Skip to content


Interruption - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interruption Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 134 results (0.013 seconds)
Mar 27 2002 (HC)

Lakhiram Narandas Bawasadhu Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-27-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ585

ravi r tripathi j 1 this appeal is filed under section 374 2 of the code of criminal procedure against...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2002 (HC)

Laxmana Reddy Vs. Police Inspector, Peenya Police Station, Bangalore a ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-11-2002

Reported in: 2002CriLJ1201; ILR2002KAR1455; 2002(5)KarLJ169

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 2002 (HC)

Nagappa Hanumanthappa Lamani Vs. Management of Sericulture Department, ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-26-2002

Reported in: [2002(94)FLR1183]; ILR2002KAR3573; 2002(4)KarLJ497

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2002 (HC)

Rajmani Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-16-2002

Reported in: 2002(4)AWC3206

..... 91 as demanded by rule 4 petitioner could not work during pendency of writ petition interruptions to be ignored petitioner s services from 21 01 93 to 28 03 01 also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2002 (SC)

State of Punjab Vs. Hardeep Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-10-2002

Reported in: JT2002(Suppl1)SC569

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place not satisfied with the judgment of the trial court the appellants .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 2002 (TRI)

N. Manilal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Dec-18-2002

Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ10CAT

..... a government servant under government shall be treated as automatically condoned and the pre interruption service treated as qualifying service unless specific indication contrary to this is made ..... earlier services in the naval stores depot and dandakaranya development authority and condoning the interruption of services for grant of pensionary benefits while similarly situated others were granted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 22 2002 (HC)

Krishnaveni Textile Mills, Singanallur, Coimbatore Vs. the Asst. Labou ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-22-2002

Reported in: [2002(95)FLR1164]; (2002)IIILLJ607Mad; (2002)3MLJ74

..... if he has for that period been in uninterrupted service including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness accident leave absence from duty without leave not being absence in ..... act makes it clear that continuous service means i uninterrupted service including services which is interrupted on account of sickness accident leave absence from duty without leave not being absence in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2002 (HC)

Kaleeswarar Mills a Unit, Coimbatore Vs. the Asst. Labour Commissioner ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-07-2002

Reported in: [2003(96)FLR662]

..... period been in uninterrupted service including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness accident leave absence from duty without ..... the absence during such strike would not be considered as interruption in service this is apparent from the following observation by ..... employee the period of absence would not be considered as interruption in service 7 in the present case neither the original .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2002 (TRI)

Alsthom Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Apr-23-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC287Tri(Kol.)kata

..... could occur during processing and after unloading from the vaccum furnaces and before handing over interrupter to testing the appellants also filed detailed statements of loading vis a vis actual ..... the appellants have contended that there is no evidence at all for clandestine removal of interrupters the appellants submitted before the commissioner that the tubes which are defective and found .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (HC)

R. Karithimma Naidu Vs. R. Venkatrama Gounder,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)1MLJ827

..... possession whether it was legal or otherwise prakasalingam did obtain possession and this was an interruption of the adverse possession by the respondents in respect of the present suit time under ..... the possession of the property in execution proceedings under ex a9 would amount to an interruption of the peaceful and continuous possession and enjoyment of the person who claims adverse possession .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //