Increment Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increment value Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 16,957 results (0.075 seconds)Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Guj124
..... between the second and third is the increment of the value of the reconstituted plots that remain with ..... union of india is exempted from liability of incremental contribution demanded by the plaintiff in this behalf ..... the owner on the completion of the scheme and only 50 per cent of the increment can be recovered from the owner as his increment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBal Krishan Sareen Vs. P.O., Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-26-2003
Reported in: (2004)ILLJ1133P& H
1987 holding that he was not entitled to any deemed increments and other deemed benefits in the absence of any specific
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Parkash and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: (2003)135PLR276
pay of the next higher post in such circumstances the increments have to be given to step up the pay on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.C. Banawala Vs. District Judge and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)3GLR1866
shall become payable to him from the date on future increments shall accrue to him as if no increments had been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. H.S. Srinivas Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Apr-16-2003
Reported in: (2004)(1)SLJ368CAT
increment in the revised scale of pay for every 3 increments in the existing scale of pay was illogical and there
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-27-2003
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR623(Jhr)]
unproved charges levelled against the petitioner imposition of three future increments would have been proper and reasonable 8 although the matter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagat Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Feb-24-2003
Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ353CAT
employee has been made entitled to second proficiency step up increment on completion of 16 years of service provided his over
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnail Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-14-2003
Reported in: (2003)IILLJ709P& H; (2003)133PLR483
again 7 increments during 9 87 on account of retrenchee increment benefit for which he was actually not entitled on 28 characteristic and trapping of finality and may adversely affect a valuable right of a party or decide an important aspect of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNandakumar Vs. Chief Conservator of Forests
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-10-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)KLT1155; (2004)IILLJ109Ker
by that note it is made clear that withholding of increments even on a permanent basis would fall within the category and the relevant rules of the kerala government the note added by g o ms 70 p d as amended by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaidhyanath Prasad Singh Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-28-2003
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR144(Jhr)]
said regulation 8 is very clear that the stoppage of increment shall not be with cumulative effect and no arrears of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial