Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them as null and void ab initio so as the order dated 28.6.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.13, Jaipur Metropolitan on criminal revision petition against the order dated 29.5.2014. A further prayer is to declare remand of accused petitioners as null and void so as the custody and they may be discharged and set at liberty. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 21.6.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3420/2014), order dated 18.8.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3798/2014). The challenge to the aforesaid orders have been made on the same grounds as have been urged in the main Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014 and separa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Abdul Hamid & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan D.B. Criminal Appeal No.929/2013 against the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.36/2010. Date of Judgment ::31. t October, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr. Dhirendra Singh, for the appellants. Mr. J.P.Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor, for the State. .... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE Being questioned correctness of the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.36/2010, this appeal is before us. By the judgment impugned learned trial Judge convicted the accused appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 121, 121-A, 122, 123 Ranbir Penal Code read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and Section 25 read with ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7103/2014 Ramesh Chandra Lohiya V/s. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 30th September, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.10/2007 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that two cases under Sections 5/9B(1)(B) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, 2 Act of 1884) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code are pending against the petitioner. From the recitals of the order, it is borne out that th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7112/2014 Tahir Ali Ansari V/s. State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 14th August, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.02/2005 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884) and Sections 286, 336 of the Indian Penal Code is pending 2 against the petitioner. The suspension of licence was assailed by the petitioner before the app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7098/2014 Satyanarayan V/s. State of Rajasthan & anr. Date of Order ::: 16.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue involved in this matter is very short, and therefore, with the consent of the rival parties matter is heard finally at this stage. By the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 30th September, 2014 (Annex.3) passed by the Police Commissioner, Jodhpur, whereby his licence for sale of explosives bearing No.38/1993 is suspended. The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Sections 5, 9B(i) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code is pending against 2 the petitioner. From the recitals of the order, it is borne out that the Commissioner,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2011 Deravar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Order dt:2. 7/2014 1/28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10186/2011 Deravar Singh V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. Date of Order :::2. d July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Shreyansh Mardia for Mr. Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Ms.Shweta Bora, for the respondents. --- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. The present petitioner Derawar Singh S/O Bhakar Singh working as Sub-Inspector of Police has preferred this writ petition claiming an out of turn promotion. against the 10% reserved vacancies for the year 2006-2007 under Rule 28 of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 which is enacted to reward the police personnel who perform the outstanding and extraordinary acts of courage in discharge of their duties and with their outstanding caliber in the fields like anti-dacoity or anti-smuggling or any special field of poli...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. PETITION NO.2865/2015 Sharad Chandra @ Sarat Chandra. versus State of Rajasthan. Date of order : 18.12.2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA. Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.a/w Mr.Ashwin Nayak & Mr.Bhavit Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Vyas, G.A., for the State. Mr.P.C.Solanki, for the complainant. Mr.Samir Singh, DCP (West) and Ms.Seema Hingoniya, ACP West, present in person. Reportable Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. By way of the instant misc. petition, the accused petitioner Sharad Chandra @ Sarat Chandra has approached this Court being aggrieved of the order dated 9.9.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur District, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.152/2013 whereby, the application preferred on his behalf in the trial Court under Section 91 2 Cr.P.C.for summoning certain documents, was rejected. The petitioner is facing trial in the Court of learn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. By way of the instant misc. petition, the accused petitioner Sharad Chandra @ Sarat Chandra has approached this Court being aggrieved of the order dated 9.9.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur District, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.152/2013 whereby, the application preferred on his behalf in the trial Court under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for summoning certain documents, was rejected. The petitioner is facing trial in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur District, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 342, 376(2)(f), 376D, 354A, 370(4), 506, 509/34, 109 and 120-B I.P.C., Sections 23 and 26 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 5(f)(g)/6 and 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The trial is presently proceeding at the stage of cross examination of the last prosecution witness namely, the Investigating Officer PW 43 Smt.Chanchal Mishra. There is a serious contest between the accused and the prosecuti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14091/2013 Sarwajeet Singh versus Union of India & ORS.Date of Order :: 17.12.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.J.K.Kaushik, for the petitioner. Mr.D.P.Dhaka for Mr.A.K.Rajvanshy, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the orders dated 18.08.2010 (Annex.-4).whereby penalty of removal from service has been imposed on the petitioner and appellate order dated 18.05.2011 (Annex.-6).whereby appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 18.08.2010 has been rejected. Notices of the writ petition were ordered to be issued on 06.12.2013 by a coordinate Bench of this Court. The respondents have filed their reply to the writ petition. A preliminary objection has been raised that as no part cause of action has arisen in favour of the petitioner within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, the writ petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER (1) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5373/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (2) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5375/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (3) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5377/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (4) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8647/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (5) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8648/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (6) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8851/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (7) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8852/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors Date of Order :15. 12.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the petitioner. Dr. P.S. Bhati, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sajjan Singh and Mr. Sanjay Raj Paliwal . REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Ms. Jaishree Thakur, J.) 1. The above me...
Tag this Judgment!