Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 1 short title and commencement Page 5 of about 24,922 results (0.542 seconds)

Behar Engineering Corporation Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... be cancelled. it is further stated that the affairs in question are governed by the bihar industrial area development authority act. the same was amended by the bihar state industrial area development authority (amendment) act 1991, a photocopy of the gazette notification whereof is marked annexure-a to the counter affidavit of respondent ..... nos. 2 to 4. the authority ultimately came to the conclusion that the petitioner has although acted in violation of the terms ..... dated 16.10.2001 (annexure-3), the petitioner had approached respondent no. 6 (managing director, patna industrial area development authority), and respondent no. 7 (the development officer, patna industrial area development authority), and explained to them that cancellation of the lease was not in accordance with law, the terms and conditions .....

Pee Kay Constructions Vs. Chandrasekhar Hegde

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR241

..... the citb or the bda if such a regulation is not forthcoming in the cdp.8. the function of the bda under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (for short 'the bda act'), which incorporates it, is to provide for the development of the city of bangalore. the bda, frames the requisite scheme, acquires the lands, forms the layout and allots the sites. while allotting ..... impugned construction.7. it is not possible to accept this contention. the 'planning authority' for bangalore, under the tcp act, is the bda and therefore, it is the function of the bda to finalise the odp (outer development plan) cdp (comprehensive development plan) and the town planning scheme under the tcp act. the cdp categorizes the 'land use' as-'(1) residential,(2) commercial,(3) industrial .....

Kalyan Sahai Kedawat Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1437

..... the purpose of planning co-ordinating and supervising the proper, orderly and rapid development of jaipur region and of executing plans, projects and schemes for such development and to provide for matters connected therewith the jaipur development authority act, 1982 (for short' jda act') was enacted. jaipur region has been defined in section 2(8) thus:jaipur region means the areas in the limits of the ..... such notification, and there upon the modified area shall be the jaipur region.6. section 16(h) of jda act provides that for preparing schemes and advising the concerned authorities departments for development in formulating and undertaking schemes for development of agriculture, horticulture, floriculture, forestry, dairy development, transport communication, schooling cultural activities, sports, medicare, tourism entertainment and similar other activities.7. the roads and their .....

Bangalore International Airport Limited Vs. Karnataka Information Comm ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2010KAR3214

..... regard, one can refer to the division bench ruling of this court in the case of bhavan1 housing cooperative society limited (r) v. bangalore development authority reported in manu/ka/8325/2006. this court while considering whether the definition of a particular phrase can be imported in a particular enactment has held ..... in the state of karnataka which is called as greenfield project and to this effect, the government of karnataka has authorized ksiidc to be a nodal agency for undertaking all activities tdlvards development of the airport as a joint venture. he would also press into service certain clauses in the concession agreement which ..... that it is not a government company as defined under section 617 of the companies act. 1956. a shareholders agreement (sha) dated 23.01.2002 was entered into between the karnataka state industrial investment and development corporation limited (ksiidc), airport authority of india (aai). siemens project ventures gmbh, flughafen zuerich ag, larsen and .....

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Iqbal ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... alongwith interest as per the policy guidelines of huda. the huda preferred revision petition before the state government under section 17(9) of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977, which has been accepted vide the impugned order observing as follows:- .....the allottee in the present case miserably failed to deposit the demanded price in ..... preferred by the kumar mohinder 2014.01.30 12:09 i attest to the accuracy of this order chandigarh cwp no.26142 of 2013 [2].haryana urban development authority (for short, 'huda') and the allottees, the hon'ble supreme court in hars.dhingra and others versus state of haryana and others.(2001) 9 ..... 23.5.2002 calling upon him to pay the due installments. the petitioner, however, did not respond thereto and admittedly, did not deposit any installment. the authorities are said to have then cancelled the allotment. the petitioner filed an appeal after about seven years through his general power of attorney, before the administrator, .....

Utpal Dasgupta Vs. Mrinal Kanti Sinha and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... width and ambit of power under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 has been recently considered by the hon ble supreme court in associate builders versus dehli development authority reported at 2015 (3) scc49 section 5 of the 1996 act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being ..... enforce, in matters governed by part 1, no judicial authority is to intervene, except where so provided in the said ..... in a fairly recent decision of associate builders versus delhi development authority reported at (2015) 3 scc49the hon ble supreme court had the occasion to re-consider the grounds on which an award can be challenged under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. in dealing with the grounds on which an .....

Ram Kishan Agarwal Son of Shri Jayanti Prasad Agarwal, Vs. Mathura Vri ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2006All27; 2006(1)AWC277

..... have heard sri p.c.jain advocate for the petitioners, the learned standing counsel for the state and sri d.s. chauhan for the mathura vrindawan development authority (referred hereafter as mvda) at length. a short counter affidavit has been filed by the mvda.2. the petitioners are small colonizers. on 2.7 ..... the land after section 4 notification.10. therefore, even pendency of land acquisition proceedings would not entitle a development authority to refuse sanction to the layout or construction plan. sanction of plan by the development authority does not create any additional rights for the owner in respect of the land or otherwise. sanction merely ..... removes the bar on construction imposed by the u.p. urban planning and development act 1973, which act is basically to prevent haphazard construction activity. but .....

Pure Industrial Cock and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)MPHT380

..... the commissioner as a delegate of the state government dispensing with enquiry under section 5a of the land acquisition act, 1894 for the purposes of acquiring land for implementation of scheme no. 140 of the indore development authority. this will be clear from paragraphs 2 and 3 of the judgment and order dated 23-11 -2006 ..... government) in exercise of section 17(4) to dispense with the summary enquiry under section 5a of the act, has been assailed.thus, the framing and the publication of the scheme no. 140 of the indore development authority was not in challenge before the court. nonetheless, the division bench referred in paragraph 4 of its ..... sub-section (4) and as from such date shall be binding on all development authorities constituted under this act and all local authorities functioning within the planning area.a reading of section 19 of the adhiniyam, quoted above, would show that till the development plan is finally approved and published, the state government retains the power to .....

Srinath Hegde, Bangalore and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authorit ...

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents: ii. declare that the acquisition of land initiated by the respondents vide notification dated 2.8.1978 during 1977-78 under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, in respect of the land in sy.no.1/4 of geddalahalli village, kasaba hobli, bangalore north taluk, (presently rmv 2nd stage, bnmp ward ..... respondents; ii. declare that the acquisition of land initiated by the respondents vide notification dated 2.8.1978 during 1977-78 under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, in respect of the land in sy.no.1/4 of geddalahalli village, kasaba hobli, bangalore north taluk, (presently rmv 2nd stage, bbmp ward ..... respondents (ii) declare that the acquisition of land initiated by the respondents vide notification dt.2.8.1978 during 1977-78 under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, in respect of the land in sy.no.1/4 of geddahalli village, kasaba hobli, bangalore north taluk [presently rmv 2nd stage bbmp ward .....

Revajeethu Builders and Developers Vs. S. Vasudeva

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1417; 1991(1)KarLJ522

..... and revajeethu have consented to accommodate the boulevard, park and the road when they submit their plans for approval of the bangalore development authority in regard to land user as that authority is also the competent authority under the country and town planning. act. therefore, we do not find any substance that there has been actual mala fide committed by the government in not traversing ..... dispute as noticed by the learned single judge. no document such as the notification under section 48 of the land acquisition act was ever placed before the learned single judge. he drew his inferences from the register maintained by the bangalore development authority which was none other than the successor to the bangalore city improvement trust board. no doubt, such register is public .....