Skip to content


Interruption - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interruption Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 53 results (0.012 seconds)
Aug 04 1986 (HC)

Sri Siddalingeshwara Adike Stores Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-04-1986

Reported in: ILR1986KAR4073

orderrama jois j 1 in these writ petitions presented by the petitioners who are traders as also commission agents licenced...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1986 (HC)

R.S.E.B., Vidyut Bhawan Vs. the Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd., New Delh ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-18-1986

Reported in: 1988(1)WLN191

order against tn 3010 for supply of acsr panther conductor depute your fully authorised representative for discussion on december 29...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1986 (HC)

Channabasappa Vs. Nanjundappa

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-01-1986

Reported in: ILR1986KAR3536

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1986 (SC)

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. D.K. Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-26-1986

Reported in: AIR1987SC190; 1986(2)SCALE304; (1986)4SCC160; 1986(2)LC565(SC)

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 1986 (HC)

Malleswaram Co-operative Society Vs. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-07-1986

Reported in: ILR1986KAR2329

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 1986 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Orissa Vs. Orissa Corporation P. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-19-1986

Reported in: AIR1986SC1849; (1986)52CTR(SC)138

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 1986 (HC)

Abdul Rajak Haji Mohammed Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-11-1986

Reported in: 1986CriLJ2018

..... evidence such a person could also be prosecuted if he insulted the investigating officer or interrupted the proceedings further consequences were that any incriminating statement made by him before the ..... it would mean that the interrogation and investigation would be riddled with objections and interruptions right or wrong and that would render the entire proceedings a farce this certainly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 1986 (HC)

Abdul Rajak Haji Mohammed Vs. Union of India and Another

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-11-1986

Reported in: [1989]65CompCas78(Bom); 1986(10)ECC237; 1989(23)LC268(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT305(Bom)

..... evidence such a person could also be prosecuted if he insulted the investigating officer or interrupted the proceedings further consequences were that any incriminating statement made by him before the ..... it would mean that the interrogation and investigation would be riddled with objections and interruptions right or wrong and that would render the entire proceedings a farce this certainly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 1986 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Madras and Etc. Vs. A.D. Jeyaveerapandia ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-18-1986

Reported in: AIR1989Mad39

..... that it is not the case of the insurance company that an interruption in transit would absolve them of liability under the terms of ..... that would suffice to establish that transit had commenced though it was interrupted later owing to rough seas and storm but that would not ..... especially when there is no clause to the effect that an interruption in transit would put an end to the liability of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 1986 (HC)

National Insurance Company Ltd. and ors. Vs. A.D. Jeyaveera Pandia Nad ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-18-1986

Reported in: I(1990)ACC341

..... it is not the case of the insurance company that an interruption in transit would absolve them of liability under the terms of ..... that would suffice to establish that transit had commenced though it was interrupted later owing to rough seas and storm but that would not ..... policies especially when there is not clause to the effect that an interruption in transit would put an end to the liability of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //