Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: kerala Page 1 of about 5,054 results (0.179 seconds)

P.Geetha Vs. The Kerala Livestock Development Board

Court : Kerala

..... dr.thushara james sri.p.gopinath sri.p.benny thomas sri.k.john mathai sri.joson manavalan sri.kuryan thomas respondents:1. the kerala livestock development board ltd., gokulam, pattom, thiruvananthapuram-695 004 represented by its managing director.2. state of kerala represented by the secretary to government, agricultural department ..... , article 3 thereof mandates that in all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration. the nations are required to take all appropriate legislative and ..... lawfulness of the exercise of administrative discretion is being considered.53. in gramophone co. of india ltd. v. birendra bahadur pandey12, under copy right act, 1957, the 12 (1984) 2 scc534wpc2068014 35 expression 'import' has fallen for interpretation. the question required to be decided was whether copy righted material .....

Rani Paul Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Kerala

..... disability or cerebral palsy. as per section 38, the government and local authorities shall formulate schemes for ensuring employment to the persons with disabilities. under section 41, the government and the local authorities shall, within the limits of their economic capacity and development, provide incentives to the employees both in public and private sectors to ..... potential of the issue to recur in the corporation, the issue is dealt with on merits, as well.20. firstly, the act, 1995 is gender neutral. in national legal services authority v. union of india3, the hon'ble supreme court has held that the universal declaration of human rights recognises that all human ..... ensure that at least five per cent of their work force is composed of persons with disabilities.29. under chapter viii of the act, sections 44 to .....

A.M. Mani Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board Represented by Its Secret ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ831Ker

..... arises between the board and the state government as to whether a question is or is not a question of policy, it shall be referred to the authority whose decision thereon shall be final.'on the terms of the section, the direction issued by the government may appertain to the discharge of the board's ..... and duties as implied by the marginal note to section 27. but in its ordinary sense, especially when used with reference to an authority, it generally means the functions which the authority was constituted to perform, what we might call its primary and essential functions, not incidental functions necessary for carrying on its essential functions. ..... section 27 stating that the board shall have 'such further powers and duties as are provided in this act'. the primary functions of the board are concerned with the generation distribution and utilisation of electricity, the development of water power etc. notwithstanding this indication in section 27 that the enumeration of the functions of the .....

Reliance Infocom Ltd. Vs. Chemanchery Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2007Ker33; 2006(4)KLT695

..... article 21 of the constitution. right to life enshrined under article 21 includes all those aspects of life which make life meaningful, complex and worth living. development of technology has its own ill-effects on human beings, but, at times people will have to put up with that at the cost of their advantages ..... limiting emf exposure. committee also reported that the protocols to be allowed and necessary guidelines for siting of mobile phone base stations may need to be developed as per its applicability for india. further it was also recommended that periodic review of the status of knowledge in this area should be done and ..... tia/is. petitioner has therefore necessarily to comply with those standards.7. the telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 has constituted the regulatory authority. section 11 of the act deals with powers and functions of the authority. section 12 confers power on the authority to call for information, conduct investigation etc. clause 9.1 of ext.p7 obliges .....

Kerala State Private Bus Operators, Represented by Its General Secreta ...

Court : Kerala

..... reference is made to the scope and power of the concerned respondents, as provided under section 64uc of the insurance act 1938 and the one available under section 14 of the insurance regulatory and development authority act, 1999. with regard to the loss of opportunity of hearing, it is stated that, none of the petitioners associations ..... in kerala was given any opportunity of hearing before ext. p2 notification was issued and as such, they did not get any chance to bring the actual facts and figures to the notice of the first respondent (irda ..... of ext. p2 notification (exhibits referred to as given in w.p. (c) 13288 of 2011) issued by the first respondent /insurance regulatory and development authority (irda in short), declaring the rates of insurance premium in respect of the motor third party insurance, to be made applicable w.e.f 25.04.2011. .....

K. Dakshayani Amma represented by her Authorised Attorney K. Rugmani V ...

Court : Kerala

..... state cannot be countenanced. in that case, the area was reserved for park and playground. section 38a of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 specifically prohibited that, the authority shall not sell or otherwise dispose of any area reserved for public parks and playgrounds and civic amenities for any other purpose ..... the area was reserved for park and playground. section 38a of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 specifically prohibited that the authority shall not sell or otherwise dispose of any area reserved for public parks and playgrounds and civic amenities for any other purpose ..... of the chief minister of the state. therefore, this court examined the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 and after considering all those provisions, this court held that this unilateral act of the bangalore development authority at the instance of the chief minister of the state cannot be countenanced. in that case, .....

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ218

..... the act says that it is necessary to make special provision to promote and assist the orderly establishment and rapid growth and ..... from the purview of the panchayat raj act. 'industrial area' has been defined in the development act (act 5 of 2000). the development act was enacted to provide special provision for speedy issue of various licence clearances and certificates required for setting up of industrial undertaking in the state of kerala and for the constitution of industrial township area development authorities and for matter connected therewith. preamble of .....

Abdul Azeez Vs. Kerala State Election Commission

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KarLJ7

..... municipal corporations then in force by a comprehensive enactment in line with the constitution (seventy fourth) amendment act, 1992 for securing greater measure of participation of the people in planned development and in local governmental affairs and to endow such municipalities with necessary powers and authority to enable them to function as institutions of self government. municipalities have been entrusted with the functions ..... of preparation of plans and implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice including the implementation of schemes in relation to matters listed in the twelfth schedule to the constitution .....

Satheesan Vs. Abdul Rahiman

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2003(3)KLT1119

..... s.c. 1409). the apex court in om prakash gupta v. ranbir b. goyal (2002 (2) s.c.c 256), while dealing with the provisions of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977 examined the question as to whether subsequent events could be taken into consideration, and held as follows: 'the ordinary rule of civil law is that the rights of the ..... building so as to get the benefit of the second limb of the second proviso to section 11(3) of the act. in such circumstances, we find no reason to take a different view from that of the appellate authority. the revision petition is accordingly dismissed. however, tenant is given time upto 31.12.2003 to vacate the premises on ..... derived from the business conducted in the scheduled building. we therefore agree with the view of the appellate authority that tenant is not entitled to get the benefit of the first limb of the second proviso to section 11(3) of the act.5. we may now examine whether tenant had discharged the burden of showing that there is no .....

Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Meenachil Co-operative Agr ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2005Ker76; 2004(3)KLT369

..... issue in the aforesaid background.10. since reliance has been placed by the bank on section 12(2) of the kerala state co-operative agricultural development bank act, the provision could be extracted herein below:'(2) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, a gehan created or mortgage ..... touching the root of the transaction had weakened the claims of the bank, to the advantage of the petitioner. the executive powers of the governmental authorities have been exercised without full application of mind and overlooking the provisions of the statute and objections raised.7. when the initial sale had been notified ..... were no bidders forthcoming, the first respondent -- bank themselves had purchased the properties in auction. such action under the provisions of act 20 of 1984 required confirmation by the notified authority. objections were filed before the joint registrar, in the above context, by the kerala state financial enterprises. however, he was not .....