Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Page 1 of about 200,366 results (0.676 seconds)

iol Limited Vs. S.C. Prasad and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR452; (1995)124CTR(Bom)64; [1996]217ITR52(Bom); 1995(1)MhLj346

..... case : [1992]197itr609(bom) , it was held by the division bench that the provisions of chapter xx-c of the income-tax act confer powers upon the authority only to determine whether the property agreed to be transferred should be purchased by the central government or not. it is neither the function ..... order, then it was futile for the transferor to apply for transfer of development rights in favour of the transferee. in our judgment, it was wholly irrelevant for the appropriate authority to examine whether the transferor could have transferred the development rights without the prior permission of the collector. 8. in this connection ..... the act. the permission is granted by the government after the realisation of difference in the price. the appropriate authority felt that unless the state government grants permission to transfer, it is not open to the petitioners to transfer development rights. the assumption of the authority is entirely erroneous and unsustainable. the authority overlooked .....

Shri Vishnu Maruti Ghosale, Vs. the Appropriate Authority (Under Incom ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR1230; (2006)200CTR(Bom)454; [2006]285ITR459(Bom); 2006(1)MhLj859

..... on the hilltop and the consideration shown in the said development agreement was rs. 80,00,000/-.3. the petitioners forwarded the said development agreement along with the requisite form no. 37-i to the competent authority seeking approval of the appropriate authority under chapter xx-c of the act. on february 9, 1995 a notice was issued under ..... properties.14. in view of our above finding, it is not necessary to go into the question as to whether the transfer of development rights is covered under chapter xx-c of the act or not.15. in the result, the petition succeeds. the impugned order dated february 23, 1995 is quashed and set aside. rule ..... petition is filed to challenge the order dated february 23, 1995, wherein, the appropriate authority has ordered pre-emptive purchase of the immovable property belonging to the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 under section 269ud(1) of the income tax act, 1961 ('act' for short). according to the petitioners the findings recorded in the impugned order that the .....

Goli Padmaraju and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD701

..... collector. in the said notification, total extent of ac.126.55 cents of land was notified for public purpose, namely, to wit for establishment of industrial development area, and, authorization was given to the third respondent-revenue divisional officer, peddapuram, and, his staff, to exercise powers under section 4(2) of the land acquisition ..... case, that as much as the land is not acquired for their company, the procedure as contemplated under chapter-vii of the land acquisition act, 1894, is not applicable. they also reiterated the authority of the district collector, basing on the g.o. issued by the government, delegating the powers to the district collector.7. the third ..... companies, and, to meet sudden demand in the industrial growth, urgency clause is invoked, by dispensing with the enquiry as contemplated under section 5a of the land acquisition act, 1894. in view of such urgency, it is not for the petitioners to say, that there is no urgency in the matter, so as to invoke urgency .....

Siris Aqua Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (2000)LC537Tri(Chennai)

..... artemia cysts (brine shirmp eggs).it was stated that as per the literature available in hand book on aqua farming "live feed" published by the marine products exports development authority, ministry of commerce, govt. of india the brine shrimp artemia is classified as live feed to over 85% acqua cultured species around the world, although several artificial ..... respectfully following the ratio of the judgment of hon'ble supreme court cited above, we find that the penalty cannot be imposed under section 112 of the customs act in this case. with respect to the claim of redemption fine also the hon'ble supreme court has held that heavy fine is unwarranted in these circumstances. therefore ..... -cause notice has invoked the provisions of section 111(m), however, in the order-in-original the goods have been confiscated under section 111(d) of the act. therefore, the department itself is not very clear as to on what grounds the item impugned has been confiscated. we also find that a similar issue was .....

Vokkaligara Sangha, by Its General Secretary, Dr. K. Mahadev Vs. the B ...

Court : Karnataka

..... layout, the court may not nullify the allotment made in favour of the 2nd respondent. 6. the 1st respondent is an authority created under the bangalore development authority act, 1976. the act was enacted to provide for the establishment of a development authority for the development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and for matters connected therewith. indisputedly, bda has a number of public duties ..... be by way of affixing a notice on the notice board of the office of bda and also by publishing in not less that two daily newspapers, in english and kannada, having wide circulation in the city of bangalore. rule 5 mandates that, every institution applying for civic amenity site shall register with bda on payment of prescribed fee, in the .....

