Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 11 of about 233 results (0.176 seconds)

Sep 11 2014 (HC)

Narendra Kumar Chouhan Vs. State (Education) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4882/2012. Narendra Kumar Chouhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 11/09/2014 1/14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER :: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4882/2012. Narendra Kumar Chouhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::::11. h September, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Narendra Kumar Chouhan, petitioner present-in-person. Mr. Jassiram Ramsnehi, OIC, Divisional Sanskrit Edu. Officer, Jodhpur. -- BY THE COURT:1. The lawyers are observing strike which is contrary to various Supreme Court decisions. Names of Dr. Nupur Bhati, as counsel for the petitioner and name of Mr. B.L. Bhati, Govt. Counsel and Digvijay Singh, Addl. Govt. Counsel are shown in the cause list.2. The case is listed at Serial No.90 in today's cause list under the category of For Hearing..3. Heard the petitioner and the Officer-in-Charge, who are present in person and perused the record.4. The petitioner was sele...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2014 (HC)

Laxman Singh Rathore Vs. Raj. Agriculture University, Bkn. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.954/2011 Laxman Singh Rathore Vs. Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner & Anr. Order dated 21/08/2014 1/16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: ORDER :: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.954/2011 Laxman Singh Rathore Vs. Raj. Agri. University, Bikaner & Anr. .. Date of Order :::21. t August, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Laxman Singh Rathore, petitioner present-in-person. Mr. R.K. Bairwa, Assistant Accounts Officer (Officer-in-Charge), Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner, present-in-person. -- BY THE COURT:1. The lawyers are observing strike which is contrary to various Supreme Court decisions.2. Heard the petitioner, Mr. Laxman Singh Rathore, who is present-in-person and on behalf of the respondents, Mr. R.K. Bairwa, Assistant Accounts Officer (Officer-in-Charge), who is also present- in-person.3. The petitioner present-in-person submits that the controversy in hand is covered by the decision of t...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2014 (HC)

Secretary (Admn.) Jvvnl Jodhpur and ors Vs. Ashok Kumar and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.640/2014 In S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7562/2012 The Secretary (Admn.).JVVNL, Jodhpur & ORS.versus Ashok Kumar & Anr. Date of Judgment :: 20th August, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr.Laxmi Narayan, Personnel Officer (DC).JVVNL, Jodhpur. Shri Paras Ram Choudhary, father of Shri Ashok Kumar, present in person....BY THE COURT : By judgment dated 21.2.2014, learned Single Bench directed appellant respondent Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'JVVNL') to comply with the order passed by the Commissioner (Disability).Rajasthan, Jaipur and to provide appointment to the respondent petitioner as an employee in Class-IV cadre. The facts necessary to be noticed for adjudication of this appeal are that the respondent petitioner came to be employed as a casual labourer with JVVNL through a contractor M/s Raj BuildeRs.2 H...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2014 (HC)

Smt. Nisha Mathur and ors Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2329/2014. Smt. Nisha Mathur & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Alongwith 58 other connected matter as mentioned in Schedule) Date of Judgment :28. 07.2014 1/33 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. .. :: JUDGMENT :: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2329/2014. Smt. Nisha Mathur & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Alongwith 58 other connected matters as mentioned in the attached Schedule) .. Date of Judgment ::28. h July, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. G.R. Punia, Sr. Advocate with ]. Mr. Y.P. Khileree ]. Mr. Narpat Singh ]. Mr. Suniel Purohit ].- for the petitioner(s). Mr. T.S. Rathore ]. Mr. N.R. Choudhary ]. Mr. R.S. Choudhary ]. Mr. S.S. Gour ]. Mr. S.P. Singh ]. Mr. Hanuman Singh Choudhary ]. Mr. Narpat Singh Rajpurohit ]. Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi ]. Dr. P.S. Bhati, AAG for the State. Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore, Assistant to the AAG. -- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This lot of writ petitions is being disposed...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2014 (HC)

Guru Vikas Vs. Shweta (Priya)

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

-1- DB Civil Misc. Appeal No.359/2013 Guru Vikas Sharma v. Shweta (Priya) Date of Judgment :: 25th July, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr.Guru Vikas Sharma, appellant, present in person. None present, for the respondent...This miscellaneous appeal as per Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is preferred to question correctness of the order dated 14.3.2013 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Family Court, Bikaner. The facts necessary for adjudication of this appeal are that appellant Guru Vikas Sharma entered into a wedlock with Ms.Shweta (Priya) on 9.7.2011. Having certain differences, the couple decided to get their marriage annulled, thus, an application in accordance with Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was presented before the Family Court, Bikaner on 24.1.2012. On 15.1.2013 statements of Ms.Shweta (Priya) (AW-1) and Guru Vikas Sharma (AW-2) were recorded by the Family Court. The statements given by the couple units read a...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2014 (HC)

Kashi Ram and Ors Vs. Lr's of Lekh Ram

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.219/2013 Kashi Ram & ORS.versus Lekh Ram & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 24th July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.S.Choudhary, for the appellants. Mr.Suresh Shrimali, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 19.11.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Nohar, District Hanumangarh, whereby, the appeal preferred by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 09.05.2006 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division).Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh was upheld. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellants- plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 10.08.1990 on 14.08.2003 with the averments that defendant Lekh Ram for fulfilling family requirements required money and, therefore, after receiving a sum of Rs.25,000/- in cash from the plaintiffs' father/hu...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2014 (HC)

Smt. Radha Devi Vs. Lr's of Lekh Ram

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.218/2013 Smt. Radha Devi versus Lekh Ram & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 24th July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.S.Choudhary, for the appellant. Mr.Suresh Shrimali, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 19.11.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Nohar, District Hanumangarh, whereby, the appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 09.05.2006 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division).Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh was upheld. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellant- plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 10.08.1990 on 14.08.2003 with the averments that defendant Lekh Ram for fulfilling family requirements required money and, therefore, after receiving a sum of Rs.25,000/- in cash from the plaintiff executed agreem...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2014 (HC)

M.M.Sebastiyan Vs. U.i.T.Udaipur

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.111/2012 M.M.Sebastiyan versus Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur Date of Judgment :: 21.07.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, for the appellant. Mr.Deelip Kawadia, for the respondent. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 29.03.2012 passed by Additional District Judge No.1, Udaipur, whereby, the judgment and decree dated 28.02.1998 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.2, Udaipur has been set aside and the suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff has been dismissed. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellant- plaintiff filed a suit for injunction on 01.12.1990, inter alia, with the averments that plot No.96, Moti Magri, Udaipur was allotted by defendant-Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur (UIT) to Mr.John Mathew on 31.12.1971; Mr.John Mathew executed an agreement to sale...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2014 (HC)

Mewar Railway Stall and Trolly Con.San Vs. Union of India and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Mewar Railway Staff & Trolley Contractor Sangh versus Union of India & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.697/2011 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Date of Order: 16th July, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA, J. Mr.J.P.Joshi, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Siddharth Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr.Kamal Dave, for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT: The matter comes up for final disposal at admission stage as per orders passed by this Court on 26th of May 2014. Heard learned counsel for the parties. On 26th of May 2014, learned counsel for the petitioner made a request seeking permission of the Court [2].to withdraw the writ petition. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner was opposed by learned counsel for the respondents and thereupon following order was passed: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition but learned coun...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2014 (HC)

Mangat Ram Taneja Vs. Raj. Housingh Board Jaipur and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ***** :: ORDER:: (1) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11366/2011 Mangat Ram Taneja versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(2) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11311/2011 Rajendra Kumar versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(3) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11312/2011 Indraj Godara versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(4) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11313/2011 Ratan Lal versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(5) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11314/2011 Brij Mohan Batra versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(6) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11315/2011 Narendra Kumar Agarwal versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(7) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11316/2011 Indraj Pal Kukia versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(8) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11317/2011 Banwari Lal Godara versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(9) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11318/2011 Dev Kumar versus Rajasthan Housing Board & ORS.(10) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11319/2011 Ashok Kumar Jagga versus ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //