Impugn - Judgment Search Results
The Impugned Order Dated 9.4.2010 (Annexure P-2) Is Set Vs. State of H ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-10-2013
of Parbhakar will not render the candidate ineligible. On the face of it the reasoning adopted in the impugned order dated 9.4.2010 (Annexure P-2) is in clear conflict of the judgement passed by this Court in Satbir
i) the Impugned Fir No.28/2010 Dt.29/1/2010 (Annexure P3) Is Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
and his wife Rubeena (petitioner No.2), sister of the complainant, have preferred the present petition for quashing the impugned FIR (Annexure P3) and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, invoking the provisions of Section 482 Cr.PC, inter-alia
Also the Impugned Interim Order Dated 23.07.2013 Passed in Vs. Nirmola ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
Mohinder 2013.08.14 15:48 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.16178 of 2013 [2].also the impugned interim order dated 23.07.2013 passed in OA No.1033/PB/2013. We wish to impress upon the Tribunal to maintain consistency
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Petitioners Impugn the Notifications Dated Vs. Gyasi Ram and Other ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
Mohinder 2014.01.30 12:10 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.506 of 2014 [2].The petitioners impugn the notifications dated 11.02.2011 (Annexure P-5) and 10.02.2012 (Annexure P-9) issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the
The Petitioner Impugns the Acquisition of His Land Vs. Surinder Kumar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
Mohinder 2014.03.07 11:58 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.3433 of 2014 [2].The petitioner impugns the acquisition of his land comprised in KhaSr.No.19//23/1 (1-11).situated within the revenue estate of village Kadipur, Tehsil and
Challenging the Impugned Award the Appellants Have Took Vs. Smt. Malda ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh RFA No.1219 of 1997 -2- the reference Court vide the impugned Award and compensation at the following rates had been awarded:- Amount per acre Kind of land `54,038/- Chahi
The Petitioner Impugns the Notifications Dated Vs. Krishna Devi .....P ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-16-2014
Mohinder 2014.07.31 12:33 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.13541 of 2014 [2].The petitioner impugns the notifications dated 18.12.2008 (Annexure P-1) and 17.12.2009 (Annexure P-2) issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the
Byju V Sebastian (Wrongly Shown as Baiju V.Sebastian in Impugned Order ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-14-2023
OF ATROCITIES AGAINST SC/ST (SPECIAL COURT), PATHANAMTHITTA APPELLANT/PETITIONER/ACCUSED A1: BYJU V SEBASTIAN (WRONGLY SHOWN AS BAIJU V.SEBASTIAN IN IMPUGNED ORDER) S/O. V.T.THOMAS, VELLAMPLAMMURIYIL VEEDU, VATTAKKAYAM KARA,PAZHAVANGADI VILLAGE, RANNY TALUK, PIN - 689672 BY ADVS. M.R.NANDAKUMAR BENNY ANTONY
“The Learned Single Judge in the Impugned Judgment Has Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2013
these appeals came up for hearing, this Court passed the following order:- “The learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment has taken note of the departmental inquiry which was held against the appellant and resulted into imposition
The Petitioner While Impugning the Notifications Vs. Nihal Singh ..... ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
2013.07.24 12:05 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.4380 of 2013 [2].5].The petitioner while impugning the notifications dated 29.11.2006 (Annexure P-3) and 28.11.2007 (Annexure P5) issued under Sections 4 & 6, respectively, of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free