Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: juvenile justice act 1986 repealed chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 1,794 results (0.137 seconds)

Aug 29 2016 (HC)

N. Gowthaman @ Babu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by i ...

Court : Chennai

..... a sessions judge. 32. the madras children act, 1920, was repealed after the parliament passed the juvenile justice act, 1986 (central act 53 of 1986), which was repealed by act 56 of 2000 and now, the central act 56 of 2000 has been repealed by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015 (act 2 of 2016) with effect from 01.01 ..... .2016. 33. we have extracted the provisions of the juvenile justice act only to drive ..... , but, it only altered the age in section 10-a pursuant to the coming into force of the juvenile justice act, 1986. 72. the legislature did not choose to amend section 8 of the borstal schools act either in 1939 when section 10-a was introduced nor subsequently in 1989, when the age was changed, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .46 in shayara bano v. union of india,47 in testing the validity of section 2 of the muslim personal law (shariat) application act, 1937 which validates the triple talaq, justice r.f. nariman endorsed the test of manifest arbitrariness. it was held: the test of manifest arbitrariness, therefore, as laid down in ..... that delhi police shall periodically audit/review the contents of the history sheets and will ensure confidentiality and a leeway to delete the names of such persons/juveniles/children who are, in the course of investigation, found innocent and are entitled to be expunged from the category of relations and connections in a history ..... injustices and for righting fundamental wrongs with fundamental rights. the constitution of india is the 32 (2017) 10 scc133 2018 insc79034 ibid [chief justice dipak misra and justice khanwilkar]. 35 ibid [justice chandrachud]. 36 ibid 37 (2019) 11 scc114 part iv end product of both these struggles. it is the foundational document, which in text .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2024 (SC)

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to physical, sexual and emotional abuse. institutions which house them or persons in care and protection, if come across any act of sexual abuse, have a duty to bring to the notice of the juvenile justice board/sjpu or local police and they in turn be in touch with the competent authority and take appropriate action. ..... scpcr, child welfare committee (cwc) and child helpline, ngos or women's organisations, etc., they may take further follow-up action in consultation with the nearest juvenile justice board, sjpu or local police in accordance with law. 77.8. the central government and the state governments are directed to constitute sjpus in all the districts, ..... with moderate intellectual disability, non- reporting of offence of rape committed on her, after having witnessed the incident either to the local police or to the juvenile justice board compel us to give certain directions for compliance in future which, in my view, are necessary to protect our children from such sexual abuses. this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2024 (SC)

The State Of Punjab Vs. Davinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... protection to the scheduled castes as a homogenous group, which cannot be regrouped in the manner in which it was done by the andhra pradesh act. justice sinha noted that scheduled castes constitute a class of persons entitled to special protection and could not be discriminated inter se, as all of them ..... 22 points. the difference in their backwardness is, therefore, substantial. yet another illustration which may be given is from karnataka state government order dated october 13, 1986 on reservations issued after the decision in vasanth kumar [1985 supp scc714:1985. supp 1 scr352 where the backward classes are grouped into five categories, viz., ..... 22 points. the difference in their backwardness is, therefore, substantial. yet another illustration which may be given is from karnataka state government order dated october 13, 1986 on reservations issued after the decision in vasanth kumar [1985 supp scc714:1985. supp 1 scr352 where the backward classes are grouped into five categories, viz., .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2024 (SC)

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... ; hindalco industries ltd. v. state of up, civil appeal no.3869 of 2014. 7 section 89, bihar coal mining area development authority act 1986. [it reads: levy of tax on use of land for other than agricultural and residential purposes (1) the authority shall subject to the provisions of this ..... it allowed the municipalities to tax lands covered by coal mines, which were the subject of legislation by parliament under the mmdr act and the coal mines (nationalisation) act 1973355. chief justice y v chandrachud, speaking for the majority, rejected the contention on the ground that the tax on lands and buildings had nothing ..... conclusions ................................................................. 181 civil appeal nos.4056-4064 of 1999 etc. page 6 of 193 i have perused the comprehensive opinion authored by hon ble the chief justice of india dr dhananjaya y chandrachud on the questions referred to this nine-judge bench. i respectfully dissent with the said opinion and express my reasons .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2024 (SC)

Sunita Devi Vs. The State Of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... persons eligible for appointment as a non-judicial member by virtue of experience of criminal prosecution include the director of public prosecutions. section 120 of the coroner and justice act, 2009 guidelines 120 sentencing guidelines (1) in this chapter sentencing guidelines means guidelines relating to the sentencing of offenders. (2) a sentencing guideline may be ..... and their relative effectiveness in preventing re-offending; (f) the results of the monitoring carried out under section 128. 67 section 121 of the coroner and justice act, 2009 121 sentencing ranges (1) when exercising functions under section 120, the council is to have regard to the desirability of sentencing guidelines which relate ..... so would vitiate the trial and the resultant conviction and sentence, if any, given to the accused (see suk das v. ut of arunachal pradesh [(1986) 2 scc401:1986. scc (cri) 166]. ).478. but the failure to provide a lawyer to the accused at the pre-trial stage may not have the same consequence .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2024 (SC)

Bar Of Indian Lawyers Through Its President Jasbir Sigh Malik Vs. D.k. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... justice and fair treatment in the matter of goods and services purchased and availed by them in a market dominated by large trading and manufacturing bodies.13. after several years of passing of the cp act 1986, still many shortcomings in the said act were noticed while administering various provisions of the said act. hence, the cp act 1986 ..... exploitation of consumers; and (f) right to consumer education. 2 (2021) 20 scc4015 12. the idea behind the consumer protection act from 1986 till today has been to help the consumers get justice and fair treatment in matters of goods and services purchased and availed of by them in a market dominated by large trading and ..... manufacturing bodies. the entire act revolves around the consumer and is designed to protect their interests.13. leaving aside india for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2024 (SC)

Child In Conflict With Law Through His Mother Vs. The State Of Karnata ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... provisions of various statutes and the rules applicable in the matter are extracted below: extracts of relevant provisions of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015 section 2(10). board means a juvenile justice board constituted under section 4. section 2(13). "child in conflict with law means a child who is alleged ..... decisions of this court. 9.16 this court in topline shoes ltd vs corporation bank17 while interpretating section 13(2)(a) of the repealed consumer protection act, 1986 prescribing time limit for filing reply to the complaint, held the same to be directory in nature. relevant para 11 thereof is extracted below: 11. ..... judicial magistrate or, as the case may be, the chief metropolitan magistrate. (ii) the words children s court and court of sessions in juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015 and the 2016 rules shall be read interchangeably. primarily jurisdiction vests in the children s court. however, in the absence of constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2024 (HC)

Surya And Co Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the police officer to take such other steps consistent with law and with the orders of his superiors to bring the offenders to justice. section 65(g) of the act provides that police officer shall aid another police officer when called on by him or in the case of need in the discharge of his duty, in ..... 13.9. the functions of the judiciary and the police are complementary, not overlapping. 4613.10. save in exceptional cases where non-interference would result in miscarriage of justice, the court and the judicial process should not interfere at the stage of investigation of offences. 13.11. extraordinary and inherent powers of the court do not confer an ..... is not done, there are 59 all chances of the offender succeeding in escaping from the clutches of law, which could be detriment to the cause of the justice. if the court is satisfied that allegations made and materials collected prima facie make out an offence, the court should normally not interfere with the investigation into the offence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2024 (SC)

Fertilizer Corporation Of India Ltd. Vs. M/s. Coromandal Sacks Private ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the andhra pradesh high court which enunciates that an independent transaction de hors the scheme obviously cannot thus be covered within the ambit of section 22 of the 1985 act .9. justice lahoti's view has also been followed by a single bench of the calcutta high court in fort william industries limited v. usha bentron limited, [2002]. 108 ..... the decisions in gram panchayat (supra) and maharashtra tubes (supra) and held thus: 13. on a fair reading of the provisions contained in chapter iii of act 1 of 1986 and in particular sections 15 to 22, we are of the opinion that the plea put forward by the revenue is reasonable and fair in all the circumstances ..... of fertiliser to their customers. they had been placing orders for the civil appeal nos. 5366-5367 of 2024 page 3 of 91 same with the original plaintiff since 1986-87 onwards. the terms and conditions including the technical specifications of the bags and terms of payment were specified in the notices inviting tender ( nit ) issued from .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //