Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 2006 Page 6 of about 5,322 results (0.313 seconds)

Jul 03 2006 (HC)

NitIn Nagpal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ745

..... same in evidence without any formal proof thereof. the following are the government scientific experts mentioned in sub-section (4) of section 293.(a) any chemical examiner or assistant chemical examiner to government;(b) the chief inspector of explosives;(c) the director of the finger print bureau;(d) the director, haffkeine institute, bombay;(e) the ..... statement of one injured had not been recorded; (2) the central forensic science laboratory report had not been obtained/not filed; (3) sanction under section 39 of the arms act, 1959 had not been obtained/not filed. submissions were made at length with regard to whether the challan was complete or incomplete and the same ..... the substance seized was ganja or not. and, the chemical analyser's report would determine whether the provisions of the narcotic drug and psychotropic substances act 1985 were attracted or not. the court held that in such a situation the magistrate undoubtedly could not proceed to take cognizance of the offence in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2006 (HC)

Rajen Singh (A.P.S.) Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-21-2006

..... area, prohibiting the assembly of five or more persons or the carrying of weapons or things capable of being used as weapons or fire-arms, ammunition and explosive substances.section 5 : powers to destroy arms, fortified positions, etc. - any magistrate or police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector or any officer of the ..... s movement of human rights air 1998 sc 431 (supra).16. for the sake of clarity, let me quote hereinbelow, section 6 of the said act, which reads as follows:section 6 : protection of persons acting under sections 4 and 5 - no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall be instituted except with the previous sanction of the ..... substituted.(2) no court shall take cognizance of any offence alleged to have been committed by any member of the armed forces of the union while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, except with the previous sanction of the central government.(3) the state government may, by notification, direct that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2006 (TRI)

Amitabh Bachchan Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-05-2006

..... machinery ltd. (supra)), the question was allowallibility of expenditure on technical know-how for five years. at page 688, the hon'ble delhi high court held that section 37(1) of the act requires that the expenditure should not be of a capital nature. the court held, the question whether a particular expenditure is revenue, incurred for the purpose of business ..... and spread over a period of sixteen years.31. the learned dr further relied upon the decision of the hon'ble calcutta high court in the case of indian explosives ltd v. cit wherein expenditure for constructing a building on land taken or licence for a period of ten years with an option for renewal for another ten years, ..... , shri y.p. trivedi and shri v.h. patil. according to them, this is to be treated as revenue expenditure and claimed to be allowable under section 37(l) of the act.8. assessing officer rejected assessec's claim on the basis of the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of empire jute co.ltd. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2006 (HC)

Cheif General Manager/thermal Power Station-i, Neyveli Lignite Corpora ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-31-2006

Reported in : (2007)1LLJ128Mad

..... after 00.30 hrs. the learned counsel further submitted that the heart attack suffered by the deceased cannot be deemed to be an accident within the meaning of section 3 of the act, and that there must be a causal connection between the accidental injury and the employment. the expression 'employment' cannot be confined to the mere nature of ..... other motor vehicle the tanker had fallen on one of its sides on sloping ground resulting in escape of highly inflammable petrol and that there was great risk of explosion and fire from the petrol coming out of the tanker. in these circumstances it could be said that the collision between the tanker and the other vehicle which ..... had occurred earlier to the escape of petrol from the tanker which ultimately resulted in the explosion and fire were not unconnected but related events and merely because there was interval of about four to four and half hours between the said collision and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2006 (HC)

Mehar Singh Rathi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-26-2006

Reported in : (2006)144PLR349

..... with effect from 30.12.1976. caltex oil refining (india) ltd. was later on amalgamated with the appellant herein in terms of sub-section 3 of section 7 of the said act. the appellant herein thus was at liberty to renew the period of lease for a period of further five years with effect from 1.8.1979 ..... turn of the century. as a strategy after evaluating various alternative scenarios for development it has been realised and recognised that in order to save delhi from population explosion it is necessary to moderate the growth in the areas around it. at the same time it is also recognised that any additional population in the dma ..... its undertakings in india stood transferred to and vested in the central government. the central government however in exercise of its power conferred upon it under section 9 of the said act directed that the said undertakings shall instead of continuing to vest in the central government vest in caltex oil refining (india) ltd. a government company .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2006 (HC)

The State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-18-2006

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar20; [2007(1)JCR345(Jhr)]

..... lease with the sanction of collector, the lessor's permission is not required. the learned advocate general has further argued that in view of the re-organization act and particularly section 42 thereof, the property within the territory of the state of jharkhand, belongs to the state of jharkhand. there seems to be no dispute about this. ..... appellant that the learned single judge has permitted establishment of the pump without there being any license and the prayer of the appellant for a direction to the explosive department having not been allowed the judgment is liable to be set aside. suffice it to say that no person can store, sell or transport petroleum ..... .c., dated 22nd june, 2005 at the request of the respondent no. 1 as per the requirements of explosive department. respondent no. 1 was also issued license by the explosive department under the provisions of the petroleum act on 07.07.2005 enabling it to establish the petrol pump and carry on its operations. while the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2006 (HC)

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Rana Dev Sutradhar and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-18-2006

..... in national insurance co. ltd. v. mastan and anr. 2005 air scw 6305. the hon'ble supreme court held as follows:13. section 143 occurs in chapter x of the 1988 act. section 144 contains a non-obstinate clause stating that the provisions of the said chapter shall have effect notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of ..... vehicle with crpf personnel on way to rangjuli. on the way at bhalukjuli, while passing over a wooden bridge, the vehicle was blown off by a remote controlled explosive device by extremists. as a result, dara singh sutradhar along with two other persons died. the vehicle was insured with the appellant company. the death of the driver ..... the objection raised.6. at the time of admission of this appeal no substantial question of law was formulated as is required under the proviso to section 30 of the act. considering the pleadings, it has been decided to hear this appeal on the following question of law:whether the respondents-claimants who are the brother and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2006 (HC)

Sri Akshaya Kumar Parida Vs. the Collector and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-17-2006

Reported in : 2006(II)OLR40

..... distributor of lpg at jajpur town by the hindustan petroleum corporation limited (in short 'hpc ltd.'). he has applied for grant of licence for possession of cylinder under the indian explosives act, 1884 and the same was obtained and also purchased a land and made huge investment by taking land from different sources. after receiving the letter of appointment from the regional manager .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2006 (SC)

Ravinder Singh Gorkhi Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-12-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2157; 2006CriLJ2791; 130(2006)DLT602(SC); JT2006(5)SC468; 2006(5)SCALE682; (2006)5SCC584

..... placed by mr. mishra on bhoop ram v. state of u.p. : 1990crilj2671 , wherein the appellant was treated to be a child within the meaning of section 2(4) of the act; upon taking into consideration three factors: (i) that the appellant had produced a school certificate and correctness whereof was not questioned; (ii) the learned trial judge ..... was upon the election petitioner but for proving the facts which were within the special knowledge of the respondent, the burden was upon him in terms of section 106 of the evidence act. it is also trite that when both parties have adduced evidence, the question of the onus of proof becomes academic [see union of india v. sugauli ..... basis of the materials on records. it will be a matter of appreciation of evidence adduced by the parties. different standards having regard to the provision of section 35 of the evidence act cannot be applied in a civil case or a criminal case. mr. mishra, however, would urge that while in a civil dispute a strict proof may .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2006 (TRI)

Arti Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-03-2006

..... the consignment does not contain any type of arms, ammunition, cartridges, shells, mines, radio active contaminated or any other explosive material. in the absence of such certificate the consignment was seized and confiscated under provisions of section 111(d) of the customs act, 1962 with an option to redeem the same on payment of fine of rs. 1,75,000/-. a penalty of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //