Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

In Law - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2014

Law Vs. Siegel

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-04-2014

Law v. Siegel NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in


1989

Laws Vs. Armontrout

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1989

LAWS v. ARMONTROUT - 490 U.S. 1040 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court LAWS v. ARMONTROUT , 490 U.S. 1040 (1989)


Jan 05 1925

Law Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-05-1925

Law v. United States - 266 U.S. 494 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494


18-section briefs on any result in this list

1930

Laws Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1930

LAWS v. DAVIS - 281 U.S. 702 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930) 281


1880

Hall Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1880

Hall v. Law - 102 U.S. 461 (1880) U.S. Supreme Court Hall v. Law, 102 U.S. 461 (1880) Hall v. Law


1857

Snow Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1857

Snow v. Law - 61 U.S. 543 (1857) U.S. Supreme Court Snow v. Law, 61 U.S. 20 How. 543 543 (1857)


1858

Rogers Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1858

Rogers v. Law - 62 U.S. 526 (1858) U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. Law, 62 U.S. 21 How. 526 526 (1858)


1861

Rogers Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1861

Rogers v. Law - 66 U.S. 253 (1861) U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. Law, 66 U.S. 1 Black 253 253 (1861)


1861

Law Vs. Cross

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1861

been brought in the name of Cross, Hobson & company, instead of Alexander Cross has no support either in law or the facts in evidence. The contract on which the suit was brought was with Cross alone. Law … had made some contract with it which does not otherwise appear is certainly not a necessary one either in law or in fact. Every letter of instruction as to purchase of coal was sent by Law to Cross


1853

Adams Vs. Law

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1853

57 U. S. 148 declared to be "subject to the same rules, regulations, and restrictions as are prescribed in law in case of writs of error." Under this provision, an appeal in chancery must be perfected by giving


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial