Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: juvenile justice act 1986 repealed chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 1,966 results (0.136 seconds)

Aug 29 2016 (HC)

N. Gowthaman @ Babu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by i ...

Court : Chennai

..... a sessions judge. 32. the madras children act, 1920, was repealed after the parliament passed the juvenile justice act, 1986 (central act 53 of 1986), which was repealed by act 56 of 2000 and now, the central act 56 of 2000 has been repealed by the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015 (act 2 of 2016) with effect from 01.01 ..... .2016. 33. we have extracted the provisions of the juvenile justice act only to drive ..... , but, it only altered the age in section 10-a pursuant to the coming into force of the juvenile justice act, 1986. 72. the legislature did not choose to amend section 8 of the borstal schools act either in 1939 when section 10-a was introduced nor subsequently in 1989, when the age was changed, .....

Tag this Judgment!

1881

Smelting Company Vs. Kemp

Court : US Supreme Court

..... attending a patent, which we have stated, was declared, with the exceptions to it. upon the general doctrine, the court observed, speaking through mr. chief justice marshall, that the laws for the sale of the public lands provided many guards to secure the regularity of grants and to protect the incipient rights of individuals ..... operation that they have not to any great extent been interfered with by legislation, either state or national. in the first mining statute, passed july 9, 1986, they received the recognition and sanction of congress, as they had previously the legislative and judicial approval of the states and territories in which mines of gold ..... upon matters within their exclusive jurisdiction, unassailable except by a direct proceeding for its correction or annulment. the execution and record of the patent are the final acts of the officers of the government for the transfer of its title, and as they can be lawfully performed only after certain steps have been taken, that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1945 (PC)

K.B. Mohammad Maqsood Ali Khan Vs. B. Hoshiar Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1945All377

..... well-known case in kendall v. hamilton (1879) 4 a.c. 504is but the machinery of the law after all-the channel and means whereby law is administered and justice reached. it strangely departs from its proper office when in place of facilitating it is permitted to obstruct, and even extinguish legal rights, and is thus made to govern where ..... suit no. 95 of 1931. it was dismissed by the learned civil judge on 23rd december 1931 but was decreed by the high court on appeal, on 16th march 1986. on 16th september 1936 the amount due on this mortgage was rs. 27,823-11-4. a small amount of rs. 9 odd was awarded as costs and the ..... it struck off the application of 24th july 1936, which has been the real cause of mischief. the two capacities, in which the applications under the encumbered estates act and the agriculturists' relief act were made, were, as subsequent events and judicial pronouncements have established, different and the applicant was, under the mistaken view of the court, denied what was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1951 (HC)

State Vs. Kalu S/O Girdhari and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1952CriLJ887

..... statute and so the appellate court is entitled to dismiss the appeal summarily without hearing the accused, the prisoner having no right to insist on being heard. justice wassoodew agreed with this opinion and observed:the rule 'audi alteram partem' (hear the other side) cannot be extended without qualification to criminal appeals presented by ..... merits and the order passed by the sessions judge rejecting the appeal as time barred should be distinguished as a dismissal under section 4 of the limitation act (act 15 of 1877) and should not be taken to have been passed on merits and thus the previous order was open to review by the sessions judge ..... not think so. the right of appeal under section 417 remains untouched; it affects only the period of six months given by article 157 of the limitation act for filing government appeals, and demands from the executive government extra care and alertness in preferring appeals against acquittal before a summary appeal against the conviction is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1951 (HC)

Sri Lakshmindra theertha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt and anr. Vs. the C ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad613; (1952)IMLJ557

..... article 31(1). for a further discussion of the meaning of the word 'acquire' reference may be made to the decision of the learned chief justice and venkatarama iyer j. in the judgment relating to rent reduction act in 'ramakrishna ranga rao v. state of madras', c. m. p. nos. 894 and 895 of 1951.33. if article 19(1)( ..... to rescind the said notification. the second respondent in the petitions as originally filed was the hindu religious endowments board, madras. when the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act (act xix (19) of 1951), came into force on 30-9-51, the petitioners obtained leave to amend the petitions by substituting the commissioner, hindu religious and charitable endowments ..... they may not appear to be inclined'. this is one of the most deeply rooted ideas in all systems of justice. so essential is it to english legal notions that it has been suggested that not even an act of parliament could make a man judge in his own cause and that a statute would be void if it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1952 (HC)

Ranjit Singh and anr. Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1952HP81

..... if any, was also curable under section 537 of the code since, apart from raising the said technical objection, it is not suggested that any failure of justice had in fact been occasioned. i therefore hold that no oral or documentary evidence is in this case liable to be discarded as inadmissible on the ground of ..... cross-examination to baldeo singh, who proved the letter. i have therefore no doubt about its genuineness.the letter is also admissible under section 32 (1), evidence act, for the circumstances mentioned therein have a proximate relation to the transaction of strained relations between the husband and wife which later resulted in the death of the ..... the sections have not been complied, it shall take evidence that the accused person duly made the statement recorded, and, notwithstanding anything contained in section 91, evidence act, such statement shall be admitted if the error has not injured the accused as to his defence on the merits. that being so, the statement of shri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1953 (SC)

Sidheshwar Mukherjee Vs. Bhubneshwar Prasad NaraIn Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC487; 1954(2)BLJR65; (1953)IIMLJ789(SC); [1954]1SCR177

Mukherjea, J.1. This appeal is on behalf of the plaintiff and is directed against a judgment and decree of a Division Bench of the Patna High Court, dated the 8th of September, 1948, modifying those of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Motihari, passed in Partition Suit No. 108/6 of 1943/46. There were two money suits between the same parties which were tried along with the suit for partition and both of them were decreed by the trial judge, but dismissed by the High Court on appeal. Civil Appeals Nos. 54 and 55 of this court arise out of these appeals and we will deal with them separately. 2. So far as the main appeal is concerned, the material facts are uncontroverted and the dispute centers round one short point, which relates to the extent of share in the disputed properties to which the plaintiff can be said to have acquired a legal title. The plaintiff averred that he was entitled to a 4 annas share in the schedule lands and this claim was allowed by the trail judge. The High Cou...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1954 (HC)

Moti Bai Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1954CriLJ1591

..... for the purpose of preparing his defence, unless there are exceptional circumstances.to use the words of madgavkar j. in this case, if the end of justice is justice and the spirit of justice is fairness, then each side should have equal opportunity to prepare its own case, and to lay its evidence fully, freely and fairly, before the ..... when they are in custody from the time that they had been arrested and accused of an offence.6. reference may also be invited to b, 126, evidence act, which makes all communications between professional advisers like a barrister, attorney, pleader or vakil, and their clients confidential, and it is only when the clients express consent, ..... of advocates can only be upheld if they honourably bear in mind that they are officers of the court and do not lend themselves in any way to act as intermediaries to facilitate improper communications with other undetected criminal associates of the accused.the last case to which reference may be made is - kailash nath v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1954 (HC)

Abdul Rehman Khan Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1955CriLJ1021

ORDERNigam, J.C.1. In Case No. 389 of 1954 pending in the court of the City Magistrate, Ajmer, State v. Abdul Rahman Under Section 211, I.P.C., the learned Counsel for the accused on 21-12-1953 raised the point of sanction. 8-1-1954 was fixed for arguments. On that date, certain original applications were not available. Finally on 2-3-1954 the accused wanted to file an affidavit that he had lodged a certain complaint in the court of the Additional City Magistrate. Finally 12-6-1954 was fixed for arguments, but on that date the learned Counsel for the accused was required to lead evidence to show that the original representation is lost before ho could be allowed to produce secondary evidence.On 3-7-1954 the learned Counsel for the accused raised the question that these witnesses should be called Under Section 540, Criminal P. C. This the learned Honorary Magistrate declined to do and gave the accused the alternative of either having summons issued on depositing the necessary diet money...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1955 (SC)

State of Bombay Vs. Mulji Jetha and Co.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1955SC325

..... an officer who shall be 'the collector' and who may exercise, throughout his district, all the powers and discharge all the duties imposed on a collector by this act. the learned attorney-general could not contest this position. it is clear, therefore, that the state has not made out that there is any valid and legal condition ..... relevant portions of these three sections as they stood prior to their amendment in 1913 were as follows:'48. the land revenue liable under the provisions of this act shall be chargeable--(a) upon' land appropriated for purpose of agriculture;(b) upon land appropriated for any purpose from which any other profit or advantage than that ..... to sell them for buildings being constructed thereon in accordance with the municipal bye-laws, and that neither the defendant nor their officers are entitled to do any act prejudicial to the plaintiff's aforesaid rights.' appeal no. 10 arises out of the suit which relates to survey no. 2113 and the declaration asked for therein .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //