Increment Value - Judgment Search Results

Shri MA. Rasheed Jameel S/O M.A.G. Vs. the General Manager, South

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

existing scale shown in the schedule the provision of fitment increment as well as other provisions are applicable if the pay cent of the basic in the existing scale shall be added to the existing emoluments of the employee ii after the

A. Gopalakrishna Murthy S/O. A. Vs. the Divisional Railway Manager,

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

23 09 2003 however the earlier punishment of withholding of increment for a period of six months was set aside by

E. Prasad Vs. the Senior Divisional Mehanical

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

acquiring higher qualification and he has been given only 4 increments the relevant facts in brief are as follows 3 the

ishwar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)(3)SLJ299CAT

not unusual for the recruiting bodies to recommend certain advance increments in the given pay scale in respect of a particular

Kishori Lal Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

wages for the period of absence the right to receive increments was directly associated with the right to wages in the

Shrinivas Govind Samant and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(6)BomCR766

r dated 11 11 1983 the benefit of two advance increments given to the petitioners were withdrawn by the department as

Gmr Energy Ltd. and Shri Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)(122)ECC355

..... the present case vi under the ltapsa the invoices were to show only the incremental value over the value of returned parts to limit the customs duty liability vii moreover they mis stated ..... of the commissioner that the prices declared by ge in their invoices represent only the incremental value is factually incorrect inasmuch as ge has published a list price for the customers operating .....

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2007)2CALLT177(HC)

only to the extent as to whether the denial of increment to the respondent no 3 at the rate of rs

Dr. P. Arumugham Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, by Its Secretary, Health ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)1MLJ917

effect with effect from 8 9 1988 iv stoppage of increment for a period of two years without cumulative effect with enthuses the workmen to render efficient service which is a valuable asset for greater productivity to the employer and national production

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Tej Pal

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(94)DRJ16

for not issuing next three ticket on 11 7 88 increments 11 ipd ait cs 137 suspended w e f 1