Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 239 results (0.228 seconds)

The Government of Karnataka Represented by the Executive Engineer Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR328(Kar); ILR2006KAR1640; 2006(3)KarLJ360

..... provides the manner of blasting. it states that blasting in a manner to produce over-breakage shall not be permitted. the blasting shall be done by using explosive best suited to the strata concerned so as to avoid undue over break. it further states that special care shall be taken to prevent over breakages or loosening ..... the case. after registering the petition, the court issued notices to the claimant as also to the department. the department has filed a petition under section 30 of the arbitration act disputing the award of the arbitrator. the civil court on consideration of the contentions of the parties has passed the aforementioned judgment and decree. the department ..... rate of interest in concerned, it is pointed out that award of interest at 18% is on a higher side. the court having regard to section 29 of the arbitration act ought to have awarded interest at a reasonable rate.6. on the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the claimant broadly submits that the award does .....

The State by the Psi of Bhatkal Town Police Station Vs. Karim M. S/O M ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , therefore the prosecution has successfully proved the guilt of possession of the country bombs by all the accused persons. the accused are convicted under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 r/w section 34 ipc. the accused are sentenced to r.i. for a period of two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 20,000/- each in default to ..... investigation, the charge sheet is filed. the trial court finds that there were five inmates and only 3 bombs were found hence comes to the conclusion that conscious possession of explosives by the accused is not proved and acquitted them.4. the evidence of p.w.1 the panch witness and the evidence of pws. 2 to 5 who were the ..... k. sreedhar rao, j.1. a.1 to a.5 were charged for offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act 1908. the facts of the prosecution disclose that on 10-11-1997 at 7-30 p.m. a1 is the driver of the jeep bearing no. kl-11/c-5925, .....

Shri J. Ramaraj S/O Sri Jyothi Raj Vs. Iliyaz Khan S/O Janab Mohammed ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR4672

..... decision reported in 2001(1) kccr 437 in the case of sri. g. premdas v. sri. venkataraman to contend that the provision of section 139 introduced in the act as a presumption. this presumption is available for the holder of the cheque and unless the complainant discharges the basic requirements of proof of commission ..... intrinsic circumstance of suspicious character and material legal infirmities will definitely displaces the complainant's story and that accused successfully rebuts the presumption under section 139 of the negotiable instruments act. further, he also relied upon the decision of the madras high court reported in : air1992mad183 in the case of m. mahadevan pillai ..... shift the burden stating that it is the company which is the principal and the petitioner is only a commission agent and relying upon section 28 of the negotiable instruments act, contended that the principal is liable and not the commission agent. in this regard, the petitioner has also sought the assistance of .....

B.R. Vasudevamurthy S/O. H.D. Ramaswamy and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Hon

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007(1)KAR1034; 2007(2)KCCRSN97; 2007(3)AIRKarR71(DB)

..... personal and miscellaneous inams of the inamdars in respect of the lands in question, the rights and privileges given to them were conferred under sections 9, 14 to 17 of the act. section 9 of the act makes it explicitly clear that with effect on and from the date of vesting of the inam lands with the state government, the ..... are in their possession, in unequivocal terms has stated in its order that the lands are inam lands; that application was filed by the inamdars under section 10 of the act within the period of limitation prescribed in the statute was pending for registration of occupancy rights of the granted lands in their favour before the land tribunal ..... become final and the correctness of the same cannot be questioned by the petitioners in these proceedings. since their claim application to register them as occupants under section 10 of the act r/w relevant rule of the rules was pending as on the date of relaxation order passed by the state government and grant order passed by the .....

Rajashree Cement, a Unit of Grasim Industries Limited, by Its Deputy G ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ400

..... , the levy is sustained and any demand thereunder is also sustainable.26. learned government advocate would also submit that the levy under sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act being confined to two categories of consumers, viz., consumers who generate electricity themselves and consume it, and the consumers who get such electricity ..... , if had fetched them such exemption, there was no distinction between the other tax payers as consumers and the present provision of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act, therefore created an additional burden only on persons like the petitioners by identifying them as a class and this is making a classification without ..... an additional liability whereas all other consumers are not burdened with this additional liability, but if at all subjected to tax only under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act. to drive home the argument that the levy brings about an unreasonable and artificial classification, learned counsel for the petitioners would draw my .....

Employees State Insurance Corporation Rep. by Its Assistant Director V ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR378]

..... sum of rs. 30,674/- and the said order of the corporation came to be assailed before the esi court under an application filed under section 75 of the act of 1948 by the respondent and based on the material placed by both sides, the esi court came to the conclusion that the respondent-establishment was ..... definition of 'manufacturing process' or not and the answer to this question would decide the out come of this appeal also.7. 'manufacturing process' is defined under section 2(k) of the factories act, 1948 thus:2(k) 'manufacturing process' means any process for-(i) making, altering repairing, ornamenting, finishing, packing, oiling, washing, cleaning, breaking up, ..... fixed by the central government by notification and therefore, the question of any other person being excluded from definition of the employee as defined under section 2(9)(a) of the act will not arise. therefore, the aforesaid decision referred to by the learned counsel for the respondent is not applicable to the case on hand. .....

The Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. Represented by Its General Manage ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR226; 2007(2)KLJ164; 2007(1)KCCR469; 2007(2)AIRKarR1; AIR2007NOC936(DB)

..... single judge's order quashing the proceedings of the technical committee. we fully appreciate the learned single judge's anxiety that the state and its instrumentalities should act in a fair manner that they should not resort to pick and choose methods, that they do not either unduly favour any tenderer and unreasonably eliminate any ..... authority.(ii) sri parasaran submits that the procedure followed in the instant case by the appellant-kpcl is in substantial compliance with the provisions of the transparency act and rules.(iii) he submits that the tender scrutiny committee of the appellant-kpcl has not given any findings as to whether or not the second respondent ..... . further, the appellant-kpcl was directed to re-notify and to call for fresh tenders to award the contract following the procedure as stipulated under the transparency act and rules.6. aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the appellants kpcl and m/s. south india corporation ltd. have presented writ appeal nos. 1730/2006 and .....

B.M.T.C. Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. Smt. T.R. Vijaya W/O ...

Court : Karnataka

..... attempt to award damages as far as many can compensate loss. loss of curing and. earning should also be adequately compensated.heard note 'c' reads thus:motor vehicles act, 1988 -section 173 - personal inquiry cases - compensation - the injured has to be compensated (1) for pain and suffering (2) for loss of amenities (3) shortened expectation ..... personal injury cases, the compensation awarded by the court should be substantial, it should not be merely token damages.head note-b reads thus:motor vehicles act, 1988 (59/88) - section 173 - personal injury causes - deprivation - three consequences are (a) loss of earning and earning capacity (b) expenses to pay others for what ..... normal and full life. appellant has become very much dependent upon others even for maintaining his physical mobility.it is further held in head note-a.section 173-personal injury cases-duty of courts and tribunals while considering deprivation-held-they should have due regard to the gravity and degree of deprivation as .....

Canara Precision Instruments by Prop. Mrs. Lalitha M. Achar, Vs. Union ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2007Kant100; III(2007)BC203; [2007]137CompCas306(Kar); ILR2007KAR410

..... may refer to rule 7 of the debt recovery tribunal (procedure rules, 1993 which reads thus:11. application fee: every application under section 19(1) of section 19(2) or section 19(8) or section 30(1) of the act or interlocutory application or application for review of decision of the tribunal shall be accompanied by a fee provided in the sub-rule (2 ..... hand before the tribunal. according to him, the same cannot be implied and read into in the absence of specific provision as to prescribing fees.16. when section 30 of the act itself makes it specific that such an application/appeal be filed before the tribunal as against the order of the recovery officer is in the form of an appeal ..... by the debt recovery tribunal as such, it did not insist upon payment of court fee.15. the argument of the petitioners' counsel is that, as per section 19 of the act, it is only the recovery process which is to be dealt with by the tribunal and under such circumstance, fees sought to be paid on the said quantum .....

Bpl Limited Rep. by Its General Manager Corporate Taxation and Audit S ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)208CTR(Kar)346; [2007]293ITR321(KAR); [2007]293ITR321(Karn)

..... the predecessor assessing officer and which were not considered by the predecessor assessing officers came up before the assessing officer who initiated action under section 16(1) of the act for the assessment of taxable gift in the form of appraisal reports and seized records. he has also noticed transfer of shares that ..... long years; and, in the light of search proceedings, deputy commissioner of income tax sought permission from the additional commissioner for notice under section 16(1) of the act approval was granted by the additional commissioner on 6.12.1999, and, a notice was thereafter issued by the department assessment order was made ..... the said letter several contentions are raised. the assessing authority negatived the contentions urged by the appellant and an order was passed under section 15(3) read with section 16 of the act assessing authority after considering the material facts ordered payment of gift tax by holding that the shares transferred by the appellant company was .....