First Amendment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: first amendment Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 505 results (0.15 seconds)P.N.P. Nair, Manager of Vijay Transport Agencies Ltd., Vs. the Board o ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Bom285; 2003(2)ALLMR956; 2003(3)MhLj279
..... held by the single bench that the requirement of section 41 as it stood before amendment was that possession had to be demanded from the occupier also and on his refusal ..... come to the conclusion that the said contention has been corroborated by the evidence it firstly pointed out that the court summons was issued in misc notice no 1009 of 1974 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a Statutory Corporation C ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-08-2002
Reported in: AIR2004Bom44; 2004(163)ELT22(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj689
from the observations in para 9 of that decision the first question considered was whether the scale of fees under which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHope Vs. Pelzer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-2002
..... federal district court decisions specifically rejecting prisoners claims that alabama prison guards violated their eighth amendment rights by attaching them to a restraining bar as well as a state regulation ..... v in response to justice thomas thoughtful dissent we make the following three observations the first is that in granting certiorari to review the summary judgment entered in favor of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFesto Corp. Vs. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-28-2002
..... element petitioner asserts this holding departs from past precedent in two respects first it applies estoppel to every amendment made to satisfy the requirements of the patent act and not just ..... alloy in the festo product were both disclosed for the first time in the amended applications in smc s view these amendments narrowed the earlier applications surrendering alternatives that are the very .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEldred Vs. Ashcroft
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-09-2002
..... s oh pretty woman may be fair use the ctea itself supplements these traditional first amendment safeguards first it allows libraries archives and similar institutions to reproduce and distribute display or ..... 201 copyright legislation has a similar history the federal copyright act was first amended in 1831 that amendment like later amendments not only authorized a longer term for new works but also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxminarayan Vs. Shivlal Gujar and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2002
Reported in: AIR2003MP49; [2004(1)JCR203(MP)]; 2002(4)MPHT463
..... the provisions of rule 1 of order xx of the first schedule as amended by section 13 of this act shall not apply to ..... a high court which were inconsistent with the code as amended by the amending act stood repealed irrespective of the fact whether the corresponding ..... in sub section 2 the provisions of the code as amended by the amending act shall apply to every suit proceeding appeal or application .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjit Kumar Saha Vs. Ashit Kumar Saha
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-22-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Cal148,(2002)3CALLT503(HC)
10 in turn in his reply mr bhattacharya submits that amendment can be allowed at any stage of the proceeding and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFederal Maritime Comm'n Vs. South Carolina Ports Authority
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-28-2002
..... justice breyer asserts by use of analogy that this case implicates the first amendment right of citizens to petition the federal government for a redress ..... s 1 18 1890 and a private party plainly has no first amendment right to haul a state in front of either an article ..... 479 u s 305 311 1987 they also described in the first amendment the right of a citizen to petition the federal government for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLicensed Building Surveyors Association and anr. Vs. State of West Ben ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-09-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)CHN659
..... behalf of the added respondents have challenged the validity of certain amendments effected to certain specified rules 7 i shall first deal with the contentions of the writ petitioners and then the ..... of the writ petitioners i shall consider the last point first 8 in support of the contention that inasmuch as the amendments to the rules have not been laid before the state .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Model Manufacturing Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)3CALLT579(HC)
..... account of enhancement of rent cannot arise before the issuance of the letter dated 1st december 1995 the amendment incorporating this claim is made within the prescribed period thus the claim is ..... procedure b the document being letter on behalf of the defendants respondents dated 1st december 1995 on which the amendment is sought for was not only available before the institution of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial