Improperly - Judgment Search Results

Rajan Ghoshal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2003(88)ECC140

..... ingredients for establishing existence of reason to believe once an attempt is made for exportation improperly and such attempt succeeds on being cleared by the proper officer and the actual exportation ..... goods are liable to confiscation as already held that these goods were attempted to be improperly exported with the wrong description given by the exporter therefore even though actual exportation .....

Vinod Pandurang Bharsakade Vs. Returning Officer and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(4)MhLj359

c k thakker c j 1 a common question of law has been raised inall the petitions to appreciate the...

M.V. Rajashekaran and ors. Vs. Vatal Nagaraj and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC742; JT2002(1)SC237; 2002(1)SCALE309; (2002)2SCC704; [2002]1SCR412; 2002(2)SCT423(SC); 2002(1)UJ464(SC)

..... said nagaraj therefore filed the election petition alleging inter alia that his nomination has been improperly rejected within the ambit of section 100 1 c of the representation of the ..... any disqualification under article 191 of the constitution and consequently rejection of his nomination was improper the high court ultimately having allowed the election petition and declaring the election of the .....

P. Viswanathan Vs. Dr. A.K. Burman and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2003CriLJ949

kalayan jyoti sengupta j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned single judge of...

Anil Jindal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 100(2002)DLT398

..... which deals with the confiscation of goods attempted to be improperly exported the said section 113 of the customs act 1962 ..... reads as follows 113 confiscation of goods attempted to be improperly exported etc the following export goods shall be liable to ..... cannot be said that the petitioner exported or attempted to export improperly the goods which were liable to be confiscated or prohibited .....

Backbone Tarmat-ng Jv Vs. National Highways Authority of India and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 99(2002)DLT862

..... the first respondent without disclosing their source it further opined that the said documents were improperly and illegally obtained with the help of some unscrupulous employees of the first respondent ..... become inadmissible in each and every circumstance in a civil suit or proceedings also if improperly or illegally procured evidence is found relevant it could be taken into consideration for .....

Modern Terry Towels Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2003Guj63; (2003)4GLR354

..... for interference with means or licensee s works and for improper use of energy read as under 39 theft of energy ..... such meter indicator or apparatus from duly registering or d improperly uses the energy of licensee shall be punishable with imprisonment ..... contrary is proved that such connection reconnection communication alteration prevention or improper use as the case may be has been knowingly and .....

Swaran Dhawan Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002CriLJ4763; 99(2002)DLT416

..... any such meter indicator or apparatus from duly registering or d improperly uses the energy of a licensee shall be punishable with ..... contrary is proved that such connection reconnection communication alteration prevention or improper use as the case may be has been knowingly and ..... or the electrical works of the licensee i e dvb or improper use of the energy the section prohibits punishment for the .....

Narad Paswan Vs. Ranjan Tewary @ Ranjan

Court: Patna

..... in the state of bihar but quite illegally the returning officer ignored the objection and improperly and illegally accepted his nomination according to the petitioner the sole respondent under the law ..... any constituency in the state of bihar did not arise according to the petitioner the improper acceptance of candidate of respondent has materially affected the result of election in question and .....

Bpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... senior counsel submitted that the charge of market manipulation implies an improper motive or intention that when such a charge is levelled ..... by digital who admits to engaging in a variety of improper activities and then claiming that he was merely a scapegoat ..... passes the test of reasonableness the possibility of powers conferred being improperly used is no ground for pronouncing it as invalid and .....