Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 1 short title and commencement Court: chennai Page 1 of about 770 results (0.405 seconds)

The Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Ministry ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC460; (2006)4MysLJ826

..... maintainability of such writ petition at the instance of the member-secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority.12. in this context, it is noticed that under section 9(b) of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971, the metropolitan development authority, a body corporate, shall have perpetual succession and a common seal and subject to ..... relating to coastal regulatory zone. such amendment was challenged in w.p. no. 15518/2003, which was filed by the member-secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority. such writ petition was entertained by a learned single judge and an order of interim stay of such notification till 25.06.2003 was passed by ..... such restriction or qualification as may be imposed by or under this act or any other law, may sue or be sued in its .....

M/s. Tungabadra Minerals Private Limited Vs. The Chennai Port Trust Re ...

Court : Chennai

..... of plant' would indicate only the plaintiff and stated that this would constitute a supervening circumstance. in this connection, the learned counsel relied on delhi development authority vs. kenneth builders and developers ltd., and ors., reported in 2016 scc online sc 627 and stated that the defendants being a state owned a greater duty towards the plaintiff ..... upsets the very foundation upon which the parties rested their bargain, it can very well be said that the promissory finds it impossible to do the act which he promised to do. although various theories have been propounded by the judges and jurists in england regarding teh juridical basis of the doctrine of frustration ..... having been indulged in illegal activity cannot turn around and seek indulgence from this court. frustration of a contract is a direct result owing to their own act. they involved in illegal activity of mining iron ore with their eyes opened. they invited the ban. they cannot complain that the government orders has .....

Shanmugadurai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary and Commi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ202

..... public purpose mentioned is as follows:'to wit for land assembly (?) and development project along inner ring road by madras metropolitan development authority.'from a cursory look at the notification of the acquisition act, it is abundantly clear that it is vague and the competent authority has not specifically stated the public purpose for which the lands are sought to be acquired. the usage of ..... the terms, 'lands are required for the purpose of land assembly and development project' are very general .....

Nankachi Enterprises Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... , department of geology and mining, industries department, is directed to issue appropriate directions to all the district collectors and the authorities under the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1952, tamil nadu minor and mineral concession rules, 1959 and tamil nadu prevention of illegal mining, transportation and storage of ..... .vijayakumar, learned additional government pleader, submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred under section 23(c)(1) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government have framed the tamil nadu prevention of illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and mineral dealers' rules, 2011 ( ..... operations and section 4 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that both the central and state laws, refer only to mining of minerals, which require permission from the competent authorities and inasmuch as the petitioner is only a buyer .....

Park View Enterprises Vs. State Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1991]189ITR192(Mad)

..... nowhere uses the word 'owner of land or building'. it only states that "any person" intending to carry out any development of any land or building, shall make an application to the appropriate planning authority in such form, containing particulars accompanied by such documents as may be prescribed. ownership in a particular property, whether movable or ..... bench of this could held that no circular of the central board of taxation in income-tax matters could ever fetter the, judicial discretion of the authorities administering the act.15. learned counsel mr. vedantham srinivasan by referring to certain english decisions and halsbury's laws of england, would claim that property is a complex ..... is in referring to s. 49 of tn act 35 of 1972, which nowhere refers to the word owner of the land making the application, and it states that "any person" can make an application to the appropriate planning authority and ask for permission to carry out development on any land or building. after referring to .....

Park View Enterprises Vs. State Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas723(Mad)

..... uses the words 'owner of land or building'. it only states that 'any person' intending to carry out any development of any land or building shall make an application to the appropriate planning authority in such form containing particulars accompanied by such documents as may be prescribed. ownership in a particular property, whether movable ..... bench of this court held that no circular of the central board of direct taxes in income-tax matters could ever fetter the judicial discretion of the authorities administering the act. 25. learned counsel, mr. vedantham srinivasan, by referring to certain english decisions and halsbury's laws of england, would claim that property is a ..... referring to section 49 of the tamil nadu act (35 of 1972), which nowhere refers to the owner of the land making the application, and it states that 'any person' can make an application to the appropriate planning authority and ask for permission to carry out development on any land or building. after referring to .....

K.P. Enterprises Rep. by Its Proprietrix Mrs. K. Vasumathi Vs. the Dis ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2004Mad151

..... contended that in the absence of despatch slip the respondent has the authority to detain and pass the impugned order, ultimately he has to concede that the respondent has no jurisdiction and section 21(4) of the mines and mineral (development and regulation) act, 1957 also will not cover the present consignment of kerala granite.12 ..... corresponded with the keral authorities who also confirmed the factual position. the provisions of the tamil nadu minor mineral concession rules has no application at all. the respondent has acted without jurisdiction. that apart, it is an inter-state movement.23. section 21(4) of the mines and mineral (development and regulation) act, 1957 also will not ..... apply nor it confers power on the respondent and therefore the action is without jurisdiction. under section 15 of the mines and mineral (regulation and development) act, 1957 the state has been conferred with a power to make rules in respect of minor minerals for regulating the grant of quarry lease, mining .....

L. Vinayagam and Two ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and Two ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC289

..... . lakshmi devi : air1963sc1077 . in other words, the fact that actual development is permissible in an area other than a development area with the approval or sanction of the local authority did not preclude the central government from acquiring the land for planned development under the act. section 12 is concerned only with the planned development. it has nothing to do with acquisition of property; acquisition generally ..... precedes development. for planned development in an area other than a development area, it is only necessary to obtain the sanction or .....

L.Vinayagam and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ509

..... . lakshmi devi : air1963sc1077 ). in other words, the fact that actual development is permissible in an area other than a development area with the approval or sanction of the local authority did not preclude the central government from acquiring the land for planned development under the act. section 12 is concerned only with the planned development. it has nothing to do with acquisition of property; acquisition generally ..... precedes development. for planned development in an area other than a development area, it is only necessary to obtain the sanction or .....

G. Narayanaswami Naidu Vs. C. Krishnamurthi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1958Mad343; (1958)1MLJ367

..... . 25. besides, functional classification itself has its roots in history and historical evolution has not been the same in england and in india. the growth and development of municipal and local administration, and their history have run .on different lines in the two countries, though in this case, the impact of the english ..... the solution of regional problems, still their use for the purpose of carrying on commercial undertakings or industrial concern is a modern and indeed a post-war development. sir arthur street said of them british government since 1918:like flowers in spring, they have grown as variously and profusely and with as little regard ..... of any other corporate bodies save that for some unexplained reason three or four of them enjoy modified exemption from the limitation act, 1939. they have not even the protection of the public authorities protection act as amended by the last-named enactment. it is true, however, that some of their principal statutory duties are expressed .....