First Amendment - Judgment Search Results

DHAMADHARAN (Amended as)R.Dhamotharan, Vs KOWSALYA

Court: Chennai

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI and R.Dhamotharan .. Appellant Vs. Kowsalya .. Respondent Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of...

(Cause Title Amended) Abdul Gafoor vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Court: Kerala

above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE SPRAPPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 07.01.2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. CR.NO.06/2020 BEFORE JFCM-1 MANJERI, DATED 07.01.2020. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: … A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 16TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.1605 OF 2020(A) PETITIONER:(CAUSE TITLE AMENDED) ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. MONUTTY, ARACKALVETTATH HOUSE, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR-680002. CAUSE TITLE IS AMENDED TO SHOW THAT

Amended Cwp No. 1022 of 2010 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

by the petitioner on 18/19.1.2006. Petitioner was immediately suspended and a departmental inquiry was initiated against him. An FIR dated 31.1.2006 stood registered for the offence of theft committed on 18/19.1.2006 wherein the accused were apprehended on … IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.1022 of 2010 Date of Decision :23. 11.2012 Ram Singh ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others

Amended Cwp No.9201 of 1994 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.9201 of 1994 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.9201 of 1994 Date of decision:29. 11.2012 Gurbax Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents

Amended Cwp No.3754 of 1994 Vs. Municipal Committee and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

unaware of that provision when examining the whole provision. Repeatingly and summingly, we hold that the Commissioner must first do the exercise under clause (b) to determine at what figure the building may reasonably be expected to … purposes of the question arising in the present petition and the said Sub-clause (b) reads, prior to its amendment in the year 1994, as under:" (1) "annual value" means - (a) ***** Amended CWP No.3754 of 1994

Amendment Sought in His Written Statement by the Petitioner- Vs. Ashok ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr.Raj Kumar Chandana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. (Oral) 1. Amendment sought in his written statement by the petitioner- tenant has been declined vide order dated 7.5.2014 (Annexure P-5)

In Re Amendment to Rule 39

Court: US Supreme Court

In re Amendment to Rule 39 - 500 U.S. 13 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court In re Amendment to Rule 39, 500

Girija Indran vs (Amended)the Coir Vyavasaya Co-Operative Society No. ...

Court: Kerala

THE PETITIONER SHOWING HER SERVICE DETAILS,31.07.19. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT SOCIETY DATED 16.08.19. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE,

K.Kunjunni vs the Administrator (Amended)

Court: Kerala

16.2.2019 OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNION. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 27.10.2018 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES DATED 3.1.2019. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY

Vinjamuri Venkatanarasimhacharyulu Vs. Jami Gangaraju (Amended As) Gan ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1941Mad607; (1941)1MLJ554

which it is said there is no direct authority.2. The petitioner brought the suit for recovery of the first year's rent payable under a registered kadapa executed by the respondent on 23rd May, 1935, for a term