Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 1 short title and commencement Page 6 of about 24,922 results (0.430 seconds)

Kailash NaraIn Agnihotri Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC31; (2005)1UPLBEC283

..... 1966'), framed under the act, 1959. the uttar pradesh urban planning and development (amendment and validation) act, 1973 was enacted and in view thereof the kanpur development authority came into existence on 13.9.1974. petitioner was also transferred to the kanpur development authority on 25.6.1975. from there he was transferred to allahabad development authority on 29.6.1978 and ..... came into force on 22.10.1984. the provisions of section 5-a of the act remained the same as contained in ordinance no. 10 of 1985.10. petitioner made a representation in 1987 seeking absorption in the development authorities centralised service and also for confirmation on the post of assistant engineer and further promotion as ..... of the ordinance no. 19 of 1984 which came into effect on 22.10.1984 he stood absorbed in development authorities centralised service in view of the provisions of section 5-a of the 1973 act. the rights accrued to him were saved by virtue of the provisions of section 6 of the general .....

Kalyani Breweries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1991)2CALLT287(HC),1992(57)ELT373(Cal)

..... .20. on the 9th january 1986, the agriculture and processed food product export development authority act 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the said 1985 act) came into force. the object of the said act was to establish an authority 'for the development and promotion of exports of certain agricultural and processed food products.' in the statement ..... the notification must be read in that context. reliance has been placed on the agricultural and processed pood products export development authority act 1985 in which item 8 of the schedule to the said act specified 'alcoholic/and non-alcoholic/beverages' as one of the items treated as a processed food product. it is ..... country.'21. it is further stated in the statement of objects and reasons to the 1985 act inter alia that 'the main function proposed to be assigned to the authority constituted under the act' was to develop processed food industry by wayof.........improvement in packaging of scheduled products and marketing of the products .....

M.N. Ramesh and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... the court and they have been perused by the learned single judge. he considered section 65 of the karnataka urban development authority act, 1987 ("kuda 1987", for short) and rule 19 of the karnataka urban development authorities (allotment of sites) 1991 (for short, "allotment of sites rules, 1991") and considered the main issue with ..... had made their respective applications for allotment of a site in vijayanagar 4th stage, 2nd phase and other layouts formed by second respondent - mysore urban development authority ("muda", for short), in mysore city. appellants herein were allotted sites on payment of initial deposit and had to pay the balance consideration amount to ..... to hold that if the respondents have not followed rule 19 of the karnataka urban development authority (sites allotment) rules 1991, it attracts the application of the doctrine of desuetude. when the respondents have been consistently acting in disregard of the said rule 19, some kind of implied repeal or quasi-repeal .....

Present : Mr.Shyam Kumar Sharma Advocate for the Petitioner. Vs. D.R.G ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... impugns the order dated 28.03.2014 (annexure p-17) passed under sections 17(9) and 30 of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977 ( hereinafter referred to as 'the act').by the revisional authority-cum- principal secretary to government of haryana, town and country planning & urban estates department, haryana, whereby the revision petition preferred ..... the petitioner filed an appeal on 17.07.2007 before the commissioner, hisar division, hisar, exercising the powers of chief administrator, haryana urban development authority. the appellate authority vide order dated 08.10.2013 (annexure p-16) allowed the petitioner's appeal and restored the allotment on the ground that though the ..... petitioner did not deposit even a single installment as per the agreed terms and conditions despite several show cause notices issued by huda authorities under section 17 of the act. the estate officer, huda, therefore, cancelled the allotment and resumed the plot vide order dated 22.1.2001 (annexure p .....

Amrik Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)152PLR439

..... transparent, non-discriminatory and fair procedure which the respondents ought to follow while allotting the valuable immovable properties? section 15 of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977 provides as under:15. disposal of land.-(1) subject to any directions given by the state government under this ..... respondents to allot the aforesaid plot to him on 'first come first served' basis. 3. the facts may be noticed briefly. on 31.3.1987 the haryana urban development authority (for short 'huda') invited applications for 'booking agencies' in the transport nagar at panipat on free hold 'first come first served' basis. there were total 47 ..... act and the provisions of sub-section (5), the authority may dispose of.xx xx (3) subject to the provisions hereinbefore contained, the authority may, sell, lease or otherwise transfer whether by auction, allotment or otherwise any land or building .....

Shri Manshapuran Hanumanji Ka Vikas Samiti Through Baba Shri Hanumanth ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2000Raj389; 2000(3)WLC1; 2001(1)WLN663

..... of land without any permission and unauthorisedly. this court shall not encourage such kind of encroachment and construction upon public land.4. section 72 of the jaipur development authority act, 1982 is very clear on this aspect. the section says; whoever makes any encroachment in any land or space not belngprtvate property, whether such land or ..... perusal of the record that the land in dispute was allocated and earmarked for construction of a nursery and a boundary wall was also erected by the jaipur development authority. however, before any further work could be commenced, a temple came to be erected on the above strip of land by the appellant-society, alleged ..... to any other person and that the same should be allotted to the appellant-petitioner society.2. in the reply to the stay petition, the jaipur development authority have questioned the locus standi of the appellant in maintaining the writ petition and that thewrit petition should be dismissed at the threshold in favour of the .....

Present : Mr.Sanjiv Manrai Senior Advocate with Vs. Veer Bhan .....Pet ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... deposited 30% of the allotment price but thereafter no installment was paid. several notices were issued to him under section 17 of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and finding no response, the estate officer, huda, sonepat vide order dated 29.01.1996 (annexure p-1) resumed the site. the petitioner ..... his feet. the plea that the installments could not be deposited due to financial crises, cannot be accepted as the authorities like the respondent- huda who have allotted the plot, cannot continue with the regulated development on mere assurances. mohinder kumar201408.14 16:51 i attest to the accuracy of this order chandigarh cwp no.14514 ..... filed an appeal under the act. the appellate authority took a lenient view and restored the plot vide order dated 12.02.1998 mohinder kumar201408.14 16:51 i attest to the accuracy of this order .....

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Vs. A.P. Verma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All175; (2005)2UPLBEC1813

..... lucknow (sunday), faizabad (monday) and varanasi (tuesday) at the given addresses.5. the applicant submits that no permission has been taken from the allahabad development authority to utilise the park, the people who assemble in the park ease and defecate around the park and the entire area becomes nauseative. sri ajay pratap ..... the lal mahendra sewa shakti samiti, kotwa kot, allahabad is a registered society, with registration no. 1405 under the provisions of the societies registration act. the aims and object of the society are purely religious and charitable, such as to establish intoxication free society to serve the helpless, to help ..... them from persons practicing and professing unauthorized medical practices.17. the indian medical council act 1956, the indian medicine central council act 1970, the u.p. indian medicine act 1939, the homoeopathic central council act 1993, the dentists act, 1948 provide for a statutory scheme of educational qualifications, standards of education, award .....

Tata Steel Limited Vs. Lindsay International (P) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... width and ambit of power under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 has been recently considered by the hon ble supreme court in associate builders versus delhi development authority reported at 2015 (3) scc49 section 5 of the 1996 act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being ..... enforce, in matters governed by part 1, no judicial authority is to intervene, except where so provided in the said ..... in a fairly recent decision of associate builders versus delhi development authority reported at (2015) 3 scc49the hon ble supreme court had the occasion to re-consider the grounds on which an award can be challenged under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. in dealing with the grounds on which an .....

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Sangee ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... /-. after depositing 25% amount, the petitioner did not make any payment of the due installments despite series of notices served on her under section 17 (1) of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977. the firs.notice served on her to this effect was dated 26.08.1993 kumar mohinder 2014.01.13 16:04 i attest to the accuracy of this order ..... her own request that the plot was resumed and 10% of the allotment price was deducted. the aggrieved petitioner preferred an appeal which was declined by the appellate authority prescribed under the act. her revision petition has also been dismissed by the state government vide a self-speaking order dated 9.4.2013 observing that the process of surrender was complete as .....