Interruption - Judgment Search Results

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railway and ors. Vs. Syed Gayaz Ch ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALT31

orders r nayak j 1 the union of india and its authorities who are the petitioners in this writ petition...

ito Vs. Jogendrasing Mohansingh (Huf) and

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Ahd.)148

these appeals filed by the revenue involving tour assessees relate to assessment years 1989 90 to 1991 92 since identical...

income Tax Officer Vs. Jogendrasing Mohansingh (Huf)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

1 these appeals filed by the revenue involving four assessees relate to asst yrs 1989 90 to 1991 92 since...

Tek Chand and ors. Vs. Deep Chand and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1392; RLW2001(2)SC302; 2001(2)SCALE204; (2001)4SCC488; 2001(1)LC579(SC)

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

Krishtappa Vs. Ananta Kalappa Jaratakhane and Another

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2001Kant322; ILR2001KAR5239

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Nagaraj and Another Vs. Ammayamma

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: I(2002)DMC439; ILR2001KAR4004; 2001(5)KarLJ516

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

N.S.S. Narayana Sarma and ors. Vs. Goldstone Exports (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC251; 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)634; 2002(1)ALT17(SC); [2002(1)JCR207(SC)]; JT2001(10)SC13; (2002)3PLR552; 2001(8)SCALE269; (2002)1SCC662

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place the appellants approached the high court in appeal but were unsuccessful .....

Mohd. Ishaq and Others Vs. D.D.A. and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002(61)DRJ699

..... acquisition act 1894 section 4 notification issued wayback in 1959 plea of continuous and un interrupted possession of land for decades taken in writ petition petitioner didn t challenge the notification .....

Daya Singh Lahoria Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1716; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)828; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2001CriLJ2188; JT2001(5)SC31; 2001(3)SCALE370; (2001)4SCC516; [2001]3SCR1; 2001(2)LC1002(SC)

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

Kayathi Jayapal Reddy Vs. State Election Commission and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(6)ALD136; 2001(5)ALT587

..... the declaration of the results the direction sought for by the petitioner is not for interrupting obstructing or protracting the election proceedings in any manner nor the petitioner challenges the ..... observed in preceding paragraphs elsewhere the petitioner is not seeking any relief to stall or interrupt or protract the election proceedings the dispute raised by the petitioner in my considered .....