Interruption - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interruption Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 105 results (0.012 seconds)Dr. Siddalinga Devaru and anr. Vs. Selection Committee, Kidwai Memoria ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-02-1997
Reported in: ILR1998KAR1556
p vishwanatha shetty j 1 the controversy raised in these petitions relates to the validity of the recruitment rules providing...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArun Moreshwar Patankar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-03-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALLMR562; 1997(4)BomCR473
v p tipnis j 1 we have heard this petition for a considerable length of time we have heard shri...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasavarajappa Appa Vs. Associated Business Corporation
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-02-1997
Reported in: 1997(2)KarLJ459
..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Ravichandra Vs. Debt Recovery Tribunal, Bangalore and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-1997
Reported in: ILR1998KAR1951; 1998(5)KarLJ162
..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Manikyaraja Ballal Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-10-1997
Reported in: ILR1998KAR992
..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Gajanan Y. Ma ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-1997
Reported in: AIR1997SC2774; 1997(2)BLJR1716; [1998]92CompCas335(SC); 1997(2)CTC175; JT1997(6)SC20; (1997)117PLR868; RLW1997(2)SC346; 1997(4)SCALE296; (1997)5SCC507; [1997]Supp1SCR80
..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place when the vehicle was being used with the same defects as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajeev Mankotia Vs. Secretary to the President of India and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-27-1997
Reported in: AIR1997SC2766; JT1997(5)SC663; 1997(4)SCALE368; (1997)10SCC441; [1997]3SCR421; 1997(2)LC362(SC)
..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place that was followed by grant of independence to the nation and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. Umesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-1997
Reported in: 1997IVAD(Delhi)741; 1998CriLJ604; 70(1997)DLT600; 1997(42)DRJ627; 1997RLR497
..... section 228 353 355 section 482 cr pc judicial barbarism remarks against judicial officer insult interruption of public servant holding judicial proceedings assault on public servant discharging of his duty dishonour .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Sadhna Devi and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-19-1997
Reported in: AIR1997SC1120; JT1997(3)SC255; 1997(2)SCALE189; (1997)3SCC90; [1997]2SCR186; 1997(1)LC458(SC); (1997)2UPLBEC981
..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoginder Singh Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-12-1997
Reported in: (1998)118PLR619
..... may be condoned subject to the following conditions namely 1 the interruption should have been caused by reasons beyond the control of ..... government employee concerned 2 service preceding the interruption should not be less than five years duration in cases ..... this discretion is not absolute and in a case where interruption in service has been caused by reasons beyond the control .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial