Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 231 results (0.157 seconds)

Sunderlal Patel and Another Vs. The High Court of Chhattisgarh, throug ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... this regard. they only pleaded that handsome compensation in lakhs be awarded for violation of their personal liberty, by the respondent state. 42. in the matter of lucknow development authority v. m.k. gupta (1994(1) scc 243 : air 1994 sc 787), the supreme court has held that when the court directs payment of damages or compensation ..... for each other's torts and, perhaps, the liability of a principal for the torts of his agent. same author while dealing with scope of employment in paragraph 20.9 held that it is necessary that the acts done by the servant within the scope of his employment constitute an actionable wrong in themselves . 39. thus, ..... upholding the conviction. the registry of respondent no.1 immediately, on 25-6-2013, dispatched the copy of the judgment dated 18-6-2013 to the special judge (ndps act), janjgir-champa; to the chief judicial magistrate, janjgir; and to the superintendent, central jail, bilaspur, where the accused persons/petitioners herein were confined; and also to .....

Savita Manoj Kumar (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT69(CG)

..... .8. the circular of annexure p-3 issued by the state government and circular of annexure p-2 issued by the project officer, integrated child development project, only mentions that the employees of government or panchayat institutions or relatives of elected and nominated members of the said institution would not be appointed ..... by the additional collector, raigarh.3. briefly stated, facts of the case are that applications for appointment on the post of aanganbadi worker were invited by the development project officer, gram panchayat garhumaria, district raigarh and the petitioner, respondent no. 6 and others submitted their applications. after scrutiny of applications, gram panchayat vide ..... of the act provides that if a person happens to be relative of any office bearer of concerned gram panchayat, he shall not hold the charge of secretary. the intention behind making the above provisions is to ensure that the office bearer of the panchayat is not permitted to use his authority to extend .....

Yashwant Kumar Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT79(CG)

..... promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and in particular the constitutionally downtrodden. the concept of sustainable development which emerges as a fundamental duty from the several clauses of article 51-a too dictates the expansion of population being kept within reasonable bounds. it ..... shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), cease to be such office bearer and his office shall become vacant.(3) in every case the authority competent to decide whether a vacancy has occurred under sub-section (2) shall be collector in respect of gram panchayat and janpad panchayat and commissioner in respect ..... of the panchayat were elected at that time this provision of disqualification was not in existence, therefore, after their valid election, by amending the panchayat act, such provision can not be inserted which disqualify then from holding the office of office bearer of panchayat being violative of the constitution. but we are .....

Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services, Inc ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2005Chh21; 2006(1)MPHT18(CG)

..... (2) cal lj 197 (cal)) (supra) cited by mr. mukherjee an agreement dated 28-9-1989 was executed in india between coal india limited and white industries australia limited for developing an open cast coal mine at piparwar in india. clauses 3.2 and 4.1 in the said agreement provided as follows :'3.2 should the parties fail to reach ..... the case of the appellant is that the award was made under the law of india and accordingly under section 48(1)(e) of the indian act the court in india is the competent authority to set aside or suspend the awards, the case of the respondent is that the two awards have been made in england and under the law ..... be separated from those not so submitted, that part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be enforced; or(d) the composition of the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, or, failing such agreement was not in accordance with the law of the country where the .....

V.T.P. Constructions Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : [2006]145STC185(NULL)

..... in ignorance in terms of a statute, or of a rule having the force of a statute. in view of the judgments of the supreme court in punjab land development & reclamation corporation ltd. v. presiding officer, labour court : (1990)iillj70sc , commissioner for hindu religious and endowments v. c. lakshminarasinhaiah (1990) supp. scc 164 ..... other law or contract to the contrary, any person responsible for paying any sum to any contractor (hereinafter referred to in this section as the 'deducting authority') for carrying out any works contract, which involves transfer of property in goods, in pursuance of a contract between the contractor and--(a) central government ..... or any state government, or(b) any local authority, or(c) any authority or corporation established by or under a statute, or(d) any company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956) including any state or central government undertaking, or(e) any co-operative .....

Sonalal Soni Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4461

..... against them, which alleged to have been taken place after the murder of somesh soni.the petitioner sent various letters (annexure p-2) to the respondents' authorities for not conducting fair investigations of the murder of somesh soni, and for not collecting entire evidence available in connection with the murder of somesh soni. therefore, ..... and will not undermine the credibility of the complaint and evidence of the prosecutrix does not require any corroboration. section 114a was inserted in the evidence act to create a statutory presumption against consent, thereby casting the burden on the defendant in a trial to prove consent. in the year 1996 in one ..... the system is focused upon the rights of the accused rather than rights of victim. the united states realizing this difficulty passed the victims and witness protection act of 1982, which contains the provisions of restitution to crime victims and the inclusion of a victim impact statement as a pre-sentence report. then again .....

M/S Bharat Aluminium Company. Vs. Engineering Projects India, and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... clear that certain questions were intended to be excluded from the arbitrator's jurisdiction..." 49. the supreme court in j.k. jain and others v. delhi development authority and others14, observed as under : "7. it is true that there must be an arbitration agreement, to confer jurisdiction on the arbitrator to hear and decide ..... refer the dispute to arbitration can clearly be ascertained from the terms of the agreement. the arbitration agreement is different from the agreement under the contract act. the arbitration agreement does not classify the right of the parties under the contract, but it relates wholly determining the rights. 47. contention of the ..... specifically enforced and breach of such terms of contract results only in damages. the arbitration clause however can be specifically enforced by the machinery of the arbitration act. the appropriate remedy for breach of an agreement to arbitrate is enforcement of the agreement to arbitrate and not to damages arising out of such breach. .....

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation Vs. M/s. Raipur Developmen ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... nivesh adhiniyam, 1973 and in exercise of power conferred under section 85 read with section 76(b)(2) of the act, 1973, the state government framed rules known as m.p. development authority services (officers and servants) recruitment rules, 1988 and by virtue of rule 27 of the said rules, contributory provident ..... ata/113(8)/08 holding that by virtue of provisions contained in section 16(1)(c) of the epf act, 1952 respondent- raipur development authority (for short rda) is exempted from the operation of epf act, 1952. (3) imperative facts necessary for judging the legality, validity and correctness of the impugned order and ..... organization established and constituted by the central government in accordance with the provisions of epf act, 1952 for the effective administration of the pension and insurance scheme. (3.2) the respondent m/s raipur development authority is a development authority, established and constituted by the state government in exercise of power conferred under sections .....

NitIn Sinha Vs. Union of India Through: Its Secretary, Ministry of Per ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... individually aggrieved can apply for issuance of the same (vide: university of mysore vs- govinda rao, c.d., air 1965 sc 491 ; jagram vs- gwalior town and country development authority, air 1987 mp 11 and venkateswara rao, godde vs- govt. of a.p., air 1966 sc 828). (17) in university of mysore (supra), also quoted in central ..... to judge the suitability or eligibility of the candidate. it completely falls within the domain of the appointing authority and the state. in this connection, our scrutiny is limited to see that the provisions of concerned act(s) or statutory rules are not violated and a public post(s) or a public office is not ..... him are cadre post(s). therefore, his appointment on the cadre post(s) is illegal and void. reference was made to various provisions of all india services act, 1951 (for short the act 1951); indian administrative service (cadre) rules, 1954 (for short the rules 1954) and indian administrative service (fixation of cadre strength) regulations, 1955 (for .....

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dasru Patel and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2011AIR(Chhat)149

..... is set down hereunder:- respondent no. 1 instituted a claim petition before the permanent lok adalat, bilaspur under section 22- a of the legal services authority act, 1987 (briefly `the act of 1987') claiming amount of rs. 5,50,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident dated 1-3-2008 ..... or matters relating to an offence not compoundable under any law by means of amicable settlement. 9. chapter vi-a of the act was substituted by amendment of the legal services authorities act brought about in the year 2002. section 22a(a) defines permanent lok adalat as one established under sub-section (1) of ..... the considered opinion of this court, the permanent lok adalat constituted under section 22-b of the legal services authorities act, 1987 has no jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate the motor accident compensation claim under the motor vehicles act, 1988. 18. for the reasons mentioned hereinabove, the writ petitions are allowed. the impugned orders are quashed .....