Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... v. state of u.p.,air1966sc1471 k. ramanathan v. state of t.n. (1985) 2 scc116 d.k. trivedi and sons v. state of gujarat, 1986 supp scc2017 26. in state of jammu and kashmir v lakhwinder kumar and ors., (2013) 6 scc333 this court held that when a general power to make regulations ..... of misconduct, it establishes a framework for accountability, reinforcing the credibility of individual professionals and the reputation of the entire profession. to achieve these goals, the act includes a disciplinary mechanism, ensuring a fair and transparent process for investigating and adjudicating alleged cases of misconduct.37. seen in this background, we have not ..... schedule or in both the schedules, he shall place the matter before the disciplinary committee. (4) in order to make investigations under the provisions of this act, the disciplinary directorate shall follow such procedure as may be specified. (5) where a complainant withdraws the complaint, the director (discipline) shall place such withdrawal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... jurisdiction. the court, in extraordinary circumstances, may exercise the power if it comes to the conclusion that there has been a breach of principles of natural justice or 7 7 procedure required for decision has not been adopted. the rule of exclusion of writ jurisdiction by availability of alternative remedy is a rule of ..... would originally have been thought when i first practiced at the bar, administrative. it is not intended to take away from those authorities the powers and 22 1986 ac240 251: (1986) 1 all er19923 (1982) 3 all er141 154 discretions properly vested in them by law and to substitute the courts as the bodies making the decisions. ..... filed for the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights or where there has been a violation of the principle of natural justice or where the order or proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction or the vires of an act is challenged. in the said decision, reliance was also placed on rashid ahmad vs. municipal board, kairana, [air1950sc163, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... jurisdiction. the court, in extraordinary circumstances, may exercise the power if it comes to the conclusion that there has been a breach of principles of natural justice or 7 7 procedure required for decision has not been adopted. the rule of exclusion of writ jurisdiction by availability of alternative remedy is a rule of ..... would originally have been thought when i first practiced at the bar, administrative. it is not intended to take away from those authorities the powers and 22 1986 ac240 251: (1986) 1 all er19923 (1982) 3 all er141 154 discretions properly vested in them by law and to substitute the courts as the bodies making the decisions. ..... filed for the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights or where there has been a violation of the principle of natural justice or where the order or proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction or the vires of an act is challenged. in the said decision, reliance was also placed on rashid ahmad vs. municipal board, kairana, [air1950sc163, .....
Tag this Judgment!