Improperly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: improperly Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 647 results (0.016 seconds)Dr. T. Dasaradha Rama Reddy Vs. P. Ramesh Babu and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-2009
not mentioned anywhere that first operation was conducted negligently or improperly that necessitated second operation at nims the complainant assumes by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHorne Vs. Flores
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-2009
..... by requiring petitioners to demonstrate appropriate action through a particular funding mechanism it improperly substituted its own policy judgments for those of the state and local officials entrusted ..... to demonstrate appropriate action through a particular funding mechanism the court of appeals improperly substituted its own educational and budgetary policy judgments for those of the state and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmi Kant Bajpai Vs. Hazi Yaqoob and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-08-2009
Reported in: JT2009(15)SC315; 2009(14)SCALE447; 2010(1)LC149(SC)
..... it concerns the returned candidate has been materially affected by improper reception of votes and by non compliance of the ..... presiding officer for the polling station at village turveh khurd improperly prevented 19 voters from inserting their ballot papers into ..... the present case the present case involves acceptance of alleged improper votes from people of the 21 localities in question which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDanavath @ Ramavath Tarabai Vs. Mudavath Prameela and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)ALT802
..... 2006 acted arbitrarily and biased manner and illegally received nomination improperly which ought to have been rejected because first respondent ..... 15 many irregularities and illegalities were committed while receiving the improper nomination of respondent no 1 by respondent no 3 which ..... down under section 211 iii that any nomination has been improperly rejected or accepted and iv that the result of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. P. Sharadamma W/O K.J. Nagegowda and Sri S.M. Gurunanjaiah S/O La ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-25-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)KarLJ481:2009(5)AIRKarR455
ordern kumar j 1 the petitioners have preferred this election petition tinder section 81 of the representation of people act...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Sri Vikram JaIn S/O Sri Bheemraj Jain, Pro ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-30-2009
Reported in: 2009(170)LC236(Karnataka); 2009(244)ELT504(Kar)
..... months the words five years were substituted 111 confiscation of improperly imported goods etc the following goods brought from a place ..... india the heading of the said section reads confication of improperly imported goods etc the various contingencies are the circumstances under ..... the confiscation of the goods in question were held as improper the tribunal remanded the matter back for adjudication by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Vijay S. Pradhan and Another Vs. Dr. Niteen C. Dedhia and Others
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-19-2009
per mr p n kashalkar honble presiding judicial member 1 by this common judgment we are disposing of two complaints...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Metarock (Pvt)ltd., Kollam, Repd. by Its Managing Director, Venodl ...
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: Nov-13-2009
shri m v viswanathan judicial member complaint filed under sec 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 claiming compensation of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajinder Kumar Sharma Vs. Jyoti Sharma
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Mar-30-2009
Reported in: AIR2009J& K59
that the court had jurisdiction but it exercised such jurisdiction improperly the consequence of the first episode would be total nullity
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishnamoorthy Vs. Sivakumar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2009
Reported in: (2009)5MLJ1255
..... the result of the election stood materially affected by the very improper acceptance of the nomination and hence nothing more is required ..... act 1951 namely that the nomination of the other candidate was improperly rejected all the parties before the delhi high court were ..... a returned candidate has been materially affected i by the improper acceptance of any nomination or ii by any corrupt practice .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial