Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.6176/2014 (Mahaveer Bishnoi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 1st July, 2015 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr.Deepak Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Ladrecha, Additional Advocate General, for respondent State. Mr.G.R.Punia, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr.N.R.Choudhary, for the applicants...BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR,J.) The President, Legal Cell of Vishnoi Mahasabha Van Evam Vanya Jeev Raksha Samiti. has preferred this petition for writ with a prayer to restrain the respondents from organising 'Tonga Race' from village Mundiad to Kharnal and from Kharnal to Nagaur on the occasion of 'Ganeshji Ka Mela' and 'Veer Tejaji Ka Mela'. As per the petitioner in light of the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1960') the race so organised is a cr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) D.B. Criminal Murder Reference No.3/2013 The State of Raj. vs. Manoj Pratap Singh (2) D.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No.854/2013 Manoj Pratap Singh vs. The State of Raj. Against the order dated 28.9.2013 passed by the Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.12/2013. Date of Judgment :29. 5.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. J.P. Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati, Counsel for the accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh. BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Miss Jaishree Thakur,J.) 1. The learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand vide order dated 28.9.2013 has convicted accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f) and Section 302, Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) D.B. Criminal Murder Reference No.3/2013 The State of Raj. vs. Manoj Pratap Singh (2) D.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No.854/2013 Manoj Pratap Singh vs. The State of Raj. Against the order dated 28.9.2013 passed by the Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.12/2013. Date of Judgment :29. 5.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. J.P. Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati, Counsel for the accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh. BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Miss Jaishree Thakur,J.) 1. The learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand vide order dated 28.9.2013 has convicted accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f) and Section 302, Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1. The instant writ application witnesses a challenge to the award dated 6th September, 1996, passed by the Labour Court, Ajmer. The President, Ajmer Adhyogik Karmachari Sangh, Ajmer, (hereinafter referred to as 'petitioner-Sangh', for short), in the writ application, has prayed for the following relief(s):- "(A) Call for the relevant file LCR No.4/96(35/84- Ajmer Udyog Karmachari Sangh V/s M/s Toshniwal Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ajmer) from the Respondent No.1. (B) To issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction and thereby quash and set aside the Award Ex.3 and consequently declar "lay off" of workman of Servashri Dhan Singhi, Shanker Singh and Ratan Singh (vide Ex.1/Ex. M-3 and Ex.2/ Ex.-M-5) as illegal, unlawful and invalid. (C) Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction and thereby direct the manangement to pay to the aforesaid workmen the arrears of wages with all consequential benefits, deducting the amount already paid to them. (D) Costs of this writ petition be also allowed to t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Ajay Rastogi, J. 1. Instant appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant (wife) aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 29.05.2013 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Kota whereby the suit for divorce filed at the instance of the plaintiff-appellant on the ground of cruelty by the defendant-respondent (husband) came to be dismissed. 2. The appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant (wife) and the respondent herein is husband. The petition, filed by the wife claiming divorce u/Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, came to be dismissed by the Family Court vide judgment and decree dated 29.05.2013 despite two salient facts came on record that (1) in the FIR No.219 dated 12.09.2007 registered against the defendant-respondent (husband) at Police Station Mahila Thana, Kota for offence u/Sec.498-A, 406 and 120-B IPC after regular trial, the defendant-respondent (husband) was convicted u/Sec.498-A IPC and sentenced to undergo two years imprisonment vide judgment dated 12.10.2012, howev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR1 D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1572/2015 Rajmal Jain V/s Union of India & ors.2. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1366/2015 Bhanwar Lal V/s Union of India & ors.3. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1562/2015 Vijay Singh Sisodiya V/s Union of India & ors.4. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1564/2015 Shankerlal V/s Union of India & ors.5. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1575/2015 Shankerlal V/s Union of India & ors.6. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1576/2015 Fatah Lal Labana V/s Union of India & ors.7. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1579/2015 M/s Baldev Raj V/s Union of India & ors.8. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1580/2015 M/s Mehta Diesel House V/s Union of India & ors.9. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1631/2015 Gunwanti Nandan Srimali V/s State & ors.10. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1633/2015 Kamlesh V/s State & ors.11. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1634/2015 Mohan Singh V/s State & ors.12. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1761/2015 Suresh Kumar V/s Union of India & ors.13. D.B....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, C.J. 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioners having valid licenses for `barrel point' sale of diesel in the respective districts of the State of Rajasthan, for the period upto 2016 and 2017 (for two years from the date of issue or renewal), have challenged the order passed by the Additional Food Commissioner, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Rajasthan dated 19.12.2014, as well as the Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) Order, 2005 (for short, "the Central Order of 2005") issued by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas on 19th December, 2005 under section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the consequential actions, by which their licenses have been cancelled during the period of their validity. The petitioners have also prayed for declaration of clauses 2(d) and 3(4) of the Central Order of 2005, as unconstitution...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
This appeal has been filed by the claimant appellant against the judgment passed by the Tribunal. 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 13-1-2008 Alsatian Dog G.S.D., brown coloured, aged about 3 years, when going with his master, near Government school at about 7.00 a.m. for opening the Milk Dairy, no sooner did they reach on the road in Jalam Singh Ka Bas, suddenly a pick up Jeep No. R. J. 14 GA 9766, being driven by its driver rashly and negligently, hit the dog at a fast motion, as a result of which the dog sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to injuries. The s claimant filed a claim petition under Section s 166/140 of MV Act before the Tribunal. Thereafter notices were issued; reply was filed certain issues were framed and after hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the judgment dated 21-11-2008 dismissing the claim petition filed by the claimant. 3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, this appeal has been filed by the claimant. 4. Learned counsel for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
By this criminal misc petition, a challenge is made to the order dated 14.10.2014, passed on the application under section 391 CrPC. The application aforesaid was dismissed as not found maintainable to produce documentary evidence at the appellate stage. Learned counsel for petitioners has referred certain judgments, wherein, it is held that documentary as well as oral evidence can be allowed under section 391 CrPC. In view of above, prayer is made to set aside the impugned order and allow the application. Learned counsel for non-petitioner submits that section 391 CrPC applies only for oral evidence and not for documentary. He has referred judgment of this court in the case of Jugal Kishore versus Roshan Lal , [1999 CrLR(Raj)203]. The prayer is made to dismiss the petition as application under section 391 CrPC is not maintainable to lead documentary evidence. Various paras of the judgment in the case of Jugal Kishore (supra) were referred to show as to why section 391 CrPC is not appl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1604/1996 Chatra & ORS.versus Mahadevji Neel Kanth, Godunda & ORS.Date of Order :: 17th April, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Deelip Kawadia, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Sajjan Singh, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition is directed against judgment dated 25.08.1995 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer ('Board').whereby, the appeal filed by the petitioners against judgment dated 10.07.1990 passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur ('RAA') and judgment dated 27.12.1988 passed by the Assistant Collector, Head QuarteRs.Udaipur ('the Collector') has been rejected. The respondent filed a suit for declaration of Khudkasht under Section 90 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 ('the Act').eviction of the defendants under Section 183 of the Act from land admeasuring 22 Bighas 14 Biswas situated at Dadiya, Tehsil Gogunda, for injunction under Section 92 and for...
Tag this Judgment!