1
Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jul-15-2015
By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them as null and void ab initio so as the order dated 28.6.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.13, Jaipur Metropolitan on criminal revision petition against the order dated 29.5.2014. A further prayer is to declare remand of accused petitioners as null and void so as the custody and they may be discharged and set at liberty. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 21.6.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3420/2014), order dated 18.8.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3798/2014). The challenge to the aforesaid orders have been made on the same grounds as have been urged in the main Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014 and separa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-18-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. PETITION NO.2865/2015 Sharad Chandra @ Sarat Chandra. versus State of Rajasthan. Date of order : 18.12.2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA. Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.a/w Mr.Ashwin Nayak & Mr.Bhavit Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Vyas, G.A., for the State. Mr.P.C.Solanki, for the complainant. Mr.Samir Singh, DCP (West) and Ms.Seema Hingoniya, ACP West, present in person. Reportable Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. By way of the instant misc. petition, the accused petitioner Sharad Chandra @ Sarat Chandra has approached this Court being aggrieved of the order dated 9.9.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur District, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.152/2013 whereby, the application preferred on his behalf in the trial Court under Section 91 2 Cr.P.C.for summoning certain documents, was rejected. The petitioner is facing trial in the Court of learn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-18-2015
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. By way of the instant misc. petition, the accused petitioner Sharad Chandra @ Sarat Chandra has approached this Court being aggrieved of the order dated 9.9.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur District, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.152/2013 whereby, the application preferred on his behalf in the trial Court under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for summoning certain documents, was rejected. The petitioner is facing trial in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur District, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 342, 376(2)(f), 376D, 354A, 370(4), 506, 509/34, 109 and 120-B I.P.C., Sections 23 and 26 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 5(f)(g)/6 and 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The trial is presently proceeding at the stage of cross examination of the last prosecution witness namely, the Investigating Officer PW 43 Smt.Chanchal Mishra. There is a serious contest between the accused and the prosecuti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-17-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14091/2013 Sarwajeet Singh versus Union of India & ORS.Date of Order :: 17.12.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.J.K.Kaushik, for the petitioner. Mr.D.P.Dhaka for Mr.A.K.Rajvanshy, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the orders dated 18.08.2010 (Annex.-4).whereby penalty of removal from service has been imposed on the petitioner and appellate order dated 18.05.2011 (Annex.-6).whereby appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 18.08.2010 has been rejected. Notices of the writ petition were ordered to be issued on 06.12.2013 by a coordinate Bench of this Court. The respondents have filed their reply to the writ petition. A preliminary objection has been raised that as no part cause of action has arisen in favour of the petitioner within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, the writ petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-15-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER (1) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5373/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (2) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5375/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (3) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5377/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (4) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8647/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (5) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8648/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (6) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8851/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (7) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8852/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors Date of Order :15. 12.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the petitioner. Dr. P.S. Bhati, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sajjan Singh and Mr. Sanjay Raj Paliwal . REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Ms. Jaishree Thakur, J.) 1. The above me...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-15-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.13750/2015 Mishrilal Vs State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 15.12.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.T.R.S.Sodha for the petitioner Mr.R.S.Choudhary for the respondent No.4 (caveator) Reportable BY THE COURT: Petitioner, an elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Dhanop Panchayat Samiti, Shahpura District Bhilwara has laid this writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the impugned judgment dated 17.11.2015 (Annex.6) rendered by the Additional District Judge, Shahpura District Bhilwara (for short the learned Election Tribunal).By the impugned judgment, the learned Election Tribunal has allowed the election petition of the forth respondent election petitioner under Section 43 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (for short the Act) read with Rule 80 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) rules, 1994 (for short the Rules of 1994) and o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-07-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : JUDGMENT : (1)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2002/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. (2)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2003/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. (3)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2004/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. (4)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2009/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. (5)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2010/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. (6)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2011/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur vs. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum & Ors. (7)-D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.2015/2011 Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-26-2015
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Parag Kumar & ORS.versus State & ORS.S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11190 of 2015 Date of Order ::: November 26, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Anand Purohit, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr.C.D.Upadhyay, for petitioneRs.Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, Dy. Govt. Counsel, for respondent No.1 to 3. Mr.Tribhuvan Gupta and Mr.Usman Ghani, for respondent No.4. ***** BY THE COURT: PetitioneRs.the alleged trustees of respondent No.4 Public Trust, registered under the Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, 1959 (for short, Act of 1959).have laid this writ petition craving therein undermentioned reliefs: a. To direct the respondent No.3 herein to decide the application preferred by the petitioners under the provisions of section 38 as expeditiously as possible more particularly within a period of four weeks from the date of direction issued by this Honble Court; b. To declare that in the light of the consent decree dated 3-8-2014 Annex.No....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-26-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1195/2015 Smt.Mukut Raj Laxmi & Anr. Vs Dr.Jitendra Singh & ORS.Date of Order :: 26th November 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.S.C.Maloo for the petitioners Mr.O.P.Mehta for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr.G.R.Singhvi for the respondent No.3 BY THE COURT: Imploring annulment of impugned order dated 15.01.2015 (Annex.5) passed by learned District Judge, Jaisalmer (for short the learned court below).the petitioners-defendants have laid this writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of Constitution of India. By the order impugned, the learned court below has accepted the application of the respondents-plaintiffs under Order VIII Rule 9 read with Section 151 CPC in a suit for possession, mesne profits and perpetual injunction. Succinctly stated facts of the case are that fiRs.and second respondents-plaintiffs jointly filed a suit for possession, mesne profits and perpetual injunction against ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-18-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT [1].- D.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.760/2009 Dala Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan [2].- D.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.20/2010 Sanwta Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan against the judgment dated 15.10.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track), Nagaur in Sessions Case No.260/2001 (34/2000). Date of Judgment ::18. 11.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. D.K. Godara, for the appellants Mr. Vishnu Kachhwaha, Public Prosecutor Mr. J.R. Choudhary, for the complainant ... BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE MATHUR, J.) Arising out of judgment dated 19.10.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Nagaur in Sessions Case No.260/2001 (34/2000) these two appeals are before us. The learned trial court by the judgment impugned recorded conviction of accused-appellants Dala Ram and Sanwta Ram and also awarded sentence to them as under :- ACCUSED-DALA RAM :- 302 I.P.C. Life im...
Tag this Judgment!