Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: kolkata Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 160 results (0.065 seconds)

Sanjay Sonkar Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007CriLJ954

..... each and to pay a fine of rs. 1000/- each in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months each for the offences under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act.2. sanjay sonkar preferred criminal appeal no. 5 of 2005 challenging his order of conviction and sentence and at the time of hearing of ..... collected by pratul chandra sarkar and himself, he submitted charge sheet against both sanjay sonkar @ drum and mahabir singh under section 302/34 of the ipc and also under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act.6. the learned trial judge, after framing charges against both the appellants, called upon the prosecution to examine its witnesses ..... consideration would be whether the learned additional sessions judge was legally and factually justified in convicting both the appellants under section 302/34 of the ipc and also under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act for the death of sew sankar misra.24. we find from the judgment impugned in these appeals that the .....

Meeting Sk. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN271

..... in that manner. on the basis of such complaint/fir mayureshwar p.s. case no. 39/95 dated 27.4.95 under section 460 of the ipc read with section 9(b)(ii) of the indian explosives act (in short i.e. act) was started against accused meeting sk. and moslem sk. (the present appellants). after completing investigation the investigating officer (in short i.o ..... .) submitted chargesheet against the appellants moslem sk. and meeting sk. under section 458/326/307/34 of ipc and under section 9(b)(ii) of the i.e. act. the trial that followed .....

Manoj Singh and Dharma Mahato @ Dharam Nath Mahato and ors. Vs. State ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN123

..... for the defence when firearm was not seized. the ballistic expert in such a situation only would have reported that the used bullets contain materials of explosive substance and some amount of gun shot residue. non-sending of blood-stained earth for chemical examination and pellets for ballistic examination is not fatal in ..... relatives of the deceased dinanath dubey are not witnesses of the occurrence and naturally no adverse presumption could be drawn against the prosecution under section 114(g) of the evidence act for non-examination of relatives of deceased. dhananjay singh as it appears only gave a cryptic information relating to the incident and it was ..... presence of witnesses was marked ext. 3. he also seized remnants of exploded bomb including burnt jute having smell of explosive substance, some pieces of small sticks, some small nails having smell of explosive substance and two live bombs by preparing a seizure list (ext. 4). during investigation he received one case docket from .....

The State of West Bengal Vs. Sankar Sundar Dutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4234

..... of rs. 5,000/- each in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months each, respondents sankar sundar dutta and pranab nag being convicted under section 3 of the explosive substance act are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 500 each in default rigorous imprisonment for three months ..... bombs and they charged bombs at uday and naresh and for that reason they are found guilty under section 3 of the explosive substance act. we do not find any material on record to hold the respondents guilty under section 307/34 of the ipc for attempting to murder bombaia alias all reja and kalyan biswas and at ..... sankar sundar dutta and pranab nag were carrying bombs and naturally, apart from the charge under section 302/34 of the ipc both of them are liable to be convicted under section 3 of the explosive substance act.63. the charge under arms act as framed against subhasish mukherjee was disbelieved by the learned trial court since there was no .....

The State of West Bengal Vs. Mr. Tarique Akhtar Alias Raja and

Court : Kolkata

..... of the opposite party no. 2, so the local police started a separate case being mango (azadnagar) p.s. case no. 38 dated 01/2/2006 under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substance act. the opposite party no. 2 was also shown arrested in connection with bowbazar p.s. case and the articles were also shown to have been seized in ..... justified. as the matter involves transfer of a case from one state to another state, so the learned chief judicial magistrate, jamshedpur was not authorized to pass such order under section 186(b) cr.p.c. which runs as under:high court to decide, in case of doubt, district where enquiry or trial shall take place: * * * * * * * *(b) if the courts are .....

Basir Sk., Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN111

..... directly from the victim himself, the learned judge made no mistake either in fact or in law in convicting the appellants under section 302/34 of the ipc and under section 9b(1)(b) of the indian explosives act.16. we have heard and considered submissions of both mr. basu and mr. sengupta and we have also examined the ..... and finding a strong prima facie case against all the five appellants, charge-sheet was submitted against all of them under section 302/34 of the ipc and also under section 9b(1)(b) of the indian explosives act.5. the learned additional sessions judge after framing charges against the appellants on the basis of police papers explained the charges ..... /34 of the ipc and sk. basir and manjur ali were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year each for the offence under section 9b(1)(b) of the indian explosives act.7. mr. basu, appearing in support of the appeal has seriously challenged the conviction order as well as the consequential order of sentence as recorded .....

Gulf (Oil) Corporation Limited Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited an ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN718

..... it came to the knowledge of the petitioner, that is when he received the letter, the communication of acceptance became complete against the respondents. under section 5 of the contract act, the proposal could be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance was complete as against the petitioner, but not afterwards. therefore, ..... pleads that there is a live dispute between the petitioner and the respondents on the following three points:a) whether there is any agreement to supply the explosives to the respondents by the petitioner herein in terms of the loi dated 19th november, 2004,b) whether the clause 14 of the loi dated 19th november ..... the petitioner on 7th december, 2004. the petitioner also received another letter 7th december, 2004 advising the petitioner to resume supply of the balance quantity of explosives, that is the quantity mentioned in the tender notice minus the quantity already supplied by the petitioner on 3rd november, 2004 and 16th november, 2004. again .....

Subir Guha Thakurta Vs. Johnson and Johnson Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN459,[2006(110)FLR606],(2006)3LLJ408Cal

..... on the evidence adduced by the parties, the writ court should interfere with the conclusions of the tribunal and he relied upon the decisions reported in baldev singh v. indian explosive ltd. 76 cwn 342, raza textiles ltd., rampur v. income tax officer : [1973]87itr539(sc) (supra) where the hon'ble supreme court held that whether ..... service and pay him back wages within 30 days from the date of publication of the award.7. subsequent thereto, in pursuance of the provisions of section 17 of the said act, governor was pleased to publish the said award by a notification dated september 10, 2003.8. the respondent company filed a writ petition before this ..... 2003 published the award.5. the learned tribunal came to conclusion that sri subir guhathakurta appellant herein, falls within the definition of the workman under section 2(s) of the said act and also held that the reference is maintainable in law issues referred before the learned tribunal are that (a) whether the termination of service of .....

Coal India Ltd Vs. Indian Explosive Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN433

..... in the said letter, the following are mentioned as the references :(1) cil tender no. cil/c2d/sec.ii/bulk loading explosives/2005-06/26 dtd. 11.01.2005 and opened on 12.02.2005.(2) offer no. bulk loading explosives/iel/ts/2005-06/02 dated 12.02.2005.(3) the letter dtd. 11.04.2005 and subsequent ..... informed by reason. in appropriate cases, action uniformed by reason may be questioned as arbitrary in proceedings under article 226 or article 32 of the constitution....the state acts in his executive power under article 298 of the constitution in entering or not entering in contracts with individual parties. article 14 of constitution would be applicable to ..... without a remedy, but writ petition is certainly not that remedy.27. for suggesting that the coal india could not have added the supplementary clause. sections 10, 13 and 14 of the contract act were relied upon by sri ray as also the three reported decisions, they being 0065/1965 : [1966]1scr656 , bhagwandas goverdhandas kedia v. girdharlal .....

Purnendu Kumar Sengupta Vs. Sandip Bagchi Alias Bhola and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)2CALLT24(HC)

..... below failed to appreciate the same and convict o.p. nos. 1 & 2 invoking the provision of section 113a of the evidence act. mr. mitra further contended that had it really been a case of accidental death on account of explosion of stove, the stove and cooking utensils in that case would have been seized by the i.o ..... complainant that her daughter was abetted to commence suicide. hence, both the accused were charged under section 498a/306 ipc.3. the defence case is a plea of innocence and that the victim kakali died accidentally by fire due to explosion of stove.4. twenty-two witnesses were examined on behalf of the prosecution, while none ..... of must be decided to a certain degree by reference to the parties capacity or incapacity for endurance. section 306 ipc provides for the penal provision for abetment to commit suicide. presumption under section 113a of the evidence act could be invoked only when the prosecution has discharged the initial burden of proving that the appellant had subjected .....