Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 1 short title and commencement Page 100 of about 24,922 results (0.388 seconds)

Sunair Hotel Ltd. Vs.vls Finance Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... of delay. the same cannot be said to exist as far as the present case is concerned.51. the decision of the db of this court in delhi development authority v durga construction company (supra) does require a strict scrutiny of the reasons offered for the delay in re-filing. the present petitions pass the above test. ..... december, 2015. it is submitted that there is a restricted timeline under the act and this has been emphasised in union of india v. popular construction co. air2001sc4010and by this court in delhi omp (comm.) 16 & 17 of 2016 page 9 of 23 development authority v durga construction company 2013 (13)9 drj133(db). as regards falsehood in ..... was changed. here, as pointed out, that change took place as a result of the notification of the commercial courts act, 2015, which was an important intervening factor. in ahluwalia contracts india ltd v. housing and urban development corporation (supra), there was a delay of 55 days which was beyond the period of limitation under section 34 (3 .....

Pio, Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. And Anr. Vs.vishwa ...

Court : Delhi

..... of the above, it is apparent that the recommendations made by cic to comptroller and auditor general of india or the ministry of urban development, government of india are outside the cic s jurisdiction under the act.10. the observation that hudco has admitted that it does not maintain records of purchases of costly gifts, is also unwarranted. hudco ..... remunerations paid to each of them; (iv) appointment of ms, shweta kulslreshtha as management trainee in uttarakhand; (v) vigilance clearance given to mr. ravi kant. the respondent authority is directed to facilitate inspection on 20.04.2017 at 1130 hours. 5.6 on 05.07.2017, the cic issued an interim order dated 05.07.2017 in the ..... the cic, alleging denial of information. on 19.09.2016, the respondent also preferred an appeal under section 19 of the act before the first appellate authority (faa). the said appeal was rejected by an order dated 28.09.2016, whereby the faa called upon the respondent to establish the usefulness of the information .....

Ramkala vs.delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

..... the entire area and in this backdrop to dismiss the claims of the appellant, would lead to gross miscarriage of justice. reliance is placed on associate builders vs. delhi development authority reported in 2014 (4) arb. law fao(os) (comm.) 191/2017 page 8 of 21 reporter 307 (sc), the supreme court while relying on oil & natural ..... no.39821/2017 ramkala ..... appellant through: mr.inder bir singh alag, senior advocate with mr.m.aggarwal, mr.s.k.sharma and mr.r.s.bisht, advocates. versus delhi development authority ..... respondent through: mr.pawan mathur, standing counsel with mr. c. tete, dy. director lpc. + coram: hon'ble mr. justice g.s.sistani hon'ble ms. ..... narrow. he further submits that in the present petition filed under section 37 of arbitration act, the court cannot sit as a court of appeal or re- appreciate the evidence on record. reliance is placed on sudhakar tiwari vs. delhi development authority reported in 2016 scc online del 667, a judgment passed by a coordinate bench of .....

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Bhim Sain Goel And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by declaration under section 3d. (15) at this juncture, we must notice the principles laid down in jaipur development authority v. mahesh sharma and another (2010) 9 scc782 26. despite vesting of the land with the government under the provisions of the jagir act and also resumption of the said land measuring 29 bighas and 17 biswas by the government, a notification proposing ..... apart from the issues which arise from judgment of the constitution bench, there is another dimension which has unfolded. this later development consists of the following: the national highways authority of india came to notify the lands in question acting under the national highways act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 1956 act for brevity) by issuance of a notification under section 3a of the said .....

Fisherman Care Vs. The Government Of India Department Of Animal Husban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... are as follows: i) only registered fishing vessel, as on date, will be given permission i.e. a fishing vessel registered under section 11 of the marine products export development authority act, 1972 (central act 13 of 1972) as well as registered with the state government under its rules or regulations, presently in force in the state of tamil nadu. ii) the fisheries department ..... of this court1 in his favour. he had argued that this court in these two decisions had made adverse comments on purse seine fishing. all the same, considering the subsequent development since 1994 and the stand taken by the central government in their affidavits, based on which this restricted interim order is being made, the above two decisions are kept open .....

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Edhayam Frozen Foods

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (2005)(190)ELT72Tri(Chennai)

..... benefit of doubt to the assessees.3. on behalf of the respondents, learned senior advocate shri joseph vellapalli led the arguments. ld. counsel referred to the provisions of the apc act and the marine products export development authority act (mpeda act, for short). the apc act was enacted with the object of making better financial provision for the indian council agricultural research, the mpeda ..... basis of how it was known in common parlance. referring to the reliance placed by the lower appellate authorities on the definitions/descriptions used in the marine products export development authority act, sales tax act, etc., id. drs submitted that it was not open to those authorities to borrow anything from other statutes for the purpose of getting at the meaning of any term or expression .....

Michigan Vs. Long

Court : US Supreme Court

..... there is a vital difference between searches incident to lawful custodial arrests and terry protective searches. the court deliberately ignores that difference in relying on principles developed within the context of intrusions supported by probable cause to arrest to construct an "area search" rule within the context of a terry stop. the ..... does not mean that the police may conduct automobile searches whenever they conduct an investigative stop, although the "bright line" that we drew in belton clearly authorizes such a search whenever officers effect a custodial arrest. an additional interest exists in the arrest context, i.e., preservation of evidence, and this justifies ..... this case justified the officers in their reasonable belief that respondent posed a danger if he were permitted to reenter his vehicle. nor did they act unreasonably in taking preventive measures to ensure that there were no other weapons within respondent's immediate grasp before permitting him to reenter his automobile .....

Hercules, Inc. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... third-party costs as a matter of law. pp. 424-425. 418 syllabus (c) although the government required petitioner wm. t. thompson co. to produce agent orange under authority of the defense production act of 1950 (dpa) and threat of civil and criminal fines, imposed detailed specifications, had superior knowledge of the hazards, and, to a measurable extent, seized thompson's processing ..... indemnification could be provided to defense contractors); 10 u. s. c. 2354 (1956 statute authorizing indemnification provisions in contracts of a military department for research or development); 42 u. s. c. 2210 (indemnity scheme, first enacted statutes that expressly provide for the creation of indemnity agreements); the act bars agreements for which there has been no appropriation. we consider open-ended indemnification in .....

Birendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... of interpretation of statutes that the provisions of an act should be interpreted in such a manner as not to render any of its provisions otiose unless there are compelling reasons for the court to resort to that extreme contingency.'51. i may pause here to refer to lucknow development authority v. m. k. gupta, reported in ..... was passed giving regular promotion to the petitioner and the respondent xo. 3, the respondent no. 3 was sent, on deputation, as director, arunachal pradesh energy development agency and on completion of his deputation period, he was repatriated to the parent department, i.e., department of power with effect from 5.6.2002 and consequent ..... (3). hence the word 'appointment' appearing in sub-rule (2) or (3) will mean a temporary arrangement made, as a whole, by the government or the appointing authority under rule 28(1). the realistic interpretation of sub-rule (3) will, therefore, be that 'any appointment' means 'all' appointments made, in the context of one ad .....

Smt. A. Nagamani Vs. the Government of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Soc ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD352; 2008(3)ALT795

..... fours to petitions under article 226 as held in ibiza industries limited v. union of india : 1998(5)ald565 and followed in g. bharti devi v. hyderabad urban development authority w.p. no. 16005 of 2006 : 2008(2) alt 214. for that reason also this petition is liable to be dismissed, and so, this petition is dismissed ..... respect of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes or backward classes or in any enquiry conducted by the competent authority or the authority empowered to cancel the community certificate or the appellate authority under this act or in any trial or offence under this act, the burden of proving that he belongs to such caste, tribe or class shall be on ..... the committee and in exercise of the powers conferred by rule 5(1) of the andhra pradesh (sc/st/bcs) regulation to issue of community certificates act, 1993 (the act) the request of the petitioner for issuance of caste certificate as scheduled tribe was rejected and the order of the revenue divisional officer, srikakulam, dated 12. .....