Increment Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increment value Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 12,808 results (0.093 seconds)E. Ebenezer Rajakumar (Former Group Director, Computer and Information ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Nov-09-2011
year as on 01 01 2006 because the granting of increment on 01 01 2006 in the he pre revised pay
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.D. Khosla Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2011
..... accountant general aande tamil nadu chennai has granted benefits of increments under the 3rd and 4th proviso to similarly circumstances accounts ..... was that the applicants therein were entitled to the additional increment for pension purpose this order of the hyderabad bench of ..... the tribunal and therefore it does not constitute any precedential value however he has not been able to show that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.K. Sarojini, Kannur Dist Vs. State of Kerala Rep. by Principal Secre ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
time spent on leave that will not count for normal increment will not be reckoned prior service of government employees in maximum of 4 increments in the revised scale will be added to the pay so fixed the note reads as follows
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.G Suresh and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by Its Secretary ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Nov-30-2011
an opportunity of being heard they are entitled to get increment every year the regularisation will not postpone their increment date
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSipra Bhattacharya (Lahiri) Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata Appellate
Decided on: Mar-07-2011
the decision of the respondent authorities for stopping the early increment is not tenable and or justified in view of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSenthil Kumar M and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secre ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Oct-28-2011
with grade pay of rs 4200 after being paid annual increment as on 01 07 2007 the basic pay of the grade pay protected on appointment to the lower post of tax assistant stenographer grade iii 4 to direct the respondents to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNek Raj Bhatt Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
illegal and the respondents may be directed to release sterilization increment to the petitioner from 7 6 2000 to may 2000
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavindra Kumar Sood and anr. Vs. Ntpc and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-2011
the punishment given to the petitioner was withholding of one increment without cumulative effect from 01 10 1988 97 by another
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheo Shankar Singh Vs the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-29-2011
period during which there was no punishment order and the increment has already been allowed to the petitioner those increments could
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagi Rath Vs. H.R.T.C. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2011
e f 1 1 1986 7 the proficiency step up increments on completion of 8 years 18 years and 24 years
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial