Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 1 of about 233 results (0.090 seconds)

Oct 16 2014 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra Lohiya Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7103/2014 Ramesh Chandra Lohiya V/s. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 30th September, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.10/2007 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that two cases under Sections 5/9B(1)(B) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, 2 Act of 1884) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code are pending against the petitioner. From the recitals of the order, it is borne out that th...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2014 (HC)

Tahir Ali Ansari Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7112/2014 Tahir Ali Ansari V/s. State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 14th August, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.02/2005 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884) and Sections 286, 336 of the Indian Penal Code is pending 2 against the petitioner. The suspension of licence was assailed by the petitioner before the app...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2014 (HC)

Satyanarayan Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7098/2014 Satyanarayan V/s. State of Rajasthan & anr. Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 30th September, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.38/1993 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Sections 5, 9B(i) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code is pending against 2 the petitioner. From the recitals of the order, it is borne out that the Commissioner,...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Mohd. Umar and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them as null and void ab initio so as the order dated 28.6.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.13, Jaipur Metropolitan on criminal revision petition against the order dated 29.5.2014. A further prayer is to declare remand of accused petitioners as null and void so as the custody and they may be discharged and set at liberty. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 21.6.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3420/2014), order dated 18.8.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3798/2014). The challenge to the aforesaid orders have been made on the same grounds as have been urged in the main Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014 and separa...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2014 (HC)

Derawar Singh Vs. State (Home Affairs) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2011 Deravar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Order dt:2. 7/2014 1/28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2011 Deravar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Date of Order :::2. d July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Shreyansh Mardia for Mr. Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Ms.Shweta Bora, for the respondents. --- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. The present petitioner Derawar Singh S/O Bhakar Singh working as Sub-Inspector of Police has preferred this writ petition claiming an out of turn promotion. against the 10% reserved vacancies for the year 2006-2007 under Rule 28 of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 which is enacted to reward the police personnel who perform the outstanding and extraordinary acts of courage in discharge of their duties and with their outstanding caliber in the fields like anti-dacoity or anti-smuggling or any special field of poli...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2014 (HC)

Abdul Hamid and ors Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Abdul Hamid & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan D.B. Criminal Appeal No.929/2013 against the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.36/2010. Date of Judgment ::31. t October, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr. Dhirendra Singh, for the appellants. Mr. J.P.Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor, for the State. .... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE Being questioned correctness of the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.36/2010, this appeal is before us. By the judgment impugned learned trial Judge convicted the accused appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 121, 121-A, 122, 123 Ranbir Penal Code read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and Section 25 read with ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2013 (HC)

A.C.T.O.,cir-a,w-iv,bikaner Vs. M/S Gayatri Udhyog

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER 1 S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.21/2005 Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Somani Mills, Bikaner 2.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.531/2005 Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Bikaner Woolen Mills Limited. 3.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.153/2005 ACTO, Circle-A, Ward 4, Bikaner Vs. M/s. Gayatri Udhyog DATE OF ORDER:29. hAugust, 2013 ::P R E S E N T:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Dinesh Kumar Godara for Mr. V.K. Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the petitioners. Mr. Varun Singhvi for Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the respondent-assessee. *** BY THE COURT: Since common issues and questions of law are involved in all these three revision petitions under Section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act 1994 (for short, the Act of 1994), therefore, all of them are heard together and being disposed of by this common order. [2] At the threshold, while admitting all these...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2013 (HC)

Saddiqui Mohammad and ors Vs. State (Mines and Geology) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 DBCWP (PIL) No.4829/2012 Saddique Mohammad & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::::: :: ORDER :: D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.4829/2012. Saddique Mohammad & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF ORDER :: 18th October 2013. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.S.P.Sharma, for the petitioneRs.Mr.G.R. Punia Sr.Advocate & AAG with Mr.Jamwant Gurjar, for the respondents Nos.1 to 5 & 7. Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Akhilesh Rajpurohit & Mr.Rajesh Joshi, for the respondent No.9 BY THE COURT : The instant writ petition has been filed by 13 petitioners as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) stating grievance against the mining operations being carried out by the respondent Hindustan Zinc Limited near village Agucha, Tehsil Hurda, District Bhilwara. The petitioners have stated the summary of the cause to maintain this writ petition as PIL in the following:- Thus, this writ petition in the n...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2015 (HC)

Jodhpur National University Jodhpur Vs. State and Anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

JODHPUR NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7628/15) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER JODHPUR NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7628/15) Dated: - 8th September, 2015. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr.Sanajeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ankur Mathur, Mr.Ankit Sethi and Mr.Rajesh Kala, for the petitioner. Dr.P.S.Bhati,Additional Advocate General with Mr.S.S.Rathore, for the respondents.1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 3.7.15 issued by the Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Rajasthan, banning the admission of the students in Jodhpur National University (for short 'the University') during the academic session 2015-16.2. The petitioner-University, a body corporate, has been constituted and established under the provisions of Jodhpur National University, Jodhpur Act, 2009 ( for short the Act. her...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2014 (HC)

Guru Bux Singh Vs. Khem Singh

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.226/1999 LRs of Late Shri Guru Bux Singh versus Khem Singh Date of Judgment :: 28th February,2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.K.Thanvi Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Narendra Thanvi, for the appellants. Mr.M.C.Bhoot Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Arpit Bhoot, for the respondent. ---- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against appellate judgment and decree dated 24.02.1999 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Jodhpur, whereby, the judgment and decree dated 13.12.1996 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.1, Jodhpur has been modified. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : a suit for eviction on the ground of default in payment of rent was filed on 03.02.1981 by Maji Leel Kanwar Deodi through her power of attorney holder Hanuman Singh against Guru Bux Singh for eviction from shop No.10 and a room adjacent to i...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //