Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: orissa Page 1 of about 2,469 results (0.073 seconds)

Mar 29 2005 (HC)

Radhaballav Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 100(2005)CLT527; 2005(I)OLR507

..... petitioner had filed ojc no. 7646 of 1998 before this court challenging the action taken by opposite party no. 2, puri-konark development authority, under section 91 of the orissa development authority act for demolition of a building constructed by him without obtaining due permission and/or sanction of plan, and also violating the provisions of ..... to the notice of the court that the construction was made without obtaining prior permission and/or had been made beyond the norms of the development authority act and that it grossly violated the provisions made in the coastal zone regulations. it was further alleged that under the cover of the interim order ..... court may take a liberal view and condone the delay in order to give substantial justice.3. on receiving notice, opposite party no. 2, puri-konark development authority, entered appearance through its counsel and filed a counter-affidavit opposing the prayer for condonation of delay.4. mr. patnaik, learned senior advocate appearing for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2005 (HC)

Smt. Sudhamayee Acharjya and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 101(2006)CLT110

..... conversion of public park into a private nursing home and the maintainability of a public interest litigation held that such an application is maintainable as under the bangalore development authority act, a private nursing home could neither be considered to be an amenity not it could be considered improvement over necessity like a public park. the exercise of ..... further sought for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the opp. parties 1 to 5 to strictly follow the master plan prepared under the orissa development authorities act, 1982 (for short 'o.d.a. act').2. it is the case of the petitioners that the above mentioned land was earmarked for construction of a bus stop in 1974 master ..... master plan was prepared and published in the year, 1994 as pleaded by the bhubaneswar development authority (for short 'b.d.a.'). he drew the attention of the court to the provisions of sections 69 & 70 of the o.d.a. act and submitted that though in section 70 it is provided that 30 percent of the land .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1994 (HC)

Binay Mahapatra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 78(1994)CLT901; 1994(II)OLR508

..... advocate tor the state reiterated their respective stands. according to mr. palit neither the orissa water supply and sewerage board act nor the orissa development authorities act confers any authority on the cuttack development authority of the board to . levy the front-end-fee as a condition precedent for processing an application for construction of ..... for construction of building. an application for sanction of plan for construction of building has to be dealt with by the development authority under the orissa development authorities act and if under the said act no power has been conferred to make the demand*, the demand must be held to be without jurisdiction. therefore, ..... issued such a direction in the purported exercise of power under section 23 of the orissa water supply and sewerage board act. then again, under the orissa development authorities act, 1982 (orissa act 14 of 1982). there is no provision which makes it obligatory on the part of a person intending to construct a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1998 (HC)

Smt. Sushila Devi Rungta Vs. State of Orissa, Through Chief Secretary, ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1999(I)OLR549

..... construction. in response to the said notice, smt. rungta submitted her show-cause and also a revised plan for approval in terms of section 16, of the orissa development authority act, 1982. in the meantime, shri jagannath das filed title suit no. 21 of 1996 in the court of civil judge, senior division, rourkela for a declaration that ..... smt. rungta on the disputed plot. on the basis of such complaint the rourkela development authority (hereinafter referred to as the 'rda') issued notice no. 198/rda, under sections 31(3) and 33(1) of the orissa town planning and improvement trust act, 1956 asking her to stop further construction and to show cause within 7 days why ..... existence. it appears that smt. rungta by her letter dated november 22, 1996 expressly accepted the order of the appellate authority and practically invited the r.d.a. to take proper action in accordance with the provisions of development act, 1982 (annexure - k/3) to the counter affidavit of opp. parties 3 and 4. in the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2002 (HC)

Puri-konark Development Authority Vs. Ratna Bhadra and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2002Ori207; 94(2002)CLT95; 2002(II)OLR128

..... development authority, a creature of the orissa development authorities act (hereinafter called 'the oda act' for brevity), has filed this writ application under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india seeking a declaration that the civil courts have no jurisdiction to examine any order passed under section 91 of the oda act ..... and / or pass any order of injunction restraining the statutory authorities ..... even otherwise, it is submitted by mr. padhi that in the case at hand, the civil court acted illegally and contrary to law in restraining the development authority, which is a statutory authority, from exercising the statutory powers conferred on it under a statute. in support of his contention, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1998 (HC)

Manindra Kumar Ray and ors. Vs. Bhubaneshwar Development Authority and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1998Ori141

..... arc inter-linked and arc disposed of by this common judgment. petitioner in each case had applied for permission in terms of the orissa development authorities act, 1982 (in short, the 'act') for development of the land by construction of building.2. factual position so far as undisputed is as follows:application was filed for approval of plan ..... done so. it was pointed that the regulations as referred to in section 16 of the act have been made by the b.d.a. with previous approval of the stale government and the said regulations are called the bhubaneswar development authority (planning and building standards) regulations. 1993 (in short, the 'regulations'). with reference to the ..... is of no consequences.the stand of bhubaneshwar development authority (in short, 'bda') is to the effect that section 16 has no operation to multi-stories buildings, and in any event the notice purported to have been given under sub-section (7) of section 16 of the act had not been placed before the vice-chairman .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2002 (HC)

Chitta Ranjan Sahu Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 93(2002)CLT163

..... the application of the notified area council is baseless.5. the tamrit is a statutory authority constituted under the provisions of the orissa town planning & improvement trust act, 1956. it may be noted that the aforesaid orissa town planning & improvement trust act, 1956 has been repealed by the orissa development authorities act, 1982 and the state government in exercise of its power under section 3(1 ..... ) of the 1982 act has declared the talcher-angul-meramundali complex shall be assigned the same 'talcher-angul development area' with effect from 12.12.1989. 6. it is the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1986 (HC)

Sakuntala Garabadu and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 62(1986)CLT71; 1986(I)OLR631

..... under article 226 of the constitution of india impugning the orders dated 8.2.1984 (annexure-10 series) passed by the bhubaneswar development authority under section 91 (1) of the orissa development authorities act, 1962 directing removal of certain constructions alleged to have been made unauthorisedly and the order dated 30.4.1984 (annexure-ii) in ..... bhubaneswar and the plan had been sanctioned. renewal had been obtained by their predecessors-in-interest year after year. the orissa development authorities act came into force with effect from 1.9.1983. the alleged unauthorised constructions had been completed prior, to the coming into force of the ..... act. notices, however, were issued by the opposite party no. 3 under section 91(1) of the orissa development authorities act (for short, 'the act'), vide annexure-8. alleging that the development had been undertaken in respect of the premises described in the schedule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2008 (HC)

National Aluminium Company Limited and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and or ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(1)OLR443; (2008)15VST296(Orissa)

..... intra-state trade and commerce for providing various trading facilities to the trading community of different statutes like the orissa development authority act, 1982, orissa municipal corporation act, orissa municipal act, orissa zilla parishad act, orissa panchayat samiti act, gram panchayat act. under the above mentioned statutes, provisions of the establishment of market place, shopping complex, village market, hata, ..... india is made exclusively to pass any legislation to augment the income of the local authorities and by the definition of 'local area' given in the act, the entire state has been brought under the purview of the act and hence it is a colourable exercise of power.3. after hearing learned counsel ..... in section 36, it has been indicated that there shall be paid to each local authority every year such sum as may be determined by the state government from out of the tax collected under this act, subject to such conditions and in such manner as may be prescribed. but nothing has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2010 (HC)

Swapan Ghosh and ors. Vs. Cuttack Development Authority and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... comes within the jurisdiction of an urban local body and also within a development area under the provisions of the orissa development authorities act, there the provisions of both the orissa development authorities act and the orissa municipal act or the municipal corporation act, as the case may be, shall apply. the application of both the acts is not alternative but simultaneous. this is amply made clear from the non ..... the construction of the telephone tower in question is coming within the meaning of 'operational construction' as defined in the orissa development authorities act,1982 (in short "the act") and, therefore, no permission from the c.d.a. under section 15 of the act is required. it is also stated that for the purpose of removal of the construction in question, which has been undertaken .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //