Mahabaleshwarappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(1)KarLJ139

..... for any public or semi-public purpose. the said plot comes within the residential zone. therefore, there is a total bar under the mandatory provisions of the town planning act and the development authority act. the recommendation sent by the third respondent is contrary to the material on record and contrary to the ground reality of the utilization of the land for which it ..... in the 'noc' and the precautionary measures to be taken. the third respondent has called for objections from the public in general vide notification published in the 'loka darshana' a kannada daily on 9th january, 1998. in pursuance of the said paper publication, calling for objections from the public, nobody has filed objections. accordingly, the third respondent recommended for conversion of .....

M/S Agari Enterprises, Through Its Proprietor Vs. Sesappa Saphaliga an ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

..... properly explained. this is the basic test which needs to be applied. the true guide is whether the petitioner has acted with reasonable diligence in the prosecution of his appeal/petition?. 13. supreme court in anshul aggarwal vs. new okhla industrial development authority, iv (2011) cpj 63 (sc)?laid down that; it is also apposite to observe that while deciding an application filed ..... using the said chest cooler for nearly 25 days, respondents came to his show-room and, made false allegations. respondents have filed the complaints only to harass him. 4. dakshina kannada district consumer disputes redressal forum, mangalore, (for short, district forum) vide order dated 15.7.2011, allowed the complaint and passed the following order; the complaints are allowed. opposite party .....

Capt. M.V. Subbarayappa Vs. Bharat Electronics Employees Co-operative ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR390; 1990(3)KarLJ520

..... is not involved; that the location of the sewerage treatment plant in the civic amenity site is opposed to the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') and that civic amenity site cannot at all be used for the purpose for which it is now proposed to be used. in ..... the oxidation pond. the final incorporating the above suggesting may be furnished at an early date.'in addition to this, when a news item appeared in a kannada daily 'prajavani' dated 28-2-1989 the third respondent got the matter re-examined through the incharge additional secretary, department of ecology and environment, who on ..... effluent treatment plant, the area will be polluted and will have mosquito nuisance. he had questioned the wisdom of the pollution control board and the bangalore development authority in allowing such a unit to come up around residential area.the area where the treatment plant is under construction who was examined and discussions were held .....

The State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Chief Secretary and ors. Vs. Sri Sr ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR5031; 2009(3)KarLJ674; 2009(1)KCCR153

..... the monument, the same would be to the extent of 74.60 acres as worked out by the petitioners. this in fact has been admitted by the town development authority, chamarajanagar by its communication dated 30.12.2002 addressed to one of the petitioners wherein it has been stated that the 300 meters area surrounding the janana mantapa ..... . further this large extent of land is not established to be a 'archaeological site and remains' in terms of section 2(3) of the act. if that be so, prevention of development or enjoyment of the property by the persons residing and carrying on business in an extent of 70 acres without being acquired or being duly compensated ..... prior to the issue of the impugned notification dated 15.6.2001 under section 4(3) of the act, the director, directorate of antiquities and museum, mysore by communication dated 8.3.2001 addressed to the secretary, ministry of kannada and culture had indicated certain reasons as to why it would not only be counter productive but would not .....

Smt. Nagarathnamma and Others Vs. B. Rudriah and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... contended that the plaintiffs have not taken any steps either to prevent the alienees or to challenge the alienations made by the other co-sharer. the bangalore development authority has acquired lands in sy.nos.12 and 108 and formed a layout and allotted sites to various persons. when the defendants constructed factory shed, cinema buildings ..... . further, the names of the persons impleaded and their addresses are erroneous. the plaintiffs have deliberately not taken steps to serve the notices through court and kannada prabha through which notice was taken out to some of the defendants by substituted service, the said news paper is not in circulation in the area in ..... the legality of the construction of the cinema theatre on the land in question as it is violative of the provisions of the karnataka cinemas regulation act, karnataka land reforms act and other appropriate laws on the subject. therefore, the plaintiffs sought for a declaration that each plaintiff is entitled for 1/3rd share in .....

Ramesh Kumar Shukla Vs. Allahabad Development Authority and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1555; (2000)2UPLBEC1089

..... in terms of the stipulation contained in the allotment order, the allotment in favour of the petitioner was liable to be cancelled. the development authority, therefore, did not act illegally in passing the impugned order of cancellation of allotment in favour of the petitioner. the court is further of the opinion that the ..... court dated november 22, 1994, at length and in detail.2. the acts and events constituting the facts of the case, as they emerge from the pleadings before the court, are these :'the allahabad development authority, allahabad, the respondent no. 1, hereinafter called the 'development authority', issued a notification in the newspaper 'northern india patrika' dated november 20 ..... development authority did not commit any illegality in passing a fresh order of allotment in favour of the respondent no. 3. the allotment of .....

R. Srinivasa Murthy and Others Vs. Munichinnappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2012(3)KCCR1703; 2012(4)KantLJ691

..... period of delay, viz., usually its rental value (see: chitty on contracts 27th edition, volume-1, para 26.041 - referred to with approval by the apex court in ghaziabad development authority versus union of india (2000) 6 scc 113) there is no evidence on record that in the instant case there was any substantial difference in the price of the land ..... breach in failing to execute the sale deed on demand, within the prescribed period, the suit was filed on 2.8.1980. under the agreement, which is in the kannada language, the defendant had agreed that in the event he should fail to complete the sale transaction - he would be liable to repay twice the amount of the advance sale ..... received and also be liable in damages. this term was not a bar to a suit for specific performance of contract in terms of section 23 of the specific relief act, 1963. however, that aspect of the matter is no longer debatable in the light of the conclusion arrived at by this court, in the appeal filed earlier, and the .....