Skip to content


Improperly - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: improperly Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 865 results (0.017 seconds)
Jan 11 2012 (FN)

Perry Vs. New Hampshire

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-11-2012

s at 112 alerted to the prospect that identification evidence improperly obtained may be excluded the court reasoned police officers will

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2012 (HC)

Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and ors

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-01-2012

therefore elections should be directed as the returning officer had improperly and illegally rejected the nomination paper of the petitioner 50

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2012 (HC)

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-01-2012

important question will be whether the nomination paper has been improperly rejected in the sense non acceptance or non receipt of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2012 (HC)

Prahladan Vs. Varkala Kahar

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-21-2012

..... in which the respondent was declared elected is void ab initio according to the petitioner improper rejection of the nomination papers of the petitioner has adversely and materially affected the result ..... petitioner to contest the election from no 127 of the varkala legislative assembly constituency been improperly rejected 3 is the election of the respondent as the returned candidate from no 127 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2012 (HC)

P.Chidambaram Vs. R.S.Raja Kannappan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-07-2012

..... favour of the first respondent thereby making the first respondent to improperly receive votes so as to materially affect the election of ..... affected the result in favour of the first respondent by improper reception of votes and thus his election is liable to ..... petition the dismissal of the election petition at the threshold is improper and the election petitioner should have been directed to supply .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2012 (FN)

The General Council of the Bar of South Africa and Another Vs. Brenton ...

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

Decided on: Nov-29-2012

..... to charge full trial fees for the additional briefs they had improperly taken and likened this to daylight robbery its conclusion apparent from ..... number of counts of double briefing the limited amount of their improper gains and the relatively few occasions 12 20 and 27 ..... in double briefing and over reaching and the extent of their improper gains from this practice if one does that their circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2012 (HC)

Venkat Ram Reddy Reddygari and Another Vs. Arikala Narsa Reddy and Oth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-20-2012

Reported in: 2012(5)ALT499

..... the particulars of three votes which according to him were improperly rejected by the returning officer and having found that the ..... the election of the returned candidate has been materially affected by improper refusal or rejection of three 3 votes polled in favour ..... for the purpose of marking according to me this was improperly rejected by the returning officer saying that it looks like .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2012 (TRI)

Dr.C.Balasubramaniam and Another Vs. Subramani and Others

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Apr-20-2012

the 1st respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the district forum against the opposite parties praying for the direction...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 2012 (SC)

Markio Tado Vs. Takam Sorang and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-02-2012

h l gokhale j 1 leave granted 2 this appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14 9...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 19 2012 (HC)

N. Debora Indira Jaba Priya and Another Vs. Ibrahim Sha and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-19-2012

..... was given by the mortgagees defendants 3 and 4 or power was improperly or irregularly exercised by the defendant 3 and 4 while bringing the ..... no case was made out to authorise the sale or power was improperly or irregularly exercised 22 the scope of section 69 3 of the ..... is by way of damages against the mortgage who brought the property improperly to sale if there was fraud then there may be a cause .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //