Increment Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increment value Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 20,569 results (0.085 seconds)All India BSNL Pensioner's Welfare Association, represented by Its Cir ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Mar-15-2012
reason of his position in a cadre as the extra increment other than stagnation increment granted to a person who is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.M.Chandnani Vs. Branch Manager, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
directing the respondents to grant the benefits of 4th stagnation increment in terms of clause 5 of the 7th bipartite settlement admitted in the instant petition that 5th stagnation increment was added in the 7th bipartite settlement on 01 11 1997 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuchibhotla Samba Siva Sastri S/O Muralidhara Sastri Manager, A.P. Co- ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
strictly entitled for only one additional increment but not two increments with effect from 01 06 1984 becomes a plausible one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuchibhotla Samba Siva Sastri S/O Murali Vs. Managing Director Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
of the respondent bank to receive one or two additional increments as the case may be depending upon the number of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Sarja Neelkhanth Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
90 170 7 it has been decided regarding three advance increments to ladies on first appointment and two advance increments on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs.Akta Gulati and Others Vs. National Capital Territory of Delhi and ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
employees at par with regular employees applicants relying upon the increments given to the employees of one of the institutions run
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Serji, Lecturer (Selection Grade), Department of Chemistry, S.N. C ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-14-2012
acquisition going by sub clause a four and two advance increments will be admissible to those who hold ph d and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVirender Parshad and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
increments in issue were to be adjusted against future annual increments of the eligible judicial officers such like misconstruction given to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCase of State of Punjab Versus Ishar Singh (2002) 10 Scc Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
p 7 vide which the earlier granted benefit of additional increment by counting adhoc service on completion of 8 years of cwp no 2653 of 2011 9 it needs to be added here that the petitioners have not pleaded that their appointment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.G. Divakaran Nair Vs. the Chief Engineer (Civil) and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Apr-10-2012
31 12 2010 when he had been paid the second increment increasing the pay to rs 43 490 instead of rs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial