Improperly - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Lloyds Metals and Engineering Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT1144Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the above appeals arising out of separate orders of the commissioner of central excise appeals involve a common issue...

Cce Vs. Lloyds Metals and Engg. Ltd. and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(111)LC748Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the above appeals arising out of separate orders of the commissioner of central excise appeals involve a common issue...

G.C. Bafna Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2004)90ITD115(Pune.)

1 the assessee shri g c bafna is an individual and is the proprietor of m s g c b...

BolIn Chetia Vs. Jogadish Bhuyan and ors.

Court: Guwahati

a m saikia j 1 vanquished in the battle of ballots by a narrow margin of 196 votes the election...

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(1)BomCR776

..... assessment and therefore it cannot be said that the goods were improperly removed from the warehouse and consequently no interest could be levied ..... duty and therefore it cannot be said that the goods were improperly removed from the warehouse there is no merit in this ..... 72 of the customs act provides that where the goods are improperly removed from the warehouse then the proper officer is entitled to .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

the failed argument that bcra s amendments to feca 304 improperly extend to both express and issue advocacy plaintiffs challenge amended

Manga Ram Murthy and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD181

or his election agent c that any nomination has been improperly rejected or d that the result of the election insofar

Chaluvadi Hanumayamma Vs. Sandrapati Jainabee and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(5)ALT741

orderv eswaraiah j 1 this civil revision petition is filed against the order in i a no 946 2001 in...

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Pacific Export

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT531Tri(Mum.)bai

..... or its permitted extension the goods have been deemed to have been improperly removed from the warehouse under section 72 d c m and anr ..... expiry of the warehousing bond the same have to be treated as improperly removed from the warehouse and the duty would be payable at the ..... in such cases the goods are to be deemed to have been improperly removed from the warehouse and that the duty would be payable at .....

P.T. Rajan Vs. T.P.M. Sahir and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC4603; JT2003(Suppl2)SC613; 2003(3)KLT1081(SC); 2003(8)SCALE165; (2003)8SCC498

..... the number of votes secured by the candidate whose nomination was improperly accepted bore a fairly high proportion to the number of ..... in chhedi ram case 1984 1scr966 the candidate whose nomination was improperly accepted had obtained 6710 votes which was almost 20 times ..... number of votes secured by the candidate whose nomination was improperly accepted bore a fairly high proportion to the number of .....