Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!