Jai Ganesh SRA CHS (Prop.) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

..... pursuance of certificates which were issued under section 32g read with section 32m of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948 ("the tenancy act"). they are tribals. the maharashtra housing and area development authority claimed title under a deed of conveyance of 27th october, 1958 and had filed three writ petitions under article 226 ..... of the constitution interalia challenging the validity of the certificates which were issued under the tenancy act. defendants 1 to 8, 9 to 13 and ..... before the learned single judge were peculiar. though the lands were situate in village magathane, taluka borivli and they belong to maharashtra housing and area development authority (mhada), it is apparent from a reading of para 3 that ownership was claimed in these lands by defendant nos.1 to 18 to the .....

Harsh Vardhan Kejriwal Vs. Madhav Nagar Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(4)Raj3473

..... the defendant no. 5 co-operative society also submitted a site plan of the aforesaid colony in accordance with law with the jaipur development authority and the jaipur development authority approved the sub-division of the aforesaid land and the lay out plan on 11.7.1984 and as per the law applicable the ..... rajendrakumar shankerbhai bhagiya : (2003)2glr1066 , wherein the gujarat high court held as under:the expression 'touching' mentioned in section 167 of the gujarat cooperative societies act would mean 'concerning'. the expression 'business' mentioned in the said section could be interpreted to mean the 'actual trading or commercial or other similar business activity' ..... co-operative societies raising their rival claim over the land in question, the dispute would fall for determination in accordance with section 75 of the act alone and civil or revenue courts had no jurisdiction to decide such disputes.10. having considered the rival submissions and after giving any thoughtful .....

Confederation of Sadar Bazar Trader S Association (Regd.) vs.union of ...

Court : Delhi

..... is misreading of section 11 of the railway act as it does not give power and authority to railway administration to use the land area in question for any purpose by ignoring the provisions of mpd- 2021 / zonal development plan / redevelopment scheme. he referred to regulation 15 of the rail development authority (development of land and other works) regulations, 2012, ..... and the same would not depend upon the answer as to which department or authority is doing the construction or development work on the said land. he stated, if section 11 of the railway act is interpreted so as to override the dda act and mpd-2021 etc as contended by the counsel for the railways then regulation ..... north dmc that the change of land use has to be notified with the approval of the dda. he also relied upon regulation 15 of the rail development authority (development of land and other works) regulations, 2012 to contend that it is obligatory for the railways to comply with local master plan and building byelaws of .....

Radhaballav Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 100(2005)CLT527; 2005(I)OLR507

..... petitioner had filed ojc no. 7646 of 1998 before this court challenging the action taken by opposite party no. 2, puri-konark development authority, under section 91 of the orissa development authority act for demolition of a building constructed by him without obtaining due permission and/or sanction of plan, and also violating the provisions of ..... to the notice of the court that the construction was made without obtaining prior permission and/or had been made beyond the norms of the development authority act and that it grossly violated the provisions made in the coastal zone regulations. it was further alleged that under the cover of the interim order ..... court may take a liberal view and condone the delay in order to give substantial justice.3. on receiving notice, opposite party no. 2, puri-konark development authority, entered appearance through its counsel and filed a counter-affidavit opposing the prayer for condonation of delay.4. mr. patnaik, learned senior advocate appearing for the .....

Ram Nandan Prasad Sinha Vs. K.M. Consultants

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2002Bom90; 2002(2)BomCR585; (2002)1BOMLR153; 2002(1)MhLj600

..... enforce a right arising from a contract between the partners, the proceedings are barred by section 69(3) of the partnership act. the next decision cited by mr. thakkar i.e. delhi development authority v. kochhar construction work (supra) is equally inapplicable to the facts of the present case. in that case, the supreme court ..... or to have been a partner in the firm unless the firm is registered under the partnership act. mr. thakkar relied upon the decisions of the supreme court in jagdish chandra gupta v. kajaria traders (india) ltd., : [1964]8scr50 , and delhi development authority v. kochhar construction work, : (1998)8scc559 . he also relied upon the decision of ..... held that an application filed by an unregistered firm under section 20 of the arbitration act would also be treated as a suit and would .....