Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 4,037 results (0.089 seconds)

Harsh Vardhan Kejriwal Vs. Madhav Nagar Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(4)Raj3473

..... the defendant no. 5 co-operative society also submitted a site plan of the aforesaid colony in accordance with law with the jaipur development authority and the jaipur development authority approved the sub-division of the aforesaid land and the lay out plan on 11.7.1984 and as per the law applicable the ..... rajendrakumar shankerbhai bhagiya : (2003)2glr1066 , wherein the gujarat high court held as under:the expression 'touching' mentioned in section 167 of the gujarat cooperative societies act would mean 'concerning'. the expression 'business' mentioned in the said section could be interpreted to mean the 'actual trading or commercial or other similar business activity' ..... co-operative societies raising their rival claim over the land in question, the dispute would fall for determination in accordance with section 75 of the act alone and civil or revenue courts had no jurisdiction to decide such disputes.10. having considered the rival submissions and after giving any thoughtful .....

Chaitanya Prakash Vs. Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1960Raj185

..... arguments raised on behalf of the petitioner, it will be useful to refer to the relevant provisions of the act and the regulations. the preamble of the act shows that the act was enacted with a view to developing the system of secondary education in the state of rajasthan on modern, scientific and progressive lines, and for that ..... observations, it cannot be said that so far as the petitioner is concerned, the board had any legal authority over him. there is nothing in the act or the regulations which conferred on the board any authority over the petitioner. the petitioner had full freedom to get himself registered or not with the board. the ..... purpose, it was thought expedient to provide for the establishment of the board to reorganise, regulate and supervise such education. under section 3 of the act, the state government was authorized to establish, .....

Shri Manshapuran Hanumanji Ka Vikas Samiti Through Baba Shri Hanumanth ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2000Raj389; 2000(3)WLC1; 2001(1)WLN663

..... of land without any permission and unauthorisedly. this court shall not encourage such kind of encroachment and construction upon public land.4. section 72 of the jaipur development authority act, 1982 is very clear on this aspect. the section says; whoever makes any encroachment in any land or space not belngprtvate property, whether such land or ..... perusal of the record that the land in dispute was allocated and earmarked for construction of a nursery and a boundary wall was also erected by the jaipur development authority. however, before any further work could be commenced, a temple came to be erected on the above strip of land by the appellant-society, alleged ..... to any other person and that the same should be allotted to the appellant-petitioner society.2. in the reply to the stay petition, the jaipur development authority have questioned the locus standi of the appellant in maintaining the writ petition and that thewrit petition should be dismissed at the threshold in favour of the .....

Ram Chandra Kasliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1788; 2004(4)WLC17

..... thereto is ousted by part ixa of the constitution and the rm act. it was contended that in any event, there is no provision in the jaipur development authority act, 1982 (for short hereinafter 'jda act') similar to the provisions of the rm act which provides for construction/alteration/widening of the streets and prescribe the ..... regular line of houses. it was also submitted that the la act is a general law dealing with acquisition, while the rm act is a special ..... to the power usually given to municipalities to frame by-laws.a submission of the learned counsel was that the delhi development act itself referred in several places to local authorities as distinguished from delhi development authority. it is true that in sections 12, 15, 30, 31, 34, 36, 42 and some other provisions we .....

Smt Geeta Devi. Vs. J D a and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

1. instant petition is directed against judgment dt.02/03/2009 (ann.16) whereby the jaipur development authority appellate tribunal dismissed appeal (no.121/2008) preferred by petitioner against notice served u/s 72 of jaipur development authority act, 1982 (jda act).2. as alleged, petitioner purchased a plot no.33 (measuring 235 sq. yards), in tagore nagar ..... the society and from whom it was transferred to the petitioner. it has come on record that the society has never submitted such scheme before jaipur development authority under the name of tagore nagar extension; in absence of society having held any title, allotment of plot no.33 as claimed by petitioner in ..... was not holding any valid title and in such circumstances, indisputably petitioner is an encroacher and the authority has rightly served notice impugned upon her for removal of encroachment u/s 72 of the jda act. as regards submission made on which counsel for petitioner laid much thrust that the petitioner holding possession .....

Jaipur Development Authority Vs. Shyam Lal Verma

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1994(2)WLN267

..... was also contested on the ground that no contract had come into existence between the parties and that the suit was barred in view of section 99 of the jaipur development authority act. in was also pleaded that the suit was barred by time and that the plaintiff had also filed a suit for injunction against the defendant and had not sought ..... their learned counsel, the learned trial court held that the suit was within time and that it was not barred either in view of section 99 of the jaipur development authority act or by order 2 rule 2 of the code and that the plaintiff had not received any information from the defendant in regard to the acceptance of the bid and ..... 4th amount deposited by him he could have filed an appeal under sub-section (8) of section 83 of the jaipur development authority act, 1982 (the jda act) and that the suit was barred in view of section 99 of the said act and as such the learned trial court had no jurisdiction to try the suit and grant the relief to the plaintiff. .....

Pawan Kumar and 6 ors. Vs. Jaipur Development Authority

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1994(1)WLC132; 1993WLN(UC)475

..... no jurisdiction to issue notices for demolition after expiry of 3 years in accordance with the provisions of section 32 of the jaipur development authority act and since construction is prior to 3 years' period, the show cause notices issued are without jurisdiction. another point which has been raised is that since the j ..... the construction is more than 3 years old and, therefore, the power for demolition cannot be exercised is concerned, the j.d.a. - act has provided remedy of appeal before the jaipur development authority tribunal and few of the petitioners have already availed it. it will not be proper for this court to give a finding and entertain the writ ..... .6. an application was moved for conversion of the land use and a representation was also submitted to the then minister concerned on 25.1.1985. the jaipur development authority has written a letter on 21.3.1985 that the land cannot be converted for residential purposes as it is reserved for nursery.7. in the present matter, in .....

The Jaipur Development Authority Vs. Prahlad Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)764

..... (1), 32(7) and 22(2)of the act for raising unauthorised construction/development and using the land otherwise than in confirmity with the plan inspite of the ..... the learned special additional chief judicial magistrate, j.d.a. act cases jaipur, dated 28-8-1985 in cr. case no. 323/84, whereby he acquitted the accused respondent from the charge for offence under section 32(7) of the jaipur development authority act (here in after called the act). the accused respondent was charged for offence under section 31 ..... section 468, cr. pc do not apply at all to the present case. it has been provided in section 33(2) of the act that any person who continues to carry out the development of land, other person, after such notice has been served, shall on conviction, be punished with fine which may extend to rs. 5 .....

Eih Associated Hotels Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1830

..... final directions dated 17.3.2005 and without considering the statutory flavour of the ecological zone attached to it as per section 25 of the jaipur development authority act, 1982 (in short the jda act). as regards challenge to the order of the tribunal as well as the aforesaid impugned order of inviting objections and finalisation of the same, other ..... preservation of the ecological area but the j.d.a, appellate tribunal has ignored the same and the jaipur development authority has also acted contrary to the provisions of section 25(1) and 25(2) of the j.d.a act, 1982. he also submits that the decision of the regularisation of land as well as building in the ..... the standards to be adhered to by the respondent authorities in respect of the user, developedment and allotment, of land. the allotment has to take place under the rules. the master plan and the zonal development plan have statutory flavour and the provision is made in the said act itself as to the manner in which they have .....

Ratan Lal Soni Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1994(1)WLC679; 1993WLN(UC)194

..... the law and the rules. sub-section (2) of section 25 of the jaipur development authority act states that the authority with the approval of the state government may make any other modifications into the plan in order to promote planned development of any part of the jaipur region in more efficient manner.20. the learned counsel ..... of the writ petition, the petitioner alleged that the hindi daily rajasthan patrika in its issue dated 21.8.1989 published a news item that the jaipur development authority (hereinafter to be refereed to as 'the j.d.a.') approved schemes of three housing cooperative societies ignoring all the relevant rules and regulations in that ..... by personal animosity towards those who are directly affected by its exercise.... the administrative discretion means power of being administratively discreet. it implies authority to do an act or to decide a matter a discretion.38. mere assertion or a vague or bald statement is not sufficient to prove the allegation against an .....