Interruption - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interruption Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 88 results (0.011 seconds)V. Gopalakrishnaiah Vs. District Co-operative Central Bank, Kakinada, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-1998
Reported in: 1998(6)ALD137; 1998(5)ALT668
ordern y hanumanthappa j 1 all these writ petitions have been filed by the employees working in the district co...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Janakiraman Vs. N. Uma Devi and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)1MLJ276
orders s subramani j 1 landlord in r c o p no 1530 of 1986 on the file of 14th...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Mrs. Krishna Srivastava and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-20-1998
Reported in: (1998)2UPLBEC1280
d k seth j 1 these group of writ petitions have been heard together by the consent of parties since...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanwari Lal Agarwalla Vs. Ram Swaroop Agarwalla
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-19-1998
m y eqbal j 1 since the fate of these two cases depends upon the adjudication of mainissue whether the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJindal Polymers Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-1998
Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC254
1 the above appeal arises out of the order of the additional commissioner of central excise denying modvat credit of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Kalegouda Vs. K. Sadashivappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-16-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD(Cri)459; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)86; [1998]93CompCas423(Kar); 1998CriLJ3539; ILR1998KAR2143; 1998(4)KarLJ526
..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijaya Kumar Shrotriya Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-13-1998
Reported in: JT1998(1)SC692; (1998)IIIMLJ22(SC); 1998(1)SCALE598; (1998)3SCC397; [1998]1SCR883; (1998)1UPLBEC700
..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.S. Angadi Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-08-1998
Reported in: [1999(82)FLR964]; 1999(4)KarLJ193
..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India and anr. Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-03-1998
Reported in: 1998(6)SCALE287b
..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmit Gems Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-09-1998
Reported in: 1998(6)SCALE287
..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial