Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: juvenile justice act 1986 repealed chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 1,772 results (0.146 seconds)

N. Gowthaman @ Babu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by i ...

Court : Chennai

..... a sessions judge. 32. the madras children act, 1920, was repealed after the parliament passed the juvenile justice act, 1986 (central act 53 of 1986), which was repealed by act 56 of 2000 and now, the central act 56 of 2000 has been repealed by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015 (act 2 of 2016) with effect from 01.01 ..... .2016. 33. we have extracted the provisions of the juvenile justice act only to drive ..... , but, it only altered the age in section 10-a pursuant to the coming into force of the juvenile justice act, 1986. 72. the legislature did not choose to amend section 8 of the borstal schools act either in 1939 when section 10-a was introduced nor subsequently in 1989, when the age was changed, .....

Kamil Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT(Cri)20; 1994CriLJ1491

..... 12-6-3991, is against law and the lower court has erred in holding that the provisions of juvenile justice act, are not applicable.5. learned counsels referred to the provisions of juvenile justice act 1986, children act 1960, and u.p, children act 1951. it was conceded before me that juvenile justice act, 1986, came into force subsequent to the occurrence in the present case. according to the averments made in para ..... of the child.39. the juvenile justice act 1986, also contains identical provisions for welfare of juveniles. section 24 of the juvenile justice act prohibits joint trial of the juvenile and a person not a juvenile. this provision is, thus, different from section 63 of the u.p. children act. the scheme of the u.p. children act, 1951, and juvenile justice act, 1986 emphasise special treatement of the children and juveniles with the object of their .....

Ravinder Kumar @ Ravi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ27

..... relating to and disposition of, delinquent juveniles.9. sub-section (e) of section 2 of the juvenile justice act, 1986 defined 'delinquent juvenile' as:(e) 'delinquent juvenile' means a juvenile who has been found to have committed an offence.10. sub-section (h) of section 2 of the act defined 'juvenile' as:(h) 'juvenile' means a boy who has not ..... the offenders and the offence.7. in the above background, the juvenile justice bill, 1986 was passed by both the houses of parliament. after receiving the assent of the president, it came on the statute book as the juvenile justice act, 1986 (53 of 1986). its statement of objects and reasons aimed at achieving the following objectives ..... :(i) to lay down a uniform legal framework for juvenile justice in the country so as to ensure that no child under any circumstances .....

Chagalamarri Subbaiah and ors. Vs. State Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2010CriLJ655

..... situations that arise in handing the problems, the situation would certainly be very much eased.17. after a review of the working of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (for short '1986 act') the legislature thought that greater attention is required to be given to children in conflict with law or those in need of care and protection. ..... on the part of the learned magistrate to refer the case to a juvenile court for dealing with the matter under the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 1986.32. section 5 of the 1986 act deals with the constitution of juvenile court. section 8 of the act deals with the procedure to be followed by a magistrate not empowered to ..... the appellants and the denial of benefit to them of the provisions of both the acts was not proper. technicalities were allowed to defeat the benefits of a socially oriented legislation like the bihar children act, 1982 and the juvenile justice act, 1986. if the high court had doubts about the correctness of their age as given by .....

Hari Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2333; RLW2009(2)SC1400; 2009(6)SCALE695; (2009)13SCC211; 2009(6)LC2643(SC)

..... date of the incident, the accused-appellant herein was above 16 years of age and was, therefore, not governed by the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the `1986 act').6. it is the said order of the high court which has been impugned in this appeal.7. appearing for the appellant, mr. sushil ..... relation to commission of offences had been under the consideration of the central government ever since india achieved independence. with such object in mind, parliament enacted the juvenile justice act, 1986, in order to achieve the constitutional goals contemplated in articles 15(3), 39(e) and (f), 45 and 47 of the constitution imposing on the ..... . having regard to the views expressed hereinabove, we are unable to sustain the impugned order of the high court in holding that the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 1986, would not be applicable to the appellant's case since he was allegedly 13 days above the age prescribed.40. in the instant case, the appellant .....

Shokat Ali Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1335; 1991(2)WLN398

..... that as per medical report, the age of the petitioner is between 14 to 15 years, as such, he is a child within the definition of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the act'), as such, the order of bail cannot be passed by any court constituted under the code of criminal procedure. in other words, the learned sessions judge was ..... the above argument, it is necessary to refer certain relevant provisions of the act.the juvenile justice act, 1986 has been enacted to provide for care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles and for the adjudication of certain matters relating to, and disposition, delinquent juveniles. it is not disputed before me that the said act has come into force.section 2 of the said .....

Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3801

..... behalf of the petitioner submitted that the juvenile justice act, 1986 has already been repealed by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, whereby and whereunder, it has specifically been provided under section 4 of the said act that if there will be a conflict in respect of juvenile, the board shall enquire into the matter ..... the additional chief judicial magistrate is competent to hold enquiry for determination of age.5. chapter ii of section 4(1) of the said act reads as under :-4. juvenile justice board :- (1) notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the state government may, by notification in ..... or revoked. i have already discussed above that there is also no notification made by the state government constituting juvenile justice board for determination of age as required under section 4 of act, 2000. therefore, there is no alternative except the court of the additional chief judicial magistrate who is already .....

State of Mizoram Vs. Rualhleithanga

Court : Guwahati

..... 1-8-2003, making provision, amongst other, for constitution of juvenile justice board. prior to framing of the said rules and prior to the enactment of act of 2000 the government of mizoram vide notification dated 15-10-1999 had constituted the juvenile court under the provision of juvenile justice act 1986.26. in view of the finding recorded by this court that ..... the accused was about 16 years of age at the time of commission of the offence, he is required to be tried under the provision of act of 2000 and as he has ..... rape of the victim.19. the next point which requires consideration of this court is whether accused respondent is entitled to the benefit of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, which came into force on 1-4-2001 upon having been notified in the gazette of india pursuant to the provision contained in .....

Anney Kamran Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 131(2006)DLT663; 2006(91)DRJ719

..... or otherwise', the learned additional sessions judge while dealing with an application for bail on behalf of the petitioner conducted an inquiry under section 32 of the juvenile justice act, 1986 and determined the age of the petitioner. it was the contention of the learned counsel that since on the basis of such inquiry held by the learned ..... case was that of sunil das (supra). the learned counsel appearing for the state in that case however argued that under section 7(3) of the juvenile justice act, 1986 the court of session could exercise the powers conferred on the board only when the proceedings of a case came before it in appeal or revision or in ..... sessions court is that a person before it is a juvenile and the juvenile is sent to the juvenile justice board, it would still be incumbent upon the juvenile justice board to hold an inquiry under section 32(1) of the juvenile justice act, 1986 (which is similar to section 49 of the said act). to my mind, the key lies in determining whether .....

Abuzar HossaIn Alias Gulam Hossain. Vs. State of West Bengal.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)10SCC489

..... agencies in the care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of such juveniles and with these objectives in mind, it enacted juvenile justice act, 1986 (for short, 1986 act).4. 1986 act was replaced by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (for short, 2000 act). 2000 act has been enacted to carry forward the constitutional philosophy engrafted in articles 15 ..... and the denial of benefit to them of the provisions of both the acts was not proper. technicalities were allowed to defeat the benefits of a socially-oriented legislation like the bihar children act, 1982 and the juvenile justice act, 1986. if the high court had doubts about the correctness of their age ..... 1974).10. in exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 68 of the 2000 act, the central government has framed the rules entitled the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules, 2007 (for short, 2007 rules). the relevant rule for the purposes of .....