Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: juvenile justice act 1986 repealed chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 440 results (0.075 seconds)

Apr 30 2024 (HC)

Surya And Co Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the police officer to take such other steps consistent with law and with the orders of his superiors to bring the offenders to justice. section 65(g) of the act provides that police officer shall aid another police officer when called on by him or in the case of need in the discharge of his duty, in ..... 13.9. the functions of the judiciary and the police are complementary, not overlapping. 4613.10. save in exceptional cases where non-interference would result in miscarriage of justice, the court and the judicial process should not interfere at the stage of investigation of offences. 13.11. extraordinary and inherent powers of the court do not confer an ..... is not done, there are 59 all chances of the offender succeeding in escaping from the clutches of law, which could be detriment to the cause of the justice. if the court is satisfied that allegations made and materials collected prima facie make out an offence, the court should normally not interfere with the investigation into the offence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2024 (HC)

Veeresha S/o Siddappa Koravara Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... act. section 9 of the 2015 act is already reproduced in the earlier part of this judgment. according to sub-section ..... been conducted by a sessions court without the accused having claimed juvenility before it, conviction could be set aside as being vitiated in law if subsequently it is held that . the accused was a juvenile 33. the above judgments relate to an offence covered by either the juvenile justice act, 1986 ( the 1986 act ) or the 2000 act. we now proceed to briefly discuss the provisions under the 2015 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2024 (HC)

Dr. Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... (1) p , w(1)(2), 3 p (2) (v)(va) j . ./j .n. .j dp 1989. sec:75. of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2015 crai dg u . (emphasis added) after the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner files an application under section 226 of the cr.p.c., ..... p , w(1)(2), 3 p (2) (v)(va) j . ./j .n. .j dp 1989. sec:75. & 77 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2015 crai dg u . f z g u n ai p . a.12 g g 4 d v g t ai d au z au v ..... (v)(va) j . /j .n .j dp 1989. sec:3(f) & sec 7 of religious institution prevention of misuse act 1988 and sec:75. of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2015 1 d v g au v dau d au z g vz , 1991 jaz av z u u g z ja.p ..... (1996) 4 scc659and has laid down the following test for framing of charges: 30. in antulay case [r.s. nayak v. a.r. antulay, (1986) 2 scc716:1986. scc (cri) 256]. bhagwati, c.j., opined, after noting the difference in the language of the three pairs of sections, that despite the difference there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2024 (HC)

Dr.shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... (1) p , w(1)(2), 3 p (2) (v)(va) j . ./j .n. .j dp 1989. sec:75. of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2015 crai dg u . (emphasis added) after the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner files an application under section 226 of the cr.p.c., ..... p , w(1)(2), 3 p (2) (v)(va) j . ./j .n. .j dp 1989. sec:75. & 77 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2015 crai dg u . f z g u n ai p . a.12 g g 4 d v g t ai d au z au v ..... (v)(va) j . /j .n .j dp 1989. sec:3(f) & sec 7 of religious institution prevention of misuse act 1988 and sec:75. of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act 2015 1 d v g au v dau d au z g vz , 1991 jaz av z u u g z ja.p ..... (1996) 4 scc659and has laid down the following test for framing of charges: 30. in antulay case [r.s. nayak v. a.r. antulay, (1986) 2 scc716:1986. scc (cri) 256]. bhagwati, c.j., opined, after noting the difference in the language of the three pairs of sections, that despite the difference there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri Dabbagullappa

Court : Karnataka

..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt P N Niranjani

Court : Karnataka

..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri.p.s.krishna Murthy

Court : Karnataka

..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Shobhavathi T R

Court : Karnataka

..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri. M Manjunatha

Court : Karnataka

..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... nature of a subsequent event. therefore, there is no necessity to quash the acquisition which is otherwise valid and legal and thus it would meet the ends of justice. (emphasis supplied) 265 42. the acquisitions in the said case have been upheld subject to various directions which shall be discussed subsequently.43. having regard to the ..... to the original bench by the division bench will have to be sparingly used when the situation absolutely warrants such_a remand, as opined by my lord the chief justice. (emphasis supplied) 38. the hon ble supreme court in the case of roma sonkar vs. madhya pradesh state public service commission and others10 has held as follows ..... shri. jeevan j.neeralgi, aga for r2) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.11025/2010 dated1107/2014. in w.a. no.1986 of2014between:1. bangalore development authority by its commissioner kumara park west t. chowdaiah road bangalore-560 020.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //