The Petitioner Impugns the Notifications Dated Vs. Krishna Devi .....Petitioner

The Petitioner Impugns the Notifications Dated vs Krishna Devi .....Petitioner

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jul 16, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1158755

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1158755
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Jul 16, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Petitioner Impugns the Notifications Dated

Respondent

Krishna Devi .....Petitioner

Excerpt

.....state counsel during the cours.of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non- prosecution. in view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, there is no need to seek counter-reply from respondent nos.1 & 3 nor respondent no.2 is required to be served at this stage. kumar mohinder 2014.07.31 12:33 i attest to the accuracy of this order chandigarh cwp no.13541 of 2014 [2].the petitioner impugns the notifications dated 18.12.2008 (annexure p-1) and 17.12.2009 (annexure p-2) issued under sections 4 & 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894, respectively, to the extent of acquisition of her land and residential house for the public purpose of development of residential sectors 9 part & 10 part, at dadri, district bhiwani. during the cours.of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that similar controvers.has been elaborately dealt with by this court vide order dated 20.08.2013 passed in a bunch of writ petitions including cwp no.23386 of 2011 (kuldeep singh versus state of haryana and another).we thus dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents that let the claim of the petitioners be also considered in the light of above-cited order ppassed in kuldeep singh's case (supra).let an appropriate decision be taken within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. till then, both the parties are directed to maintain status-quo. dasti. [surya kant].judge july 16, 2014 [lisa gill].mohinder judge kumar mohinder 2014.07.31 12:33 i attest to the accuracy of this order chandigarh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13541 of 2014 Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 Krishna Devi .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL.

Present : Mr.Ajay Vijarania, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms.Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.

-.- 1.

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?.

--- Surya Kant, J.

(Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 & 3 only at this stage.

On our asking, Ms.Palika Monga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf.

Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State Counsel during the couRs.of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non- prosecution.

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, there is no need to seek counter-reply from respondent Nos.1 & 3 nor respondent No.2 is required to be served at this stage.

Kumar Mohinder 2014.07.31 12:33 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.13541 of 2014 [2].The petitioner impugns the notifications dated 18.12.2008 (Annexure P-1) and 17.12.2009 (Annexure P-2) issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, respectively, to the extent of acquisition of her land and residential house for the public purpose of development of residential Sectors 9 Part & 10 Part, at Dadri, District Bhiwani.

During the couRs.of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that similar controveRs.has been elaborately dealt with by this Court vide order dated 20.08.2013 passed in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.23386 of 2011 (Kuldeep Singh versus State of Haryana and another).We thus dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents that let the claim of the petitioners be also considered in the light of above-cited order ppassed in Kuldeep Singh's case (supra).Let an appropriate decision be taken within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

Till then, both the parties are directed to maintain status-quo.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT].JUDGE July 16, 2014 [LISA GILL].Mohinder JUDGE Kumar Mohinder 2014.07.31 12:33 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties The Petitioner Impugns the Notifications Dated vs Krishna Dev... Same Subject Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition Residential house Advocate General Notice of motion To the extent of maintain status Certified copy dispose of