Improperly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: improperly Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 592 results (0.016 seconds)Ramesh Kumar Rana Vs. Romesh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-1999
Reported in: (1999)122PLR205
..... counting of votes iii a large number of votes were improperly accepted in favour of respondent no 1 materially affecting the ..... the objections raised by the parties in relation to the improper acceptance or rejection of the voting papers but in exercising ..... ballot boxes and consider his objections about the improver acceptance or improper rejection of votes tendered by voters at any given election .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRoberts Vs. Galen of VA., Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-1999
roberts v galen of va inc 525 u s 249 1999 october term 1998 syllabus roberts guardian for johnson v...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-19-1999
Reported in: [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)
..... allegations were made against the plaintiffs with respect to the alleged improper invoicing on their part as the distributors of herbertsons and therefore ..... which they have obtained from the company and there was nothing improper in that in fact it was the defendants who were ..... of the sebi and which were illegally and in any case improperly procured mr nariman submitted that even if the plaintiffs are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Vimla Devi Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-24-1999
Reported in: AIR1999HP38
..... the result of the elected person was materially affected by improper reception of vote the petitioner or her election agent or ..... parties whether certain ballot paper of shri basakhu ram was improperly received and the vote was cast in favour of returned ..... the order of the authorised officer concluding that there had been improper reception of proxy vote in favour of returned candidate respondent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Lal Jassi Vs. Chaudhary Jagjit Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-12-1999
Reported in: (1999)123PLR179
rejection of votes it is alleged that the votes have improperly been counted in favour of returned candidate and improperly been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeder Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1999
..... guilt or innocence omitting an element can easily be analogized to improperly instructing the jury on the element an error that is ..... every element of the offense establishes no more than that an improper instruction on an element of the offense violates the sixth ..... where the defendant admitted the element on which the jury was improperly instructed and 3 where other facts necessarily found by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.L.J. Plastics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Nov-12-1999
Reported in: (2000)LC124Tri(Chennai)
..... 6 1998 therefore the goods already having been deemed to be improperly removed such a request was not maintainable and had been ..... bonded period the goods have to be treated as having been improperly removed from the bonded warehouse and that the rate of ..... the importer once the goods have been deemed to be already improperly removed the customs authorities correctly denied any further request for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-15-1999
Reported in: 2000(2)BomCR293
orderb n srikrishna j 1 these two petitions are in the nature of public interest litigation the first at the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSivanraj Vs. Essakkimuthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-24-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)CTC215
order1 both these revisions arise under tamil nadu buildings lease and rent control act act 18 of 1960 as amended...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMitra A.B. Vs. P.O., Iii Industrial Tribunal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-11-1999
Reported in: (1999)IILLJ1243Cal
..... by the tribunal cannot be said to be either arbitrary or improper or unfair 39 when under section 10 of the industrial ..... such procedure followed by the tribunal certainly will be unfair improper and arbitrary and therefore certainly can be interfered with by ..... such question as a preliminary point and the tribunal have acted improperly by directing the workman to adduce evidence first the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial