First Amendment - Judgment Search Results

Dy. Cit Vs. Rajneesh Foundation

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Pune.)649

..... not taken cognizance of certain important facts viz i the first proposal for amendment of the trust deed was to delete the name of ..... in para 23 a and para 26 he has first noticed that the proposed amendment was to the effect that the assessee trust ..... the circumstances present during the relevant assessment year the trust was amended and without the physical presence of acharya rajneesh being allegedly .....

Board of Trustees of Univ. of AlA. Vs. Garrett

Court: US Supreme Court

..... authority are necessarily overridden by the power to enforce the civil war amendments by appropriate legislation those amendments were specifically designed as an expansion of federal power and an intrusion ..... on surface transportation of the house committee on public works and transportation 101st cong 1st sess 1990 americans with disabilities telecommunications relay services hearing on title v of h .....

Atwater Vs. Lago Vista

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1763 the paradigm search and seizure case for americans of the founding generation amar fourth amendment first principles 107 harv l rev 757 772 1994 also contain dicta suggesting a somewhat broader ..... different practices watson 423 u s at 429 powell j concurring see also amar fourth amendment first principles 107 harv l rev at 764 and n 14 340 all concerned about warrantless .....

Cook Vs. Gralike

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a right of the people to instruct their representatives into what would become the first amendment third and of decisive significance the means employed to issue the instructions ballots for ..... clause in discussing the elections clause issue respondents have also relied in part on first amendment cases upholding time place and manner regulations of speech brieffor respondents 13 14 although .....

Rasool and ors. Vs. Haji Usman and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

in this case what it prayed for by way of amendment is to correctly describe and identify the spring when vasil

indofer Society and ors. Vs. Director General of Foreign Trade and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)2CALLT257(HC),2001(134)ELT356(Cal)

..... is absolutely of no relevance in this situation the correct procedure would be to first grant amendment and thereafter to decide the question of territorial jurisdiction in support of his submission he ..... reasons for not deciding the question of jurisdiction while deciding the question of amendment are as follows 27 firstly on factual and legal aspect of this particular matter it appears to me .....

Karuthakkan Nadar Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Represented by ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ833

..... the application as no case has been made out for amendment and the amendment prayed for is impermissible being aggrieved the present revision ..... highly belated and even after three years of filing of the first appeal the said application has been filed the respondents also ..... principal reasons that have led to the rule last mentioned are first that the object of courts and rules of procedure is .....

Poonam Vij and ors. Vs. the Thapar Institute of Engineering and Techno ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2001P& H378

..... cgpa of less than 4 at the end of first year as already observed this regulation was amended on 2 7 1999 and the amended regulation has already been reproduced in the earlier ..... regulation 17 as it originally stood with the amended provision it is clear that prior to the amendment a student was required to repeat the first year if he did not satisfy the .....

Anand NaraIn Singh Vs. U.P. Secondary Education Service, Selection Boa ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2001)2UPLBEC959

..... rules 1998 the rules 7 the principal act has been amended on few occasions but five amendments are relevant here they were first introduced by ordinances and then replaced by the acts for ..... convenience i am indicating last five amending acts only i the u .....

B. Meenakshi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD96; 2002(2)ALT473

..... in service candidate for the purpose of service reservation quota the challenge to this amendment is two fold first it is contended that exclusion of such in service candidates who have pg ..... degree there was no such prohibition and that being a condition of service the impugned amendment cannot be given restrospectivity divesting petitioners of vested right we shall deal with these questions .....