First Amendment - Judgment Search Results

Vernonia School Dist. 47j Vs. Acton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... significant intrusion into an area of primary educational responsibility fourth amendment rights no less than first and fourteenth amendment rights are different in public schools than elsewhere the reasonableness ..... searches of private residences we upheld the suspicionless search only after first recognizing the fourth amendment s longstanding preference for a suspicion based search regime and then .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... against constitutionalizing its holding as the majority does today the first we have already seen the hans court misread the eleventh amendment see supra at 118 123 it also misunderstood the ..... suits brought by same state plaintiffs hans does not hold however that the eleventh amendment or any other constitutional provision precludes federal courts from entertaining actions brought by citizens .....

Curtiss-wright Corp. Vs. Schoonejongen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... made to and from the plan requiring every plan to have a coherent amendment procedure serves several laudable goals first for a plan not to have such a procedure would risk rendering ..... like the identification procedure is more substantial than might first appear it says the plan may be amended by a unilateral company decision to amend and only by such a decision and not .....

Mcintyre Vs. Ohio Elections Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... affirming the state supreme court held that the burdens 3599 09 a imposed on voters first amendment rights were reasonable and nondiscriminatory and therefore valid declaring that 3599 09 a is intended ..... are of course fundamental rights id at 373 concurring opinion although the text of the first amendment provides only that congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech justice brandeis .....

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the possibility that some future application of the statute might violate the first amendment justifies a departure from our traditional rules governing constitutional adjudication 413 u s at ..... concurring in the judgment constitute remarkable departures from the settled course of our first amendment jurisprudence the most obvious perhaps is their refusal to consider the present application of .....

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1995)111PLR387

62 of list ii of the seventy schedule 39 vide amendment of section 4 of the andhra pradesh act it was

Sadh Ram and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2(1996)ACC218

..... under section 166 of the act of 1988 as amended by act of 1994 8 we first have a look at the statement of objects ..... section 95 2 a of the motor vehicles act 1939 was amended by amending act 1969 the liability of the insurance company in respect of ..... such an intention is ascertained the court has to give the amending provision a purposeful and functional interpretation if rigid construction would lead .....

Sadh Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1996ACJ880

..... section 166 of the act of 1988 as amended by act of 1994 12 we first have a look at the statement of objects ..... section 95 2 a of the motor vehicles act 1939 was amended by amending act 1969 the liability of the insurance company in respect of ..... such an intention is ascertained the court has to give the amending provision a purposeful and functional interpretation if rigid construction would lead .....

Mantu Naik Vs. Bankim Chandra Maity and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1998)3CALLT160(HC)

..... judgment on all issues were substituted by the amendment of 1976 with effect from 1st of february 1977 order xiv rule 2 sub ..... an intcrlocutary application in separation of other issues under the amended order xiv of the code of civil procedure that decision ..... that issue first 19 a comparative reading of the aforesaid provisions as it existed prior to the amendment and after the amendment would clearly .....

Tata Construction and Projects Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1997]89CompCas161(Cal)

should the aids which parliament availed of such as the report of a special committee preceding the enactment the existing state them the only exception to that rule is when the amendment is in relation to procedural matters the said decision has