Improperly - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Lloyds Metals and Engineering Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT1144Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the above appeals arising out of separate orders of the commissioner of central excise appeals involve a common issue...

Sri Mairembam Prithviraj @ Prithibiraj Singh Vs. Shri Pukhrem Sharatch ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

nomination of a returned candidate being declared as having been improperly accepted especially in a case where there are only two

Perry Vs. New Hampshire

Court: US Supreme Court

even com e into play unless the suggestive circumstances are improperly police arranged ante at 2 11 nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp

Cce Vs. Lloyds Metals and Engg. Ltd. and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(111)LC748Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the above appeals arising out of separate orders of the commissioner of central excise appeals involve a common issue...

Ramu Mahatang Patel Vs. Rajkumar Dayaram Patel and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(2)ALLMR223; 2005(2)MhLj127

..... weightage the respondent no 2 dr ramesh tukaram raikwar whose nomination paper has been improperly accepted has secured disproportionately large number of votes than the difference between the number ..... of the respondent elected candidate assuming that the nomination paper of another candidate was improperly accepted 18 the learned counsel for respondent no 1 further submitted that the caste .....

Regina Vs. Mushtaq (Appellant) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Cr ...

Court: House of Lords

2 is correctly stated by mirfield on silence confessions and improperly obtained evidence 1997 pp 51 52 it is the judicial

Sarnam Singh Vs. Pushpa Devi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1987(4)SC158; 1987(2)SCALE861; 1988Supp(1)SCC65; [1988]1SCR630

..... held while deciding an election petition that the nomination of the third candidate has been improperly accepted there is no justification to set aside the election of the successful candidate because ..... possibility that a sufficient number of votes actually cast for the candidate whose nomination was improperly accepted might have been cast for the candidate who secured the highest number of votes .....

Karikho Kri Vs. Nuney Tayang

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... leading to suppression it can be held at 28 that stage that the nomination was improperly accepted ms meenakshi arora learned senior counsel appearing for the election commission rightly argued that ..... return candidate as well as the respondent no 2 has been materially affected by such improper acceptance of their nominations though there are some general references to non compliance with particular .....

Amarinder Singh Vs. Special Committee, Punjab Vidhan Sabha and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

k g balakrishnan c j 1 the appellant was the chief minister of the state of punjab during the 12th...

Veera Gounder and ors. Vs. V. Ramaswamy Gounder and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1968)1MLJ146

..... election petitioners that the result of the election had been materially affected by the improper acceptance of the nomination their lordships envisaged three possible situations 1 where the ..... candidate whose nomination was improperly accepted has secured less votes than the difference between the returned candidate and the .....