Increment Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increment value Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 8,567 results (0.063 seconds)Coal Mines Officers Association of India and Others Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-21-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Cal28,100CWN197
statements of witnesses and other material it has no evidentiary value in the trial of the criminal case the courts below
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBramchari Sidheswar Shai and Others Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-02-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC2089; JT1995(5)SC205; 1996(7)KarLJ752; 1995(4)SCALE113; (1995)4SCC646; [1995]Supp1SCR745
in different sects and in different sections of gods there added with the result that today the hindu pantheon presents the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.N. Ghiya Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Feb-28-1995
Reported in: (1995)54ITD269(JP.)
132 4a and hence to permissible at law the evidentiary value of the incriminating evidence found and seized in the course
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGtc Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-28-1995
Reported in: (1998)60TTJ(Mumbai)308
the value quoted in these quotations was not the proper value and in case the department is compelled to give the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGtc Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-28-1995
Reported in: (1998)65ITD380(Mum.)
keep on growing and developing with changing social concepts and values otherwise there will be estrangement between law and justice and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Ajay Ajit Peter Kerkar
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-04-1995
Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT299Tri(Mum.)bai
the impugned order he held two sony betacam sp recorder valued at rs 11 13 125 as liable to confiscation under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlim Ahuja Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-26-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ1920; 1996WLC(Raj)UC522
l sharma p w 4 even taken on its face value does not implicate the petitioner with the commission of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Rajasthan Vs. Satya NaraIn and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-20-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ2146
this witness is taken to be true on its face value still then the presence of the accused persons near the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Bhat Vs. Srimathi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-24-1995
Reported in: II(1995)DMC280; ILR1995KAR1494; 1995(2)KarLJ271
286 is as follows e c t is often of value in alleviating depressive symptoms and in disrupting acute hallucinatory states
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTResham Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-1995
Reported in: 1995CriLJ3325
b r arora j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1 2 1989 passed by the additional...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial