Skip to content


Improperly - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: improperly Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 647 results (0.016 seconds)
Apr 03 2009 (TRI)

Dr. T. Dasaradha Rama Reddy Vs. P. Ramesh Babu and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Apr-03-2009

not mentioned anywhere that first operation was conducted negligently or improperly that necessitated second operation at nims the complainant assumes by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2009 (FN)

Horne Vs. Flores

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-25-2009

..... by requiring petitioners to demonstrate appropriate action through a particular funding mechanism it improperly substituted its own policy judgments for those of the state and local officials entrusted ..... to demonstrate appropriate action through a particular funding mechanism the court of appeals improperly substituted its own educational and budgetary policy judgments for those of the state and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 2009 (SC)

Laxmi Kant Bajpai Vs. Hazi Yaqoob and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-08-2009

Reported in: JT2009(15)SC315; 2009(14)SCALE447; 2010(1)LC149(SC)

..... it concerns the returned candidate has been materially affected by improper reception of votes and by non compliance of the ..... presiding officer for the polling station at village turveh khurd improperly prevented 19 voters from inserting their ballot papers into ..... the present case the present case involves acceptance of alleged improper votes from people of the 21 localities in question which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 19 2009 (HC)

Danavath @ Ramavath Tarabai Vs. Mudavath Prameela and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-19-2009

Reported in: 2009(6)ALT802

..... 2006 acted arbitrarily and biased manner and illegally received nomination improperly which ought to have been rejected because first respondent ..... 15 many irregularities and illegalities were committed while receiving the improper nomination of respondent no 1 by respondent no 3 which ..... down under section 211 iii that any nomination has been improperly rejected or accepted and iv that the result of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2009 (HC)

Smt. P. Sharadamma W/O K.J. Nagegowda and Sri S.M. Gurunanjaiah S/O La ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-25-2009

Reported in: 2009(6)KarLJ481:2009(5)AIRKarR455

ordern kumar j 1 the petitioners have preferred this election petition tinder section 81 of the representation of people act...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2009 (HC)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Sri Vikram JaIn S/O Sri Bheemraj Jain, Pro ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-30-2009

Reported in: 2009(170)LC236(Karnataka); 2009(244)ELT504(Kar)

..... months the words five years were substituted 111 confiscation of improperly imported goods etc the following goods brought from a place ..... india the heading of the said section reads confication of improperly imported goods etc the various contingencies are the circumstances under ..... the confiscation of the goods in question were held as improper the tribunal remanded the matter back for adjudication by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 2009 (TRI)

Dr. Vijay S. Pradhan and Another Vs. Dr. Niteen C. Dedhia and Others

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-19-2009

per mr p n kashalkar honble presiding judicial member 1 by this common judgment we are disposing of two complaints...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2009 (TRI)

M/S Metarock (Pvt)ltd., Kollam, Repd. by Its Managing Director, Venodl ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Nov-13-2009

shri m v viswanathan judicial member complaint filed under sec 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 claiming compensation of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2009 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Sharma Vs. Jyoti Sharma

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Mar-30-2009

Reported in: AIR2009J& K59

that the court had jurisdiction but it exercised such jurisdiction improperly the consequence of the first episode would be total nullity

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 15 2009 (HC)

Krishnamoorthy Vs. Sivakumar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-15-2009

Reported in: (2009)5MLJ1255

..... the result of the election stood materially affected by the very improper acceptance of the nomination and hence nothing more is required ..... act 1951 namely that the nomination of the other candidate was improperly rejected all the parties before the delhi high court were ..... a returned candidate has been materially affected i by the improper acceptance of any nomination or ii by any corrupt practice .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //