First Amendment - Judgment Search Results

Ascent Constructions Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Compan ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(2008)BC472; 2008(103)DRJ118

required to look into allegations made in the complaint or fir and conclude whether prima facie offence is made out by

R. Parthasarathy Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)3MLJ401

..... been duly registered by the then jurisdictional registrar of societies chennai south and subsequent byelaw amendments filed by the music academy have also been registered by the present jurisdictional registrar ..... the society had purported to change the memorandum of association he has submitted that the first memorandum of association containing the names of the founder members cannot be altered in .....

Angammal and Vs. C. Sellamuthu and

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)1MLJ560

..... survivorship it was only after the hindu succession act was amended by the amendment act 39 of 2005 which has come into effect from ..... making it clear that the first defendant is entitled to 2 3rd share the only ground on which the amendment was sought to be ..... devolution of share to the plaintiffs when that is so the amendment has to be necessarily rejected in such circumstances the reliance placed .....

Rita Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the mandatory guidelines system where every judge could readily identify when the sixth amendment was being violated and could rule accordingly 3 proponents of substantive reasonableness review could ..... produce the apparent disuniformity that convinced congress to adopt guidelines sentencing in the first place but if sentencing judges attributed substantial gravitational pull to the now discretionary .....

Kadem Shaikh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2007)3CALLT129(HC),2007(3)CHN416

can never be said to be unconstitutional and the said amendment act of 2001 is quite in conformity with the statement

Kayam Singh S/O Sri Jai Ram and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1453

..... petitioners own admission he entered into possession after 1974 amendment and 1985 amendment cannot be given because the same is not retrospective ..... 1985 shall be substituted 3 on the strength of these amended provisions the petitioner defendant claimed that since the petitioner ..... benefit of 1985 amendment cannot be given to the petitioner and the view of the trial court and first appellate court was .....

Rotarian Sidheshwar Dayal and ors. Vs. Rotarian U.N. Maira and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(1)ARBLR298(Delhi); 2007(94)DRJ155

as is established in the bylaws of ri for the amendment of its bylaws section 2 who may propose amendments to

Dr. V.K. Rajan Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2008CriLJ909

..... the act is from 27th june 1940 to 1st april 1946 the criminal law amendment ordinance no 38 of 1944 was promulgated on ..... shall continue in force therein until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority then the ..... was continuing even after independence unless they are repealed or amended since ordinance under challenge was not rescinded it continued after .....

O.S. Venkataraman Vs. R.V.M.K. Prasad

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2007(4)CTC388; (2007)6MLJ1018

..... it is his argument that the series of amendments made by the appellant i e the first amendment in respect of plaint schedule the second amendment in respect of plaint prayer and the third ..... amendment with regard to schedule of property would only bring .....

Jagmohan Dalmiya Vs. the Board of Control for Cricket in India and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2008Cal227

..... resolution was adopted on 29th september 2000 for amendment of the bye laws of respondent bcci it was this amendment which introduced for the first time the definition of administrator administrator has ..... presumption that official acts were duly performed 103 mr kapoor submitted that the argument that amendments could not be permitted to be registered beyond the period of limitation was fallacious .....