First Amendment - Judgment Search Results

Amended Cwp No. 1022 of 2010 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

by the petitioner on 18/19.1.2006. Petitioner was immediately suspended and a departmental inquiry was initiated against him. An FIR dated 31.1.2006 stood registered for the offence of theft committed on 18/19.1.2006 wherein the accused were apprehended on … IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.1022 of 2010 Date of Decision :23. 11.2012 Ram Singh ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others

Amended Cwp No.9201 of 1994 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.9201 of 1994 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.9201 of 1994 Date of decision:29. 11.2012 Gurbax Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents

Amended Cwp No.3754 of 1994 Vs. Municipal Committee and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

unaware of that provision when examining the whole provision. Repeatingly and summingly, we hold that the Commissioner must first do the exercise under clause (b) to determine at what figure the building may reasonably be expected to … purposes of the question arising in the present petition and the said Sub-clause (b) reads, prior to its amendment in the year 1994, as under:" (1) "annual value" means - (a) ***** Amended CWP No.3754 of 1994

Amendment Sought in His Written Statement by the Petitioner- Vs. Ashok ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr.Raj Kumar Chandana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. (Oral) 1. Amendment sought in his written statement by the petitioner- tenant has been declined vide order dated 7.5.2014 (Annexure P-5)

In Re Amendment to Rule 39

Court: US Supreme Court

In re Amendment to Rule 39 - 500 U.S. 13 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court In re Amendment to Rule 39, 500

Vinjamuri Venkatanarasimhacharyulu Vs. Jami Gangaraju (Amended As) Gan ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1941Mad607; (1941)1MLJ554

which it is said there is no direct authority.2. The petitioner brought the suit for recovery of the first year's rent payable under a registered kadapa executed by the respondent on 23rd May, 1935, for a term

In Re: the Bill to Amend S. 20 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and S. 3 o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1964]3SCR787

whether the context ofArt. 289 requires a different meaning to be given to the word'taxation'. But let us first see what happens if we read Art. 289(1)by substituting for the expression 'taxation' the words which Art.366(28) says … Salt Act, 1944 (Act 1 of 1944); And whereas Governments ofcertain States have expressed the view that the amendments as proposed in thesaid draft of the Bill may not be constitutionally valid as the provisions ofarticle 289.

Mr. Surendran Nair.P.V vs the Assistant General Manager Syndicate Bank ...

Court: Kerala

PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, HEAD OFFICE,DOOR NO. 16/355 & 16/365A, MANIPAL UDUPI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE-576 104. ** NAME AND ADDRESS AMENDED AS CANARA BANK, HEAD OFFICE AT 112, J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU- 560002 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AS PER

Basheer Ahammed C.K vs State of Kerala * Amended

Court: Kerala

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19619 OF 2023 PETITIONER: BASHEER AHAMMED C.K AGED 65 YEARS S/O ALAVI, CHENNAMKULANGARA HOUSE, … PIN - 679339 BY ADVS. SADIQALI.M E.K.ABDUL SALAM SHAMNAD.E. DHANYA S NAIR C.A.SABITHA RESPONDENTS:1 STATE OF KERALA * AMENDED REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. * AMENDED THE ADDRESS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT IS

Ajeeb C.a, vs Revenue Divisional Officer (*Cause Title Amended)

Court: Kerala

to the 3rd respondentAgricultural Officer to provide sufficient inputs required under the Act and the Rules to the 1st respondent Revenue Divisional Officer or the officer authorised under Section 2(XVA) of the Act within two months from … H.NUJUMUDEEN ANTONY SHYJU RESPONDENTS: 1 [REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER THOPPUMPADY P.O, KOCHI THALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682001]*CAUSE TITLE AMENDED CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS - REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOCHI, RDO OFFICE, FORTKOCHI P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682001 AS PER THEORDER